J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-06-31e WLTP correction algorithms progress report from TUG (chassis dynamometer corrections) and TNO (coast down corrections) preliminary results.
Advertisements

Flow chart A,B EMW Test 1 R EMW1 > L Rejected Yes R EMW1 > 0.9 L EMW Test 2 * R EMW2 > L Yes Accepted No EMW : typically tested by TVH with emission worst.
OIL#19 Alternative warm-up procedure (JAPAN proposal) 14th of January, 2015 WLTP rev1e.
WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
WLTP drive trace normalization
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 Serge Dubuc, WLTP GTR 15 Drafting Coordinator WLTP-09-26e.
Applicability of Driving Index
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-094 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
Status Report of the WLTP coasting TF
Comment from Japan for Normalization item “Deviation from target speed” WLTP-09-24e.
WLTP normalization rotational Mass
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Fuel Consumption calculations for ICE vehicles. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-08-07e.
Progress report of e-Lab sub-group (WLTP rev1e)
WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
WLTP DRAFTING TF, "RECORDED" BMW, Christoph Lueginger DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MEASURED AND RECORDED.
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
GS/ESC | 21/05/2014 | © Robert Bosch GmbH All rights reserved, also regarding any disposal, exploitation, reproduction, editing, distribution, as.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
André Rijnders RDW (NL) and Ernst Peter Weidmann ACEA-LCV
Agenda item IV 5 th GFV meeting  2-days meeting on the 4 and 5 March 2009 in Brussels, (European Commission offices) 6 th GFV meeting  26 May 2009 in.
Assessment Criteria for the Acceptability of Cycle and Testing Procedure Informal working document DTP Subgroup LabProcICE slide 1 Assessment Criteria.
1 WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B Issue: Handling of Manual Mode with Automatic Transmission. ACEA Informal Document WLTP-06-17e.
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi.
2016/4/25 Japan Automobile Research Institute 11 Asian Round Robin Test WLTP-IWG April 2016 Prepared by JAPAN WLTP-14-11e.
Status report about the work of the task force on gearshift issues
Study on Drive Trace Index of Electrified Vehicles
INTEGERS AND ABSOLUTE VALUE
WLTP Informal Working Group
WLTP Informal Working Group
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Drafting Subgroup Meeting Part of IWG #16, The Hague, October 2016
Draft Dyno requirements for GTR (proposal broadly as per CFR § )
Informal document No. GRPE (70th GRPE, January 2015, agenda item 3(b))
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act June 14th, 2017
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Driving Indices and correction of test cycle flexibilities
Submitted by the expert from OICA
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Submitted by the experts of OICA
Informal document GRPE-78-14
Status report Dual-Axis dyno taskforce
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Alessandro Marotta Stefanos Tsiakmakis
Meeting of the Steering Group for Simulation Issues from the last SGS meeting in LAT model development Munich, 25 July 2014 Biagio Ciuffo Georgios.
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
WLTP Correlation engine modeling
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act July 18th, 2017
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-209
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017
1. Summary # items RESULTS status remarks EV_1 HEV system power
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Biagio Ciuffo Georgios Fontaras Stefanos Tsiakmakis Alessandro Marotta
WLTP GTR 15 WLTP-09-18e Report by Drafting Coordinator, Serge Dubuc
Proposal for aerodynamic options
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
WLTP Open Issue Phase 1B OIL #25: Chassis dynamometer calibration –
Title : Alternative warm-up procedure WLTP rev1e by Japan
WLTP CoP Procedure for CO2/FC
Presentation transcript:

J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017 Update on correction of test cycle flexibilities J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act March 15th, 2017

Agenda Responses to comments received; Further alignment with TNO report; Future steps.

Responses to comments received Some dyno speed signals can also have negative values; They should be corrected to 0 before using them for distance and average speed calculations The JRC distance calculation is based on actual speed; The average speed shall be used for distance calculation in order to be in line with GTR#15 The JRC use energy (kWs) instead of power (kW) for Veline determination; That is also corrected for consistency reasons

Responses to comments received Dyno and OBD vehicle speed profiles are different and result in different corrections; Dyno speed profile shall be used and not OBD since it is more accurate than OBD and aligned with CO2 results; When comparing correction results of 1Hz and 10Hz speed profile for the same test results are slightly different; That is correct and therefore we should agree to use always 10Hz dyno speed profiles (as required for drive indexes). 10Hz profile will give us better insight into driving behaviour during the test.

Further alignment with TNO report JRC used only positive power for the calculation of actual and target power and for correction; Instead, in TNO report is used power that is higher than “P_Overrun” (power at zero fuel flow).

Further alignment with TNO report The opposite correction is overestimated

Future steps JRC will update the tool in the next days and distribute to the group; Text for corrections is also in preparation phase.