Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structural Basis of Interdomain Communication in the Hsc70 Chaperone
Anatomy of an Amyloidogenic Intermediate
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Ellen Nalivaika, Celia A. Schiffer  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 8, Pages (August 1995)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Symmetry Recognizing Asymmetry
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
De Novo Design of Foldable Proteins with Smooth Folding Funnel
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Mechanisms Contributing to T Cell Receptor Signaling and Assembly Revealed by the Solution Structure of an Ectodomain Fragment of the CD3ϵγ Heterodimer 
Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages 769-780 (March 2002) Structure of the C3b Binding Site of CR1 (CD35), the Immune Adherence Receptor  Brian O. Smith, Rosie L. Mallin, Malgorzata Krych-Goldberg, Xuefeng Wang, Richard E. Hauhart, Krystyna Bromek, Dusan Uhrin, John P. Atkinson, Paul N. Barlow  Cell  Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages 769-780 (March 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4

Figure 1 NMR-Derived Structures of Site 2 from CR1 (A) Location of CCPs 8 and 15 (red), CCPs 9 and 16 (cyan), and CCPs 3, 10, and 17 (blue) in CR1. (B) Backbone overlays of NMR-derived structures. In each case 24 structures are overlaid on Cα atoms of CCP 16 (mean structure). (C) Distribution of tilt, twist, and skew angles among the two ensembles of structures. Arrows show mean angles. (D) The structure (backbone; stereopair) closest to the mean of the CR1∼15,16 structures (red) overlaid on module 16 (Cα's) of the equivalent structure from the CR1∼16,17 ensemble (blue). Cell 2002 108, 769-780DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4)

Figure 2 Experimental NMR-Derived Data The top graph summarizes the data used for the structure calculations and the precision of the calculated structures. The number of distance restraints per residue are shown (bars, left-hand scale): sequential (residue i − residue i+1) in dark gray, short range (i−(i+(<5)) in green, and long range (i−(i+(>4)) in light gray. Root-mean-square deviations (rmsds) of the Cα coordinates of well-ordered residues in each module from its mean structure are plotted (o, lines, right-hand scale; 15,16 [red] and 16,17 [blue]) as is the Cα rmsd between the mean structures of (15)16 and 16(17) (black). Lower three graphs: 15N T1, heteronuclear NOEs, and 15N T2 for 15,16 (red) and 16,17 (blue) versus residue number. Mean ± SD is shown for each module by a horizontal black line (dotted for 16,17). Secondary structure is indicated. In the T2 panel, red (15,16) and blue (16,17) squares indicate residues mobile on μs–ms timescale (based on 15N T1 and T2). Cell 2002 108, 769-780DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4)

Figure 3 Modules and Intermodular Junctions of Site 2 In the center is shown a representation (Kraulis, 1991) of the CR1∼15–17; same view as in Figure 1. Eight side chains are shown in each module; parenthetical number (−3, +3, +5) indicates position relative to the conserved Gly at the N terminus of strand D. On the left, schematics illustrate occurrence (red lines) of intermodular and module-linker NOEs within the 15,16 (bottom) and 16,17 junctions. Dotted lines indicate one NOE, solid lines indicate more than one; thickness of line is proportional to number of NOEs. On the right are shown details of junctions (same view as on left) with backbone trace in red (15,16) or blue (16,17) and side chains atoms colored green, C; blue, N; red, O; and yellow, S. Cell 2002 108, 769-780DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4)

Figure 4 Mutations Mapped onto Surface of Site 2 Left: surface of CR1∼15–17 using color scheme (red, 15; cyan, 16; blue, 17), except where mutagenesis yielded no significant loss of C3b (iC3) binding or C4b binding (black), some loss of C3b (iC3) binding (aa 937, 1053) or C4b binding (aa 927, 929, 1046) (yellow), or major loss of C3b and/or C4b binding (white). Single asterisk indicates residues that, when incorporated at their equivalent positions in site 1 (i.e., D109N, N29K, and T14K), caused gain of C3b binding. Double asterisk indicates two residues (Y27S/G79D) that confer C3b binding activity when simultaneously inserted at their equivalent positions in site 1. Right: same features but rotated (about vertical axis) by 180°. Cell 2002 108, 769-780DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4)

Figure 5 Ligand Binding by Charge-Reverse Mutants in Site 2 (A) iC3-Sepharose (B) C4b-Sepharose One representative measurement of two-to-four is shown by each data point. In the case of C4b binding, mutants had binding values of ≤6% compared to the parent fragment. Results are expressed as a percentage of CR1 derivative bound to iC3-S or C4b-S of that initially offered to the Sepharose. Cell 2002 108, 769-780DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00672-4)