Giulia Quattrocolo, Gord Fishell, Timothy J. Petros  Cell Reports 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Sodium Entry during Action Potentials of Mammalian Neurons: Incomplete Inactivation and Reduced Metabolic Efficiency in Fast-Spiking Neurons  Brett C.
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Involvement of Mossy Cells in Sharp Wave-Ripple Activity In Vitro
Antonio Jesús Hinojosa, Rubén Deogracias, Beatriz Rico  Cell Reports 
Network-Level Control of Frequency Tuning in Auditory Cortex
Bidirectional Modification of Presynaptic Neuronal Excitability Accompanying Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity  Cheng-yu Li, Jiang-teng Lu, Chien-ping.
Volume 85, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Dante S. Bortone, Shawn R. Olsen, Massimo Scanziani  Neuron 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Jason Jacoby, Yongling Zhu, Steven H. DeVries, Gregory W. Schwartz 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain
Lineage Tracing Using Cux2-Cre and Cux2-CreERT2 Mice
A Pixel-Encoder Retinal Ganglion Cell with Spatially Offset Excitatory and Inhibitory Receptive Fields  Keith P. Johnson, Lei Zhao, Daniel Kerschensteiner 
Johanna Sigl-Glöckner, Michael Brecht  Cell Reports 
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Prefrontal and Auditory Input to Intercalated Neurons of the Amygdala
Gating of Fear in Prelimbic Cortex by Hippocampal and Amygdala Inputs
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Corey Baimel, Benjamin K. Lau, Min Qiao, Stephanie L. Borgland 
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Parvalbumin-Expressing GABAergic Neurons in Mouse Barrel Cortex Contribute to Gating a Goal-Directed Sensorimotor Transformation  Shankar Sachidhanandam,
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Receptive-Field Modification in Rat Visual Cortex Induced by Paired Visual Stimulation and Single-Cell Spiking  C. Daniel Meliza, Yang Dan  Neuron  Volume.
Elizabeth A.K. Phillips, Christoph E. Schreiner, Andrea R. Hasenstaub 
Ryan G. Natan, Winnie Rao, Maria N. Geffen  Cell Reports 
Xiaomo Chen, Marc Zirnsak, Tirin Moore  Cell Reports 
Sleep-Stage-Specific Regulation of Cortical Excitation and Inhibition
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Translaminar Cortical Membrane Potential Synchrony in Behaving Mice
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Han Xu, Hyo-Young Jeong, Robin Tremblay, Bernardo Rudy  Neuron 
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Organization of Functional Long-Range Circuits Controlling the Activity of Serotonergic Neurons in the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus  Li Zhou, Ming-Zhe Liu, Qing.
Differentiating Cerebellar Impact on Thalamic Nuclei
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Cell-Type Specificity of Callosally Evoked Excitation and Feedforward Inhibition in the Prefrontal Cortex  Paul G. Anastasiades, Joseph J. Marlin, Adam.
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Corticostriatal Transmission Is Selectively Enhanced in Striatonigral Neurons with Postnatal Loss of Tsc1  Katelyn N. Benthall, Stacie L. Ong, Helen S.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Xiaowei Chen, Nathalie L. Rochefort, Bert Sakmann, Arthur Konnerth 
Giulia Quattrocolo, Gord Fishell, Timothy J. Petros  Cell Reports 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Heterotopic Transplantations Reveal Environmental Influences on Interneuron Diversity and Maturation  Giulia Quattrocolo, Gord Fishell, Timothy J. Petros  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 721-731 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075 Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Transplanted MGE-Derived Interneurons Migrate and Mature Normally in Host Tissue (A) Schematic depicting the cortical and hippocampal regions isolated from P0–P2 mouse brains. (B) Coronal section through a P1 Nkx2.1-Cre;Ai9 brain showing the regions of cortex (orange) and hippocampus (blue) that were used for transplantations. (C) Flow cytometry dot plots of tomato+ interneurons from Nkx2.1-Cre;Ai9 cortex and hippocampus. (D) Schematic of different transplantation strategies. (E) Examples from P30 WT brains receiving homotopic tomato+ interneuron grafts at P1. (F) Two transplanted interneurons displaying characteristic interneuron morphology and markers of a PV+ basket cell and SST+ Martinotti cell. (G) Histogram depicting the percentage of cortically targeted transplanted tomato+ cells expressing either PV or SST. n = 5 brains for Ctx-to-Ctx and Hip-to-Ctx. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; scale bars, 200 μm in (B) and 50 μm in (E) and (F). Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Homotopically Grafted Interneurons Resemble Endogenous Interneurons (A) Cortex and hippocampus from endogenous Nkx2.1-Cre;Ai9 and grafted brains depicting tomato+ cells immunostained for SST (arrowheads), PV (arrows), and nNOS (open arrowheads). (B) Pie charts depicting the proportion of transplanted neurons expressing PV, SST, or nNOS in endogenous brains and homotopic grafts. n = 3 brains for endogenous cortex and hippocampus, 5 brains for Ctx-to-Ctx, 7 brains for Hip-to-Hip. (C) Pie charts depicting the proportion of transplanted interneurons classified based on their intrinsic firing properties. n = 19 cells Ctx-to-Ctx, 23 cells Hip-to-Hip. (D) Examples of the highest recorded firing frequencies of tomato+ cells in endogenous and homotopic conditions. For late spiking interneurons, the darker traces represent the first step at which firing was observed. Injected current steps for depicted traces: −100 pA and 520 pA (left panels); −100 pA and 520 pA (middle, top panel); −100 pA and 320 pA (middle, bottom panel); −100 pA, 60 pA (darker trace) and 520 pA (right, top panel); −100 pA, 40 pA (darker trace) and 520 pA (right, bottom panel). n = 20 cells endogenous cortex, 25 cells endogenous hippocampus, 18 cells Ctx-to-Ctx, 23 cells Hip-to-Hip. (E) Histograms depicting the highest firing frequency and input resistance in fast spiking interneurons from endogenous and Ctx-to-Ctx tomato+ cells. n = 13 cells endogenous cortex, 13 cells Ctx-to-Ctx. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.005; scale bars, 50 μm. See also Figures S1–S4. Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Host Region Determines the Class of Interneurons in Heterotopic Transplants (A) Images from heterotopic grafts (Ctx-to-Hip and Hip-to-Ctx) depicting tomato+ cells immunostained for various interneuron markers. Arrowheads, SST+ cells; open arrowheads, SST+/nNOS+ cells. (B) Pie charts depicting the proportion of transplanted neurons expressing PV, SST, or nNOS (left) and their firing properties (right) in heterotopic grafts. Markers, n = 5 brains Hip-to-Ctx, 3 brains Ctx-to-Hip. Ephys: n = 21 cells Hip-to-Ctx, 19 cells Ctx-to-Hip. (C) Examples of highest firing frequency patterns of late spiking cells recorded in heterotopic grafts, darker traces represent the first step at which firing was observed. Injected current steps for depicted traces: −100 pA, 40 pA (darker trace), and 520 pA (left); −100 pA, 60 pA (darker trace), and 400 pA (right). n = 2 cells Hip-to-Ctx, 3 cells Ctx-to-Hip. (D) Examples of sEPSCs recorded in non-fast spiking interneurons in homotopic (red) and heterotopic (pink) transplants. (E) Histograms depicting the frequency of non-fast spiking sEPSC. n = 4 cells Ctx-to-Ctx, 10 cells Hip-to-Ctx, 5 cells Hip-to-Hip, 7 cells Ctx-to-Hip. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Scale bar, 50 μm. See also Figures S1–S3. Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transplanted Interneurons Target Endogenous Pyramidal Cells Representative section from brain transplanted with Nkx2.1-Cre;Ai32 cells (YFP), with GABAergic postsynaptic currents evoked by blue light pulses recorded in adjacent pyramidal cells (red, biocytin). In black, average traces; in red, response recorded in the presence of Gabazine. n = 10 cells Ctx-to-Ctx, 5 cells Hip-to-Ctx. Scale bars, 50 μm. Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Subtype of Transplanted nNOS+ Cell Correlates with the Donor Brain Region (A) Nkx2.1-Cre;Ai9 endogenous cortex and Ctx-to-Ctx transplants stained with nNOS (arrowheads). Note that the targeted Ctx-to-Ctx injection was deep and some cells settled in the hippocampus, allowing for direct comparison of homotopic (Ctx-to-Ctx) and heterotopic (Ctx-to-Hip) nNOS+ cells in the same brain. (B) Histogram depicts the proportion of type I and type II cells in the endogenous cortex and hippocampus, and hippocampus targeted transplants. n = 3 brains endogenous cortex and hippocampus, 4 brains Ctx-to-Hip and Hip-to-Hip. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01; scale bars, 50 μm. See also Figures S5 and S6. Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cortex-Targeted Transplantations Are Characterized by a Larger Percentage of SST+/CR+ Grafted Interneurons (A) Calretinin expression (arrowheads) in endogenous and transplanted brains. (B) Histograms depicting the proportion of SST+ cells that express CR in endogenous and transplanted brains. n = 3 brains for all conditions except n = 4 brains for Hip-to-Hip. Data are represented as mean ± SEM; ∗p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.005; scale bars, 50 μm. See also Figures S5 and S6. Cell Reports 2017 21, 721-731DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.075) Copyright © 2017 Terms and Conditions