Ethics: Theory and Practice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
Advertisements

Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Punishment.
Capital Punishment Punishment: The deliberate and authorized causing of pain or harm to someone thought to have broken a rule, code, law etc. Punishment:
Justice In orienting oneself to the concept of justice, three perspectives must be examined: the individual perspective concerned primarily with personal.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
ETHICAL APPROACHES JUSTICE ETHICS OF CARE RIGHTS UTILITARIANISM.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 4 Topic Outlines.
Chapter Seven: Capital Punishment Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION (ETHICAL THEORIES)
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Chapter 11 SENTENCING AND SANCTIONS 1. Purpose of Criminal Sanctions  Criminal Sanctions – A penalty imposed for violating accepted social norms. A sanction.
Ethical Principles: “Good” vs. “Right” Current Issues – LHS.
Criminal Law. Criminal law deals with the most serious kinds of harm that people can cause each other, or society. Although it is true that there are.
1 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility l an oxymoron?!?! l What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! l behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Chapter 4 The Nature and Aims of the Criminal Law.
Social Science. Society has a set of rules, enforced by the government, called laws Only rules that everyone has to follow One of the basic principles.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Ethics: Theory and Practice Jacques P. Thiroux Keith W. Krasemann.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
Capital Punishment Punishment by execution of someone officially judged to have committed a serious or capital crime Punishment by execution of someone.
Models of Justice: Retributive vs Restorative CLN4U.
‘UTILITARIANISM FROM BENTHAM & MILL’ THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Do Now: Consider the following statements. Identify whether they are true or false: It is moral to abide by the law. It is immoral to disobey the law.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
Criminal Law for the Criminal Justice Professional Norman M. Garland Third Edition Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
1 Business ethics and social responsibility (chapt. 10) an oxymoron?!?! What is GOOD vs. What is Bad! behaviour of business and the treatment of stakeholders.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society Week 2 Topic Outlines.
Models of Justice: Retributive vs Restorative CLN4U.
Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values
© 2012 Wanda Teays. All rights reserved. Rawls, like Kant, is a Deontological Ethicist. He emphasizes moral duty and obligations, rather than end goals.
Reward and Punishment.
How to Argue for Moral Premise Using Mills, Kant and Rawls to help your arguments.
Justice.
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Chapter 2 Discussion: Ethical Principles in Business
What is Ethics? Ethics: A code of moral principles used to set standards of “good” and “bad” Ethical Behavior: What is accepted as good and right according.
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Ethics: Theory and Practice
C H A P T E R T H R E.
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
universalizability & reversibility
Models of Justice: Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
C10: Punishment and Sentencing
Ethics: Theory and Practice
What is a crime? Write a brief definition.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
The Taking of Human Life
Three Dimensions of Justice
Theories of Punishment
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
Crime and Punishment Examples of crimes against a person
Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values
A Review of Principles DR. K. Smith, PharmD, MPH.
Concise Guide to Critical Thinking
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Social and economic inequalities are arranged so that they are both:
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
The rights and wrongs about morals
Presentation transcript:

Ethics: Theory and Practice Jacques P. Thiroux Keith W. Krasemann

Lying, Cheating, Breaking Promises, and Stealing Chapter Seven Reward and Punishment Chapter Twelve Lying, Cheating, Breaking Promises, and Stealing

Definition of Key Terms Retributive Justice: People should get what they deserve either in reward or punishment, regardless of the consequences Distributive Justice: The distribution of good and bad on a just and fair basis Reward: Something given or received for worthy behavior

Definition of Key Terms Punishment: The act of penalizing someone for a crime, fault, or misbehavior – a penalty for wrongdoing Retributivism (deserts theory): The act of giving people what they deserve, regardless of the consequences

Definition of Key Terms Utilitarianism (results theory): The act of rewarding or punishing based upon the results of the act and whether or not it brings about the greatest good consequences for the greatest number of people Restitution (compensation theory): The act of compensating victims for harm or wrong done to them

Reward Four basic ways in which good and bad can be distributed: As equally among people as possible According to people’s abilities According to what they deserve or merit According to their needs

Theories of How to Reward Retributivist, or deserts, theory states that people should be rewarded strictly on a basis of what they deserve or merit for what they have done in the past Utilitarian, or results, theory would reward on the future good consequences of rewarding

John Rawls and His Theory of Justice Natural Rights v. Rights of a Just Society Rawls believes such rights are given to humans by a just society, developed behind a “veil of ignorance”

John Rawls and His Theory of Justice Rawl’s two basic principles Equality principle: Each person has equal rights to maximum liberty compatible with the same amount of liberty for everyone else Difference principle: Inequality is permissible if it’s to everyone’s advantage

Punishment Four Requirements: It must involve unpleasantness of some sort It must be imposed or endured for some reason It must be imposed by some person or group that has “duly constituted” moral or legal authority It must be imposed according to certain rules or laws

Theories of Punishment Retributive (deserts) theory states that punishment should be given only when it is deserved and only to the extent that it is deserved; it is concerned with the past rather than the future

Theories of Punishment Utilitarian (results) theory is future oriented and given in order that. . . rather than because of . . . as in retributivism Consequences: Imprisonment is not conducive to rehabilitation and reform Psychiatric or psychological treatment, rather than punishment, also is ineffectual

Theories of Punishment Restitution, or compensation for victims, theory holds that justice is served only if victims are granted restitution for the crimes committed against them

Synthesis No one who is innocent should be convicted or punished despite any good consequences coming from the punishment People must truly deserve any punishment they get, and it should fit the crime but not be excessive More serious crimes would require more serve punishment

Human Rights The promotion of human rights is a widely accepted project The concept of a right is powerful because it allows the bearer to make claims on others The importance of the contributions of human rights to civilization cannot be underestimated

Lying, Cheating, and Stealing Lying is an intentionally deceptive message in the form of a statement or piece of information deliberately presented as being true – anything meant to deceive or give a wrong impression White lie Lies of Commission Lies of Omission

Lying, Cheating, and Stealing Cheating is deceiving by trickery, swindling, misleading, and acting dishonestly or practicing fraud

Lying, Cheating, and Stealing A promise is a declaration or vow that one will or will not do something, and to break a promise is to fail to conform to or to act contrary to or violate the promise Stealing is taking something without right or permission, generally in a surreptitious way