Heart: Year in Review OSOTC 2018 Transplant Symposium September 7, 2018 Brent C. Lampert, DO, FACC Medical Director, Heart Transplantation and Mechanical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CURRENT STATE OF LIVER ALLOCATION AND DISTRIBUTION John R. Lake, MD University of Minnesota Medical School.
Advertisements

SRTR Transplant Benefit-Based Liver Allocation Robert M. Merion, MD, FACS OPTN/UNOS Liver Forum Atlanta, GA April 12, 2010.
Concentric Circle Liver Distribution Models
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee Spring 2014 Update.
November 12, 2014 St. Louis, Missouri OPTN Strategic Planning Feedback Board of Directors.
Josef Stehlik, MD, MPH Associate Professor of Medicine Medical Director, Heart Transplant Program University of Utah School of Medicine Director, ISHLT.
MCS in Special Populations: The Use of Mechanical Support in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease 9 th Annual Meeting May 15, 2015 Christina VanderPluym,MD.
The New Kidney Allocation System Gautham Mogilishetty, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Nephrology and Transplantation University of Cincinnati.
The use of high-risk donors decreases one-year survival in high-risk lung recipients Matthew Mulligan, Pablo G Sanchez, Charles F Evans, Sina Rahimpour,
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee Update Report David Mulligan, MD, Chair OPTN/UNOS Board of Directors Meeting November 12-13, 2014.
1 Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee Fall 2015.
OPTN Proposal to Revise the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) System and Salient Activities of the Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee.
HEART TRANSPLANTATION Pediatric Recipients 2014 JHLT Oct; 33(10):
David A. Gerber, MD Professor and Chief Division of Abdominal Transplantation Department of Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
1 Proposal to Modify Pediatric Lung Allocation Policy Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee Fall 2015.
1 National Webinar: Proposed Modification of the Adult Heart Allocation System Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee February 2, 2016 If you are logged.
When Using SRTR Slides. SRTR Slide Use Guidelines.
Cadaveric vs Living Donation; Comparing Options
Proposal to Modify the Adult Heart Allocation System: Round 2
Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation
Enhancing Liver Distribution
Pediatric Transplantation Committee
Pediatric Transplantation Committee
Revisions to Pediatric Emergency Membership Exception
Assist Devices for the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Role of ECMO in Acute Cardiogenic Shock
Intermacs and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)
The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-first Official Adult Heart Transplant Report—2014; Focus Theme: Retransplantation 
Updates on the New Adult Heart Allocation System
Manipulation of the Waitlist Priority of the Organ Allocation System through the Escalation of Medical Therapies Ethics Committee.
Expedited Organ Placement Concept Paper
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
What Patients Should Know About the New Adult Heart Allocation System
Modifications to the Distribution of Deceased Donor Lungs
The Call is Made Rhonda Duggan, BSN, RN, CCTC August 29, 2014
Pediatric Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Proposal to Modify the Adult Heart Allocation System
Analyzing Geographic Disparity in U.S. Heart Allocation System
Pediatric Transplantation Committee
Ad Hoc Geography Committee Update
Changes to HCC Criteria for Auto Approval
OPTN/UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
What Patients Should Know About the New Adult Heart Allocation System
Membership & Professional Standards Committee
Pancreas Program Functional Inactivity
Liver & Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee Spring 2019
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Ethical Implications of Multi-Organ Transplants (MOT)
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Pediatric Transplantation Committee
Patient Affairs Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Enhancing Liver Distribution
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Proposal to Delay the HCC Exception Score Assignment
Pediatric Transplantation Committee Regional Meeting Update Fall 2012
Liver & Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Pediatric Transplantation Committee Fall 2014
Histocompatibility Committee
Donor Allocation Policy in the US
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee
Liver Transplantation and Organ Allocation in 2019
Transplant Staffing Model at a Large Volume Lung Transplant Center
Organ Allocation Update: Lung and Heart Region 5 Collaborative Las Vegas, Nevada August 21, 2019 Maryl Johnson, MD President, UNOS/OPTN Board of Directors.
Presentation transcript:

Heart: Year in Review OSOTC 2018 Transplant Symposium September 7, 2018 Brent C. Lampert, DO, FACC Medical Director, Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine

Objectives Review the most recent heart transplant volume and survival statistics Understand current allocation system and its limitations Discuss upcoming changes to the heart allocation system

50 Years of Heart Transplantation December 3, 1967

Number of heart transplants by year All time high 2015 was an Lund et al, JHLT 2017

Adult heart transplants: survival by era Lund et al, JHLT 2017

Current Allocation Policy Adult Candidate Prioritization: Status 1A MCS 30 days elective VAD time TAH IABP ECMO VAD with complication Mechanical ventilation PAC + 1 high-dose or multiple inotropes Exception Status 1B LVAD/RVAD Continuous inotropes Status 2 Those who do not meet 1A or 1BB Geographic Allocation Local: Status 1A, Status 1B Zone A: Status 1A, Status 1B Local: Status 2 Zone B: Status 1A, Status 1B Zone A: Status 2 Zone B: Status 2 Etc…

Problems with the Current System Status 1A candidates are 3x more likely to die on the waiting list than candidates in any other status High # of exception requests indicates certain candidates not served well by current system Policy out of date re: increased use of MCSDs and associated complications Current geographic sharing scheme is inequitable

Categories for Adult 1A Exceptions Am J Transplantation 2015;15:44-54

Where Would You Want to Be Waiting as Status I?

New Statuses: High Level Current Status New Status 1A 1 2 3 1B 4 5 6 Statuses 1-3 generally defined by current status 1A criteria Status 4 generally defined by current status 1B criteria Statuses 5-6 generally defined by current status 2 criteria

Status Overview: Status 1

Status Overview: Status 2

Status Overview: Status 3 Status 1 & 2 Time Limited: VA ECMO: 7 Days Perc endovascular circulatory support or IABP: 14 days

Device Complications Specified

Status Overview: Status 4

Status Overview: Status 5

Status Overview: Status 6

Heart Distribution Changes Current Distribution 1A & 1B get local preference If no local match, next level is within 500 nautical miles Then expand to 1000 miles

Heart Distribution Changes – Broader Sharing Status 1 and 2 will be considered first up to 500 miles from donor location before candidates with status 3-6

2 Yr Post Transplant Mortality Simulation Data 2 Yr Post Transplant Mortality Waitlist Mortality SRTR Data 2/2014

Two Phase Implementation

Limitations / Controversies Redesign does not account for all groups Sensitized patients Refractory angina Should 30 day elective VAD time be extended or eliminated? Will the community agree upon the selected physiological principles that qualify a patient for inotrope or temporary support use?

Summary Current candidate prioritization and donor allocation is not contemporary resulting in inequities Reduce waitlist mortality – allocate organs to most critically ill Addresses issues with specific patient groups that may be marginalized with current system Incorporates broader geographic sharing to optimize access and limit regional disparities Post transplant survival within each status projected to remain comparable to current system

Thank you