Identical Genomic Organization of Two Hemichordate Hox Clusters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phylogenomic Analysis of Spiders Reveals Nonmonophyly of Orb Weavers
Advertisements

Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 15, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages (October 2015)
Colponemids Represent Multiple Ancient Alveolate Lineages
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Adaptive Evolution of Gene Expression in Drosophila
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Archaea Current Biology
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Masayuki Haruta, Yoshio Hata  Current Biology 
Sing-Hang Cheung, Fang Fang, Sheng He, Gordon E. Legge  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages R911-R914 (November 2005)
The NK Homeobox Gene Cluster Predates the Origin of Hox Genes
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Coupling Genetic and Ecological-Niche Models to Examine How Past Population Distributions Contribute to Divergence  L. Lacey Knowles, Bryan C. Carstens,
Evolutionary Origin of the Medaka Y Chromosome
Molecular Phylogenetics and the Diversification of Hummingbirds
Origin of Immunoglobulin Isotype Switching
Size Polymorphisms in the Human Ultrahigh Sulfur Hair Keratin-Associated Protein 4, KAP4, Gene Family  Naoyuki Kariya, Yutaka Shimomura, Masaaki Ito 
Hox Gene Loss during Dynamic Evolution of the Nematode Cluster
Young Children Do Not Integrate Visual and Haptic Form Information
Functional Dissection of sRNA Translational Regulators by Nonhomologous Random Recombination and In Vivo Selection  Jane M. Liu, Joshua A. Bittker, Maria.
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Brain Evolution: Getting Better All the Time?
Gene Evolution: Getting Something from Nothing
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages e6 (December 2017)
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
The Adult Body Plan of Indirect Developing Hemichordates Develops by Adding a Hox- Patterned Trunk to an Anterior Larval Territory  Paul Gonzalez, Kevin.
Genomic Flatlining in the Endangered Island Fox
A Dwarf Male Reversal in Bone-Eating Worms
Evolution of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation and the Pursuit of Safer Sex
Cédric Finet, Ruth E. Timme, Charles F. Delwiche, Ferdinand Marlétaz 
The Derived FOXP2 Variant of Modern Humans Was Shared with Neandertals
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jeroen B. Smaers, Aida Gómez-Robles, Ashley N. Parks, Chet C. Sherwood 
Michael A. Rogers, Hermelita Winter, Christian Wolf, Jürgen Schweizer 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Claudio H Slamovits, Naomi M Fast, Joyce S Law, Patrick J Keeling 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Cetaceans on a Molecular Fast Track to Ultrasonic Hearing
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Identical Skin Toxins by Convergent Molecular Adaptation in Frogs
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
An Alternative Root for the Eukaryote Tree of Life
Matthew A. Campbell, Piotr Łukasik, Chris Simon, John P. McCutcheon 
Colponemids Represent Multiple Ancient Alveolate Lineages
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 23, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry
Zoology: A New Mouth for Amphioxus
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Michael S.Y. Lee, Julien Soubrier, Gregory D. Edgecombe 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Identical Genomic Organization of Two Hemichordate Hox Clusters Robert Freeman, Tetsuro Ikuta, Michael Wu, Ryo Koyanagi, Takeshi Kawashima, Kunifumi Tagawa, Tom Humphreys, Guang-Chen Fang, Asao Fujiyama, Hidetoshi Saiga, Christopher Lowe, Kim Worley, Jerry Jenkins, Jeremy Schmutz, Marc Kirschner, Daniel Rokhsar, Nori Satoh, John Gerhart  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages 2053-2058 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Molecular Phylogenetics of the Hemichordate Hox Genes A maximum-likelihood phylogram was constructed from the 60-amino-acid homeodomain sequences from 64 Hox genes, and using two NK2.1 genes as an outgroup. The Hox genes of the hemichordates P. flava and S. kowalevskii are shown in blue. Red circles indicate genes characterized anew in this study. PhyML was used (www.phylogeny.fr/version2_cgi/one_task.cgi?task_type=phyml; see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The aLRT branch support values are shown as percentage in red. Branches with support values under 50% were collapsed. Branch length is indicated by the bar in the lower right. Pf, Ptychodera flava; Sk, Saccoglossus kowalevskii; Sp, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus; Mr, Metacrinus rotundus (for hox4, which is absent in S. purpuratus); Am, Branchiostoma floridae (amphioxus); and Mm, Mus musculus. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 2053-2058DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Clustering of Hox Genes in Hemichordate Genomes Genomic regions ∼500 kb-long are shown for (A) Saccoglussus kowalevskii and (B) Ptychodera flava. Both contain the 12 genes Hox1 to Hox11/13b (blue arrows in the direction of transcription). In both, the ten genes Hox1–Hox11/13a are aligned in the same direction, whereas two genes, Hox11/13c and Hox11/13b, are in the opposite direction. Red bars indicate the position of mir10 genes, and the orange bar in (B) indicates a gap. BAC clones are shown as green lines, scaffolds or contigs obtained from whole-genome shotgun reads as purple lines, and PCR-amplified fragments as brown lines. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2012 22, 2053-2058DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Genomic Organization of Two Hemichordate Hox Clusters and Hypothetical Reconstructions of Hox Cluster of Ambulacrarian Ancestor Summary of Hox clusters of extant two hemichordates and one echinoderm (Ambulacraria) and two hypothetical reconstructions of the cluster of the ambulacrarian ancestor, arranged in a phylogenetic tree [1]. Hox gene location and transcriptional orientation are indicated by triangles, the colors of which represent the different categories of Hox genes: anterior (purple), group3 (yellow), central (green), and posterior (red). The mir10 locus is indicated by name, between hox4 and hox5. Note the identical organization of the five gene segment (hox6, hox7, hox8, hox9/10, hox11/13a) of the echinoderm (S. purpuratus, sea urchin) and hemichordate clusters (bounded by dashed lines). In the hypothetical cluster 1 (upper left), the minimal ancestral cluster is proposed to be the same as the extant hemichordate clusters, including the inverted hox11/13b,c pair of genes, Then, within the lineage to sea urchins, the cluster underwent rearrangements and gene loss (hox4) as well as an inversion and translocation of hox11/13c. In the hypothetical cluster 2 (lower left), the minimal ancestral cluster is proposed to be like that of hemichordates except that hox11/13b and hox11/13c are in tandem with the other genes, not inverted as a pair. Then within the echinoderm lineage, the cluster underwent rearrangements of hox1–5 and gene loss (hox4), as well as an inversion, but not translocation of hox11/13b, whereas hox11/13b and hox11/13c inverted as a pair in the hemichordate lineage. The proposal of the kinds of hox genes in the ancestral cluster is supported by the hox sequence repertoire across extant Ambulacraria [6, 18, 20, 21]. Whereas hox1–9 (called 9/10 in Ambulacraria) are orthologous to chordate genes 1–9, the ambulacrarian posterior genes 11/13a,b,c differ from vertebrate genes 11–13 and are identified here as AmbPa,b,c to indicate their ambulacrarian-specific ancestry. See also Figures S3 and S4. Current Biology 2012 22, 2053-2058DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.052) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions