Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydration sites in purine·purine·pyrimidine and pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplexes in aqueous solution  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel 
Advertisements

Structure of TAR RNA Complexed with a Tat-TAR Interaction Nanomolar Inhibitor that Was Identified by Computational Screening  Zhihua Du, Kenneth E Lind,
The loop E–loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Huifang Huang, Stephen C Harrison, Gregory L Verdine 
Structures of Mismatch Replication Errors Observed in a DNA Polymerase
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Solution structure of a pyrimidine·purine·pyrimidine DNA triplex containing T·AT, C+ ·GC and G·TA triples  Ishwar Radhakrishnan, Dinshaw J Patel  Structure 
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Localization of bound water in the solution structure of a complex of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 with DNA  G.Marius Clore, Ad Bax, James.
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Encapsulating Streptomycin within a Small 40-mer RNA
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 1994)
Jie Ji, Michael E Hogan, Xiaolian Gao  Structure 
Michael Adrian, Fernaldo Richtia Winnerdy, Brahim Heddi, Anh Tuân Phan 
The Solution Structure of an AlcR-DNA Complex Sheds Light onto the Unique Tight and Monomeric DNA Binding of a Zn2Cys6 Protein  Bertrand Cahuzac, Rachel.
Solution Structure of a Unique G-Quadruplex Scaffold Adopted by a Guanosine-Rich Human Intronic Sequence  Vitaly Kuryavyi, Dinshaw J. Patel  Structure 
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Solution structure of a HNA–RNA hybrid
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Quentin Vicens, Eric Westhof  Structure 
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Comparison of X-Ray Crystal Structure of the 30S Subunit-Antibiotic Complex with NMR Structure of Decoding Site Oligonucleotide-Paromomycin Complex  Stephen.
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Subdomain Interactions Foster the Design of Two Protein Pairs with ∼80% Sequence Identity but Different Folds  Lauren L. Porter, Yanan He, Yihong Chen,
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
The structure of the complex of plastocyanin and cytochrome f, determined by paramagnetic NMR and restrained rigid-body molecular dynamics  Marcellus.
Unmasking the Annexin I Interaction from the Structure of Apo-S100A11
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Solution structure and base pair opening kinetics of the i-motif dimer of d(5mCCTTTACC): a noncanonical structure with possible roles in chromosome stability 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures of the pol β apoenzyme (3UXN-A (5)), binary complex (3ISB (30)) with ... Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures.
RecA-Binding pilE G4 Sequence Essential for Pilin Antigenic Variation Forms Monomeric and 5′ End-Stacked Dimeric Parallel G-Quadruplexes  Vitaly Kuryavyi,
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 441-452 (April 2000) A high-resolution structure of a DNA–chromomycin–Co(II) complex determined from pseudocontact shifts in nuclear magnetic resonance  Miriam Gochin  Structure  Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 441-452 (April 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6

Figure 1 The chromomycin chemical structure showing the residue numbering. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 2 13C–1H heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence spectra of d(TTGGCCAA)2 complexed with chromomycin and cobalt (left) or zinc (right). Spectra were recorded at 500 MHz and 25°C. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 3 (a) View into the minor groove of 1d83 and (b) the minimized average structure obtained from pseudocontact shift+NOE refinement. The DNA is represented as a molecular surface, with bases and the backbone shown in green and magenta, respectively, for (a) 1d83, and in cyan and red, respectively, for (b) the shift-based structure. Chromomycin is shown as a stick figure bound in the minor groove, and is orange in 1d83 and yellow in the shift-based structure. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 4 The central four base pairs G3–C6, G13–C16 of the DNA in the complex with chromomycin-A3 and divalent metal in (a) the original published PDB structure 1d83 and (b) the new shift-based structure. Backbone atoms are shown in light grey and bases in dark grey. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 5 DNA helix axis representation for the DNA in the complex with chromomycin-A3 and divalent metal in the original PDB structure of (a) d(AAGGCCTT)2 and (b) the shift-based structure of d(TTGGCCAA)2. Axes were calculated using Curves 5.1 [17]. Also indicated is the distance between penultimate base pairs of each DNA segment. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 6 Detailed regions of the structure of the DNA with chromomycin-A3. (a) A segment G13–G14–C15 of DNA and parts of the chromophore residue chr23, as well as A sugar A22 and E sugar E34 of the drug, drawn to illustrate the steric interaction of methyl groups on the drug. On the left is 1d83 in magenta (DNA backbone), green (bases) and orange (drug) and on the right is the shift-based structure in red (DNA backbone), cyan (bases) and yellow (drug). (b) Hydrogen-bonding network between the C36, D35, E34 trisaccharide segment of one drug molecule and the A22 sugar of the second, as well as to the non-hydrogen-bonded amino protons on G13 and G14. Only exchangeable protons involved in hydrogen bonds appear explicitly. Protons shown in yellow are slowly exchanging in the NMR. Carbon atoms shown in green have attached protons that exhibit NOEs to D-HO4 in Figure 7. All other atoms are color coded in grey (carbon, phosphorus), red (oxygen), blue (nitrogen) and white (hydrogen). On the left is the hydrogen-bonding in 1d83, and on the right in the shift-based structure (see text). Hydrogen bonds are drawn for distances of less than 2.5 Å. (c) Superposition of three shift+NOE based minimized average structures (see text) at the chromophore ring atoms of chr33, in order to demonstrate sidechain orientations consistent with all data. Possible hydrogen bonds between chromophore sidechain HO4′ and a phosphate oxygen at the C5–C6 step, and between the sidechain HO3′ (one structure only) and a phosphate oxygen at the C6–A7 step are shown. Atoms are color coded as in (b). Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)

Figure 7 Portion of the NOESY spectrum of a 2 mM sample of d(TTGGCCAA)2 with chromomycin-A3 and Co2+ in 90% H2O, 10% D2O, showing NOE connectivities between the slowly exchanging HO4 proton on the D-sugar and protons on the A, D and E sugars. Structure 2000 8, 441-452DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00124-6)