Erratum to “Reconstructed three-dimensional MR images: application to simulated tibial plateau depression fractures” [Radiography 10 (2) (2004) 95–101] Andrew P. Kurmis, John P. Slavotinek Radiography Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 311-312 (November 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2004.08.001 Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Perspex spacing sheets [top sheet outlined with dotted line] (a) with separated condylar fragments; and (b) showing fragments in position prior to MR imaging. Radiography 2004 10, 311-312DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2004.08.001) Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Schematic representation of proximal tibia showing resected fragments (A and B), perpendicular scan blocks (parallel lines) and perspex spacing sheets (C). Radiography 2004 10, 311-312DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2004.08.001) Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 A magnified static representation of the proximal tibia showing displacement of resected fragment A and the corresponding perspex spacer (C). The depression of the fracture fragment was measured as indicated (arrows). Radiography 2004 10, 311-312DOI: (10.1016/j.radi.2004.08.001) Copyright © 2004 The College of Radiographers Terms and Conditions