Catherine Suski, Kenneth J. Marians  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MBB 407/511 Lecture 21: Eukaryotic DNA Replication Nov. 29, 2005.
Advertisements

A Replisome Primase Primosome DNA Polymerase III acts here
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Mahadeb Pal, Alfred S. Ponticelli, Donal S. Luse  Molecular Cell 
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Zhiyu Li, Alfonso Mondragón, Russell J DiGate  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
David T. Long, Vladimir Joukov, Magda Budzowska, Johannes C. Walter 
The DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Smita Shankar, Asma Hatoum, Jeffrey W. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
DNA Polymerases at the Replication Fork in Eukaryotes
The RecF Protein Antagonizes RecX Function via Direct Interaction
Bacteriophage T4 Proteins Replicate Plasmids with a Preformed R Loop at the T4 ori(uvsY) Replication Origin In Vitro  Nancy G Nossal, Kathleen C Dudas,
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Ram Madabhushi, Kenneth J. Marians  Molecular Cell 
Characterization of a Triple DNA Polymerase Replisome
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Reconstitution of the B
Eukaryotic Transcription Activation: Right on Target
DNA Replication: Keep Moving and Don't Mind the Gap
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 1, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
A Hand-Off Mechanism for Primosome Assembly in Replication Restart
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Branch Migrating Sister Chromatid Junctions Form at Replication Origins through Rad51/Rad52-Independent Mechanisms  Massimo Lopes, Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino,
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Coupling of a Replicative Polymerase and Helicase: A τ–DnaB Interaction Mediates Rapid Replication Fork Movement  Sungsub Kim, H.Garry Dallmann, Charles.
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Structural Analysis of DNA Replication Fork Reversal by RecG
Recombinational DNA Repair: The RecF and RecR Proteins Limit the Extension of RecA Filaments beyond Single-Strand DNA Gaps  Brian L Webb, Michael M Cox,
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Amanda Solem, Nora Zingler, Anna Marie Pyle  Molecular Cell 
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Daniel L. Kaplan, Mike O'Donnell  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages e9 (April 2019)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Multiple Rad5 Activities Mediate Sister Chromatid Recombination to Bypass DNA Damage at Stalled Replication Forks  Eugen C. Minca, David Kowalski  Molecular.
Modulation of RNA Polymerase by (p)ppGpp Reveals a RecG-Dependent Mechanism for Replication Fork Progression  Peter McGlynn, Robert G Lloyd  Cell  Volume.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
DNA Polymerase V and RecA Protein, a Minimal Mutasome
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Presentation transcript:

Resolution of Converging Replication Forks by RecQ and Topoisomerase III  Catherine Suski, Kenneth J. Marians  Molecular Cell  Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 779-789 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Pathways of Resolution of Replicating Sister DNA Molecules The example shows θ-type replication of a supercoiled DNA template (i). Late replication intermediates (ii) can be resolved by one of two pathways. In pathway A, replication continues through the region of unreplicated parental DNA, generating duplex catenanes for each duplex turn of DNA replicated (iii). Once the gaps in the sister DNA molecules are sealed (iv), these topologically linked sister DNAs can only be decatenated by a type II topoisomerase to give the final product DNA (v). In pathway B, unlinking by a type I topoisomerase is concurrent with replication through the region of unreplicated parental DNA (vi), generating two form II sister DNA molecules (vii) that can then be sealed to give the final product DNA (v). This figure is reproduced from Minden and Marians (1986). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Resolution of Converging, Stalled Replication Forks by RecQ and Topo III (A) Schematic of LRI preparation and resolution. pBROTB I or II 535-80 plasmid DNA (i) is replicated in the presence of Tus, generating an LRI (ii) where the 3′ OH ends of the nascent leading strands of the converging replication forks are separated by about 130 bp (iv). Treatment of the LRI with RecQ and Topo III yields two gapped, form II sister DNA molecules. (B) Products of the replication reaction in either the absence or presence of Tus. (C) The LRI resolution reaction. Reaction mixtures containing 5 nM RecQ, 8 nM Topo III, and 400 nM SSB, as indicated, were incubated and analyzed as described in the Experimental Procedures. A note about topology of the LRI: if all the LRI synthesized during the replication reaction had formed perfectly, when RecQ unwinds the LRI one would expect to observe a single band at the 13th rung of the ladder of ss catenanes. Such perfect synthesis of the LRI would require that Tus never dissociates from the Ter sites, that the replisome