Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Sustained Interactions between T Cell Receptors and Antigens Promote the Differentiation of CD4+ Memory T Cells  Chulwoo Kim, Theodore Wilson, Kael F.
Th9 Cells Drive Host Immunity against Gastrointestinal Worm Infection
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Lung Natural Helper Cells Are a Critical Source of Th2 Cell-Type Cytokines in Protease Allergen-Induced Airway Inflammation  Timotheus Y.F. Halim, Ramona H.
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
T Cell-Produced Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Controls T Cell Tolerance and Regulates Th1- and Th17-Cell Differentiation  Ming O. Li, Yisong Y. Wan, Richard.
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
CD301b+ Dermal Dendritic Cells Drive T Helper 2 Cell-Mediated Immunity
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
T Cells with Low Avidity for a Tissue-Restricted Antigen Routinely Evade Central and Peripheral Tolerance and Cause Autoimmunity  Dietmar Zehn, Michael.
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Cell-Intrinsic IL-27 and gp130 Cytokine Receptor Signaling Regulates Virus-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses and Viral Control during Chronic Infection 
In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T cells With IL-2/IL-2 mAb Complexes Prevents Anti- factor VIII Immune Responses in Hemophilia A Mice Treated With Factor.
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Matthew A. Williams, Eugene V. Ravkov, Michael J. Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Yunqi Wang, Maureen A. Su, Yisong Y. Wan  Immunity 
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 896-908 (November 2015) CD4+ T Cell Tolerance to Tissue-Restricted Self Antigens Is Mediated by Antigen- Specific Regulatory T Cells Rather Than Deletion  Francois P. Legoux, Jong-Baeck Lim, Andrew W. Cauley, Stanislav Dikiy, James Ertelt, Thomas J. Mariani, Tim Sparwasser, Sing Sing Way, James J. Moon  Immunity  Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 896-908 (November 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Tissue-Restricted Self Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Are Not Deleted (A) Quantitative RT-PCR data depicting Cre mRNA expression levels normalized to Gapdh in indicated tissues of indicated mice. Mean values ± SEM of samples taken from at least two independent experiments are shown. (B) Representative flow cytometry of CD4+ single positive thymocytes following Cre:I-Ab tetramer-based cell enrichment of thymi. (C) Representative flow cytometry of peripheral CD4+ T cells following Cre:I-Ab tetramer-based cell enrichment of pooled spleen and lymph nodes. Plots represent Dump(B220, CD11b, CD11c, F4/80)−CD3+CD4+ events as described in Figure S1E. Numbers above gates indicate total numbers of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells calculated for the whole mouse. (D and E) Quantitative summaries of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ (D) thymocyte or (E) peripheral T cell numbers per mouse. Each data point represents an individual mouse. Mean values ± SEM are shown. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection as defined by the mean frequency of CD8+tetramer+ events. ns, not significant, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. See also Figure S1. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Lung and Intestinal Self Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Exhibit Impaired Proliferative Responses Mice were immunized with Cre peptide + CFA and analyzed 7 days later. (A) Representative flow cytometry of CD4+ T cells following Cre:I-Ab tetramer-based cell enrichment of pooled spleen and lymph nodes. Plots represent Dump(B220, CD11b, CD11c, F4/80)−CD3+CD4+ events. Numbers inside gates indicate total numbers of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells calculated for the whole mouse. (B) Quantitative summary of total Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers per mouse with fold expansion values indicated. The dotted line represents the limit of detection. (C) Linear regression analysis of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers before and after immunization for each mouse strain. SEM, r2, and p values are indicated. (D) Tetramer mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), expressed in arbitrary units, of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells from individual WT and Cre mice. Lines connect mice analyzed within the same experiment. (E) Quantitative summary of tetramer MFI from individual mice normalized to WT controls analyzed within the same experiment. (F) Linear regression analysis of Cre:I-Ab tetramer staining intensity and Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell expansion for each mouse strain. SEM, r2, and p values are indicated. (B and E) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns not significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. See also Figure S2. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Lung and Intestinal Self Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cells Exhibit Impaired Effector Functions Mice were immunized with Cre peptide + CFA and analyzed 7 days later. (A) Representative intracellular flow cytometry of IL-17 and IFN-γ cytokine expression by Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells from pooled spleen and lymph nodes following in vitro restimulation with PMA + ionomycin. Numbers indicate proportions of cells in each quadrant. (B) Quantitative summary of the proportion of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells expressing IL-17 in each mouse. (C) Representative flow cytometry of IL-17 and CXCR5 expression by Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells from a WT mouse. (D) Representative flow cytometry of PD-1 and CXCR5 expression by Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells. Numbers indicate proportions of cells in each gate. (E and F) Quantitative summaries of proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells exhibiting (E) CXCR5+ or (F) PD-1hiCXCR5hi GC-Tfh cell phenotypes. (B, E, and F) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns, not significant, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. See also Figure S3. