Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Force limits and layout design.

A battery-free microorigami robotic arm.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Soft robotic VAD concept.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Force limits and layout design.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Fig. 2 Preserved long-term functionality of the TEHVs over 1-year follow-up as assessed by ICE and cardiac MRI flow measurements. Preserved long-term functionality.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers. 2D motility characterization and external magnetic steering of RBC microswimmers.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Schematic representation of MT sorting under a given electric field.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.

Fig. 1 Reference-fixing experiment, setup.

Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Experimental setup for HIL Bayesian optimization.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

Technological framework of the multidirectional gravity-assist

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Fig. 5. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity in Taiwan HCCs. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Force and angular speed profiles in the normal collision (contact angle, 90°) at 1.2 m/s for the naked and origami-protected configurations on the rough.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Presentation transcript:

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16. Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16. For (A) to (C), the left side of the graphs presents data for each week (sessions 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15), and the right side presents data for sessions 1 and 16, which have the same walking speed. From sessions 1 to 15, the treadmill speed was increased every first session of each week, as described in Materials and Methods. (D) EMG is scaled with the maximum value of baseline in session 1. (E) Trunk angle during walking. (F) The definition of the GRF difference is illustrated, and its group value is presented in (G). Mean and SEs are presented for six participants (n = 6), except EMG (n = 5). J. Kang et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan2634 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works