Questions Peter Prowse.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
Advertisements

Preparing for the Transfer John S.A. Edwards, PhD., Dr honoris causa (Örebro University, Sweden) Professor of Foodservice Foodservice and Applied Nutrition.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Professor Stanley Marshall Makuza Dean, School of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology.
SELLING YOUR DOCTORAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME Dr. Chris Burton & Steph Dolben Graduate School College of Health and Behavioural Sciences.
Masters Level Assessment of Teaching and Learning C r e a t i v i t y without  What should we do?
Research Examiner Training Programme Examining the Thesis.
FedEx Corporation Must be included:
Business research methods: data sources
Everything you need to know to write ‘excellence’ essays.
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
INTRODUCTION TO GRADUATE STUDIES AND WRITING. Mailing List Subscription Post
Masters Level Modules Ros Ollin School of Education and Professional Development University of Huddersfield.
From description to analysis
Yr 7.  Pupils use mathematics as an integral part of classroom activities. They represent their work with objects or pictures and discuss it. They recognise.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH DESIGN
Managing Corporate Reputation Sarah Williams Senior Examiner December 2013 / March 2014 Assignment Brief.
S ELF A WARENESS AND C AREER M ANAGEMENT Week 1. J UST IMAGINE.... It’s early September 2016, its sunny and warm, you are surrounded by family and friends.
Writing up your thesis - when writing up your thesis you should keep in mind at all times that a good thesis: 1. has question(s) underpinning the whole.
Scholarship English a few reminders Section A Section B and C what/how to revise what’s your game plan? plan 2 essays in 20 minutes.
What we talk about when we talk about research into teaching … or research-informed teaching... or research for learning… Presentation by Richard Bond.
Phase C.
Psychology of Emotion Revision
From field experience to success in the new GCSE examinations
NEEDS ASSESSMENT HRM560 Sheikh Rahman
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Planning an Essay.
Academic Writing: Arguments and Reviews
Research Skills.
A review of the literature
Advanced Higher Modern Languages
Critical Thinking Study Skills Academy 2016/17.
COM 705 OUTLET Experience Tradition/com705outlet.com
COM 705 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
AS to A Level Understanding the standard
Study of Religion.
Answering exam questions GCSE Physical Education
Albanian Qualification Framework Warsaw – September 2016
Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Elisabeth Lonergan, PhD Professor – Animal Science
Structuring the independent fieldwork investigation
Critical Essays Learning Intention:
Applied Research Methods (ARMs) ARMS 1 – Critical Reading & Writing
What Makes a Good Paragraph? Holland Park SHS
Literature reviews and reading lists
1.
What we talk about when we talk about research into teaching
Critical Analysis CHAPTER 7.
LAW112 Assessment 3 Haley McEwen.
Final PROJECT in translation (1)
Literature Review: UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND
AS LEVEL Paper One – Section A / B
Wm. Paul Meahan Melissa Barnard Andrew Wilson
Welcome to Keele University
LQ: Can I explain the factors which shape my identity?
Mechanical Engineering
The Subject/Literature Review
Year 10 Research Action Plan
History Assessments – Paper 2
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
A LEVEL Paper Three– Section A
The Thematic Essay Questions set will require coverage of the whole period, which will be of at least 100 years. The whole period will not need to be covered.
Chapter 3 Critically reviewing the literature
Analyse a significant historical trend and the force(s) that influenced it (3.6)
Briefing on FHS 2019 ‘Igor Stravinsky and the Twentieth Century’
The Subject/Literature Review
Managing People: Essay Guidance 2018/19
Summary of Evidence/Reason for Referral
Presentation transcript:

Questions Peter Prowse

Questions The length of the essay MUST NOT EXCEED 2000 words.   Examine the Situational Factors in the Harvard Model of HRM. How can these Situational Factors shape the commitment strategies of an organisation? Justify your answer with examples. Dave Ulrich (1997) advocated the increasing importance of an ‘HR community’ which includes, amongst others, the use of line managers in HR delivery. Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of increasing line manager involvement in HR delivery. Good leadership can be ‘created’ within the business through effective HR policies and practices. Discuss. Can the term `Human Resource Planning` be linked to `best practice` in successful organisations? How can the development of `high performance work practices` contribute to organisational success?

Structure- Have You Demonstrated Planning? Introduction define question descriptive stage Literature-research key literature see recommended text and start there Critical Analysis digging down in topic exploring peoples ideas and comparing and contrasting them. Justify why you adopt a position and the topic Conclusion summarising what you have said Don’t forget to reference essays in Harvard style

Standard Manual para 3.4 0-19 A substantial failure to demonstrate a systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study 20-39 A significant failure to demonstrate a systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline.

Pass 40-49 Achievement of a threshold level of attainment at level 3 by demonstrating a basic but systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline. A basic ability to deploy accurately established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline.

50-59% Achievement of a threshold level of attainment at level 3 by demonstrating a satisfactory but systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline. A satisfactory ability to deploy accurately established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline. A satisfactory demonstration of a conceptual understanding that enables the student: to devise and sustain arguments, and/or to solve problems, using ideas and techniques, some of which are at the forefront of a discipline to describe and comment upon particular aspects of current research, or equivalent advanced scholarship, in the discipline. A satisfactory appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge.

60-69% Achievement well above the threshold level of attainment at level 3 by demonstrating a good and systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline.

70-84% Achievement substantially above the threshold level of attainment at level 3 by demonstrating an excellent and systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline. An excellent ability to deploy accurately established techniques of analysis and enquiry within a discipline. An excellent demonstration of a conceptual understanding that enables the student: to devise and sustain arguments, and/or to solve problems, using ideas and techniques, some of which are at the forefront of a discipline to describe and comment upon particular aspects of current research, or equivalent advanced scholarship, in the discipline. An excellent appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity and limits of knowledge. An excellent ability to manage their own learning, and to make use of scholarly reviews and primary sources (for example, refereed research articles and/or original materials appropriate to the discipline). An excellent ability to apply the methods and techniques that they have learned.

85-100% Outstanding achievement above the threshold level of attainment at level 3 by demonstrating an outstanding and systematic understanding of key aspects of their field of study, including acquisition of coherent and detailed knowledge, at least some of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of defined aspects of a discipline.

ELS-Resources Read the resources on essays http://www.bradford.ac.uk/management/student-services-and-facilities/effective-learning-service/resources/writing-skills/critical-analysis/ How to Reference http://www.bradford.ac.uk/management/student-services-and-facilities/effective-learning-service/resources/referencing-and-plagiarism/how-to-online-tool/

Any questions?