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Tolerance to Lung and Intestinal Self Antigen Requires Antigen-Specific Tregs (A) Representative flow cytometry depicting Foxp3EGFP reporter expression in CD4+ T cells following Cre:I-Ab tetramer-based cell enrichment of pooled spleen and lymph nodes from indicated naive mice. Numbers indicate proportions of tetramer+ cells expressing Foxp3. (B) Quantitative summary of the proportion of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells expressing Foxp3 in each indicated mouse strain. (C) Quantitative summary of the total numbers of Foxp3+ and Foxp3− Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells in each indicated mouse strain. (D) Total Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers and (E) proportions of IL-17+ Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells in indicated Foxp3-DEREG mice 7 days following peptide + CFA immunization with (closed symbols) or without (open symbols) concurrent Treg ablation by DT treatment. (F) WT host Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers 7 days after adoptive transfer of ∼4 × 106 CD4+CD25+ Tregs from indicated donor mice followed by immunization with Cre peptide + CFA. (B–F) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns, not significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. See also Figure S4. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Tissue-Restricted Self Antigen-Specific Tregs Are Thymically Derived and Peripherally Expanded (A) Quantitative summary of the proportion of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ SP thymocytes expressing Foxp3 in each indicated mouse strain. (B) Proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific CD4+ T cells expressing Foxp3 in pooled spleen and lymph nodes from lethally irradiated WT or Foxp3ΔCNS1 mice reconstituted with WT or Foxp3ΔCNS1 bone marrow. (C) Proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells expressing Foxp3 in pooled spleen and lymph nodes from Aire−/− mice. (D) Proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells expressing Foxp3 in pooled spleen and lymph nodes from Batf3−/− mice. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Ins2 and Cre mRNA expression relative to B2m in flow sorted thymic epithelial cells (TECs). Mean values ± SEM of samples taken from at least two independent experiments are shown. (F) Proportions of Foxp3- (open symbols) or Foxp3+ (filled symbols) Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells expressing Ki67 in indicated mice. (A–D, F) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns not significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. See also Figure S5. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Treg Mediated Tolerance to Tissue-Restricted Self Antigens Is Lost upon Secondary Immune Challenge (A) Mice were infected with Lm-Cre, and 4 weeks later rechallenged with Cre peptide + CFA. Total Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers in pooled spleen and lymph nodes for each mouse strain are shown at each time point. Mean values ± SEM are indicated. (B) Quantitative summary of total Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers in pooled spleen and lymph nodes before and after secondary challenge with fold expansion values indicated. The dotted line represents the limit of detection. (C) Linear regression analysis of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers before and after secondary immune challenge. SEM, r2, and p values are indicated. (D and E) Proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells (D) expressing IL-17 or IFN-γ cytokines, or (E) exhibiting a GC-Tfh phenotype 7 days after secondary immune challenge. (F) Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers in the pancreas, lungs, and intestines of indicated mice 7–9 days after primary or secondary immunization. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection. (G) Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers in indicated tissues after secondary immunization, expressed as a percentage of total Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells from the whole mouse. (H) Blood glucose levels in naive WT or RIP-Cre mice 7–10 days after primary or secondary immunization. (B, D–H) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns, not significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse or between indicated conditions. See also Figure S6. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The Balance between Treg and Tconv Is Altered after Immune Challenge Mice were infected with Lm-Cre and Cre:I-Ab-specific Tregs from the pooled spleen and lymph nodes were analyzed 4 weeks later. (A) Proportions of Cre:I-Ab-specific T cells expressing Foxp3. (B) Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers in indicated mice. (C) WT host Cre:I-Ab-specific T cell numbers 7 days after adoptive transfer of ∼4 × 106 CD4+CD25+ Tregs from indicated donor mice followed by immunization with Cre peptide + CFA. (A–C) Mean values ± SEM are shown. ns, not significant, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01 for unpaired t tests between WT and each Cre mouse. Immunity 2015 43, 896-908DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2015.10.011) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions