Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Modular Recognition of RNA by a Human Pumilio-Homology Domain
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Crystal Structure of Riboflavin Synthase
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1253-1263 (December 2001) Crystal Structure of Human AUH Protein, a Single-Stranded RNA Binding Homolog of Enoyl-CoA Hydratase  Kazuki Kurimoto, Shuya Fukai, Osamu Nureki, Yutaka Muto, Shigeyuki Yokoyama  Structure  Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1253-1263 (December 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4

Figure 1 Ribbon Representation of the AUH Hexamer Structure (a) The side view. The 3-fold axis is parallel to the paper. The six subunits are colored gray, orange, green, cyan, yellow, and magenta, respectively. (b) The top view. The 3-fold axis is perpendicular to the paper. The coloring scheme is the same as in (a). Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 2 Ribbon Representation of the AUH and Enoyl-CoA Hydratase Structures (a) Stereo view of the AUH structure. The α and 310 helices are colored brown, while the β strands are colored green. (b) Stereo view of the enoyl-CoA hydratase structure. The coloring scheme is the same as in (a). Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 3 Sequence Alignment of AUH, Enoyl-CoA Hydratase, and Dienoyl-CoA Isomerase The secondary structure elements of AUH are indicated above the sequences. The α and 310 helices are represented with the red and yellow bars, respectively. The β strands are represented with the green arrows. The numbers of the first residues of the secondary structure elements are shown under the bars and the arrows. The H2B α helices of enoyl-CoA hydratase and dienoyl-CoA isomerase, which have lengths that are different from that of AUH, are indicated above the respective sequences. The R peptide is represented with the inverted letters. The catalytic Glu residues are colored red. The residues involved in the trimer-trimer interactions (cutoff 3.5 Å) are represented with the white letters in the orange boxes. Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 4 The Manner of AUH Trimerization (a) Stereo view of the AUH trimer structure, from the viewpoint of the partner trimer. The subunits are colored cyan, yellow, and magenta, respectively. α helices involved in the subunit interactions to form the trimer (H2B, H4B, and H5 of the cyan-colored subunit and H8′ and H10′ of the magenta-colored subunit) are indicated. α helix H1, which faces the partner trimer together with α helices H2B, H8′, and H9′, is also indicated. (b) Stereo view of the AUH trimer structure, from the viewpoint opposite to that in (a). The coloring scheme is the same as in (a). Helices that constitute the active-site pocket (α helices H2A–H3 and 310 helix H4A of the cyan-colored subunit and H9′ and H10′ of the magenta-colored subunit) are indicated. Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 5 Active-Site Pockets of AUH and Enoyl-CoA Hydratase (a) Stereo view of the active-site pocket of AUH. Helices that constitute the active-site pocket (α helices H2A–H3 and 310 helix H4A of the cyan-colored subunit and H9′ and H10′ of the magenta-colored subunit) are indicated. Glu189 and Glu209, which are the counterparts of the catalytic residues of enoyl-CoA hydratase (Glu144* and Glu164*, respectively), are indicated with the stick representation. β strands B2 and B3, which are located around the active-site pocket, are also shown. (b) Stereo view of the active-site pocket of enoyl-CoA hydratase. The coloring scheme is the same as in (a). The catalytic residues, Glu144* and Glu164*, and the acetoacetyl-CoA molecule (gray) are indicated with the stick representation. (c) Close-up stereo view of the active-site pocket of AUH (green) superimposed on that of enoyl-CoA hydratase (yellow). Glu189 and Glu209 of AUH, Glu144* and Glu164* of enoyl-CoA hydratase, and the acetoacetyl-CoA molecule (gray) in the crystal structure of enoyl-CoA hydratase are shown. (d) Stereo view of the σa-weighted 2 |Fo| − |Fc| electron density map of the AUH active-site pocket. Glu189, Glu209, and the water molecule hydrogen bonded to them are indicated. Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 6 The Trimer-Trimer Interactions of AUH, Enoyl-CoA Hydratase, and Dienoyl-CoA Isomerase (a) Ribbon representation of a trimer of AUH, from the viewpoint of the partner trimer. α helices H1 and H2B are colored magenta and orange, respectively. α helices H8 and H9 are colored blue. (b) Surface representation of the AUH trimer, from the viewpoint of the partner trimer. The distances from the partner trimer are color coded from red (3.5 Å) to white (10 Å). (c) Surface representation of the enoyl-CoA hydratase trimer. (d) Surface representation of the dienoyl-CoA isomerase trimer. The coloring schemes of (c) and (d) are the same as in (b). Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 7 Electrostatic Surface Potentials of AUH and Enoyl-CoA Hydratase (a) Surface (upper) and ribbon (lower) representations of the AUH hexamer. The positive and negative charges are shown in blue and red, respectively, in the surface representation. 310 helix H0B and α helices H1, H2A, H2B, H7, and H10 are indicated with the white letters in the surface representation and are colored green, blue, magenta, orange, yellow, and cyan in the ribbon representation, respectively. (b) Surface and ribbon representations of the enoyl-CoA hydratase hexamer. The coloring scheme is the same as in (a). (c) Sequence alignments of AUH and enoyl-CoA hydratase around α helices H1, H2A, H2B, and H7B. α helices H1 and H7B are represented with the red bars above the respective sequences. α helices H2A and H2B of AUH and enoyl-CoA hydratase are shown above and below the sequence, respectively. The acidic and basic amino acid residues are represented with the white letters in the red and blue boxes, respectively. Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)

Figure 8 Proposed RNA Binding Scaffold of AUH (a) The lysine comb. Lys residues on α helix H1 (Lys105, Lys 109, Lys113, and Lys119) are represented with the yellow (carbon atoms) and blue (nitrogen atoms) sticks. (b) RNA binding activities of the GST-tagged wild-type and mutant K105N/K109E/K113Q AUH proteins, demonstrated by SDS-PAGE analysis after UV-crosslinking with 32P-labeled IL-3 ARE RNA. (c) Model of a 6 nucleotide single-stranded polyuridylate molecule bound between the two lysine combs. (d) Model of a long (39 nucleotide), single-stranded polyuridylate molecule winding along the AUH hexamer. In addition to the lysine comb, the basic amino acid residues that may interact with the RNA (Lys122, Lys160, and Lys319) are represented with the yellow and blue sticks. The coloring schemes of (c) and (d) are the same as in (a). Figures 1, 2, 4, 5a–5c, 6a, 7a, 7b (lower figures), 8a, 8c, and 8d were prepared using the programs Molscript [45] and Raster 3D [46]. Figure 5d was prepared using the program DINO (Philippsen, 2000, DINO: Visualizing Structural Biology. http://www.bioz.unibas.ch/~xray/dino). Figures 6b–6d, 7a, and 7b (upper figures) were prepared using the program GRASP [47]. Structure 2001 9, 1253-1263DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00686-4)