dissociates instantly when it stalls at Tus, and that DNA polymerase I, which is capable of strand-displacement synthesis and is present in the reaction mixture, does not gain access to the 3′ OH ends of the nascent DNA. However, this is not what happens during the 15 min incubation used to accumulate LRI product. Replication of any particular plasmid template takes about 5 s. We have shown previously that stalled replisomes that were formed at and progressed away from oriC in this plasmid replication system in vitro have a half-life of about 4 min (Marians et al., 1998). Thus, if Tus dissociates, the stalled replisomes are able to progress through the parental region between the two Ter sites. This progression, however, is limited by the inability of DNA gyrase, the only topoisomerase in the reaction mixture, to bind ahead of the replication forks to remove positive supercoils. In addition, DNA polymerase I might extend the 3′ OH ends. Consequently, the LRI actually consists of a distribution of almost completely replicated daughter molecules with differing extents of unreplicated parental DNA between the two Ter sites. Unwinding by RecQ in the absence of unlinking by Topo III therefore produces the observed ladders of ss catenanes. As one would expect, the concentrations of Tus, DNA gyrase, and DNA polymerase I in the replication reaction will influence the extent of replication between the Ter sites. The concentrations of these proteins were adjusted to limit this replication as we worked with the system, thus accounting for the different extent of catenation observed in Figures 2–4 compared to Figures 6 and 7. Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The HRDC Domain of RecQ Is Not Required for LRI Resolution (A) Titration of RecQ in LRI resolution reactions containing 8 nM Topo III and 400 nM SSB. (B) Titration of RecQΔHRDC in LRI resolution reactions containing 8 nM Topo III and 400 nM SSB. (C) Quantification of the experiments shown in (A) and (B). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Neither Topo I nor Topo IV Can Substitute for Topo III in LRI Resolution (A) Titration of Topo III in LRI resolution reactions containing 5 nM RecQ and 400 nM SSB. (B) Quantification of the experiment shown in (A). (C) Comparison of the activities of Topo I, Topo III, and Topo IV in LRI resolution. LRI resolution reactions contained 5 nM RecQ, 400 nM SSB, 8 nM Topo III, and the indicated concentrations of either Topo I or Topo IV. Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Specificity for RecQ in LRI Resolution (A) LRI resolution reactions contained 8 nM Topo III, 400 nM SSB, and the indicated concentrations of RecQ, Rep, or UvrD. The 2.0 kb fragment is described in the text. (B) LRI resolution reactions contained 8 nM Topo III, 400 nM SSB, and the indicated concentrations of RecQ, PriA, RecG, or RuvAB (reconstituted at a ratio of 5:1, RuvA:RuvB). Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Topo III Stimulates RecQ Unwinding of the LRI LRI resolution reactions contained 400 nM SSB, either no topoisomerase or either 8 nM Topo I or 8 nM Topo III, and the indicated concentrations of RecQ. The fraction of the LRI either unwound or resolved is displayed in the table below the figure of the gel. Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 SSB Mediates Cooperation of RecQ and Topo III in LRI Resolution (A) LRI resolution reactions contained 10 nM RecQ, either no or 6 nM Topo III, as indicated, and either no or 400 nM wild-type SSB, SSBΔC8, or SSB113, as indicated. (B) Effect of variant SSBs on unwinding of the LRI by RecQ. Reactions contained LRI, the indicated concentrations of RecQ, and either no or 400 nM wild-type SSB, SSBΔC8, or SSB113, as indicated. The fraction of the LRI either unwound or resolved is displayed in the table below the figure of the gel. (C) Effect of variant SSBs on Topo III decatenation of unwound LRI. LRI was first unwound by RecQ in a separate reaction containing only 400 nM SSB. The reaction was terminated as described in the Experimental Procedures, extracted with phenol-CHCl3, and the unwound LRI recovered by ethanol precipitation. Unwound LRI was then incubated under standard conditions in reactions containing 7 nM Topo III and either no or 400 nM wild-type SSB, SSBΔC8, or SSB113, as indicated. The fraction of the DNA products as LRI, unwound LRI, or resolved LRI is displayed in the table below the figure of the gel. (D) RecQ and Topo III interact with SSB. Coprecipitation assays were performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. Reaction mixtures contained the indicated proteins. P, pellet; S, supernatant. (E) Neither RecQ nor Topo III interacts with SSBΔC8. Coprecipitation assays were performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. Reaction mixtures contained the indicated proteins. P, pellet; S, supernatant. (F) Topo III, but not RecQ, retains interaction with SSB113. Coprecipitation assays were performed as described in the Experimental Procedures. Reaction mixtures contained the indicated proteins. P, pellet; S, supernatant. Molecular Cell 2008 30, 779-789DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.020) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions