Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ANALYSIS OF STATICALLY DETERMINATE STRUCTURES
Advertisements

Indeterminate Structure Session Subject: S1014 / MECHANICS of MATERIALS Year: 2008.
Chapter 12 Deflection of beams and shafts
Chapter 4 AXIAL LOADING.
ME 221Lecture 251 ME 221 Statics Lecture #25 Sections 5.1 – 5.7.
Elastic Curves of Beams. Basic Equations for Beam Deflection.
Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
Deflections of Beams and Shafts Deflection and slope are sometimes the limiting factors in beam and shaft design. Methods for solving deflection and problems.
SHEAR AND MOMENT DIAGRAMS WITH APPLICATIONS IN TWO ORTHOGONAL PLANES
9 Deflection of Beams.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
Deflections of Beams and Shafts
9 Deflection of Beams.
5. ANALYSIS OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES BY FORCE METHOD
CIVL3310 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
CE 329 Structural Analysis Spring Objectives ― General List Course Objectives Describe Topical Coverage for Class Provide the Formula for Computing.
Sample Problem 9.8 For the uniform beam and loading shown, determine the reaction at each support and the slope at end A. SOLUTION: Release the “redundant”
An introduction to the finite element method using MATLAB
Determinacy and Stability of Structures
Review Conjugate beam method Prepaid by:
Eng Ship Structures 1 Matrix Analysis Using MATLAB Example.
Eng. Tamer Eshtawi First Semester
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
MAE 314 – Solid Mechanics Yun Jing
By Prof. Dr. Wail Nourildean Al-Rifaie
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd
In-span loads on beam elements So far we have only been able to apply loads at nodes. example How do we then tackle loads away from nodes, or continuous.
Structural Analysis 7 th Edition in SI Units Russell C. Hibbeler Chapter 10: Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Force Method.
Copyright Joseph Greene 2003 All Rights Reserved 1 CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 17: Statically Indeterminate Beams Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO.
MEC 0011 Statics Lecture 4 Prof. Sanghee Kim Fall_ 2012.
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis, 3/e By Kenneth Leet, Chia-Ming Uang, and Anne Gilbert Lecture Outline.
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Superposition & Statically Indeterminate Beams
Chapter four: Structures
Stress and Strain – Axial Loading
Solid Mechanics Course No. ME213.
Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies
Solving Linear Inequalities in One Unknown
PROCLAIM !!! IN THE NAME OF THY LORD WHO CREATETH.
*12.4 SLOPE & DISPLACEMENT BY THE MOMENT-AREA METHOD
Sample Problem 9.8 For the uniform beam and loading shown, determine the reaction at each support and the slope at end A. SOLUTION: Release the “redundant”
Deflections using energy methods
9 Deflection of Beams.
STATICS (ENGINEERING MECHANICS-I)
EQUATIONS OF EQUILIBRIUM & TWO- AND THREE-FORCE MEMEBERS
Solving One Step Equations
Chapter 4 EQUILIBRIUM OF RIGID BODIES
Determinacy and Stability of Structures
STATICS (ENGINEERING MECHANICS-I)
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Determine deformation of axially loaded members
CHAPTER 1 Force Analysis. Deformation Analysis.
Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies
Schilick’s formula for Calculating ships Hull frequency
Structural Analysis II
Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
Describe & Apply Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion (Force-Pairs)
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208
Equilibrium of Rigid Bodies
Statics Course Code: CIVL211 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Structural Analysis II
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
Bölüm 4 Rijit Cisimlerin Dengesi
Presentation transcript:

Eng. 6002 Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis Lecture 9: Review of Indeterminate Beams

Overview The internal forces in indeterminate structures cannot be obtained by statics alone. This is most easily understood by considering a similar statically determinate structure and then adding extra supports This way also suggests a general technique for analyzing elastic statically indeterminate structures

Statically Indeterminate Beams A uniformly loaded beam is shown with three simple supports. If there had been only two supports the beam would have been statically determinate So we imagine the same beam with one of the supports removed and replaced by some unknown force X

Statically Indeterminate Beams If the center support were removed the beam would sag as illustrated The sag at the centre is counteracted by the reaction force X1, providing an upward displacement Note: the subscript 0 is used to denote displacements generated by the original external load on the statically determinate structure

Statically Indeterminate Beams In the original statically indeterminate structure there is no vertical displacement of the centre due to the support Thus, the force X1 must have a magnitude that exactly counteracts the sag of the beam without the centre support

Statically Indeterminate Beams There are two approaches for solving indeterminate systems. Both approaches use the principle of superposition, by dividing the problem into two simpler problems, soling the simpler problems and adding the two solutions. The first method is called the Force Method (also called the Flexibility Method). The idea for the force method is;

Statically Indeterminate Beams The idea for the force method is: Step 1. Reduce the structure to a statically determinate structure. This step allows the structure to displace where it was formerly fixed. Step 2. solve each determinate system, to find all reactions and deflections. Note all incompatible deflections Step 3. re-solve the determinate structures with only a set of self-balancing internal unit forces at removed reactions. This solves the system for the internal or external forces removed in 1. Step 4. scale the unit forces to cause the opposite of the incompatible deflections Step 5. Add solutions (everything: loads, reactions, deflections…) from 2 and 4.