* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting Watershed-Based Stormwater Management for Linear Projects through the Green Highways Partnership Patrick Jeffers, U.S. Environmental Protection.
Advertisements

Mid-Atlantic Green Highways Partnership Building Bridges through Collaborative Partnerships Overview & Progress Update.
Stormwater, Wellhead Protection and Drainage Issues Public Hearing.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Final Thoughts. Special Acknowledgments Board of Water & Soil Resources Local Soil & Water Conservation Districts County Environmental Services & Planning.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Environmental Finance Center Boise State University Working on the “How to Pay” Issues of Watershed Restoration The Environmental Finance Center.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
Integration Of Stormwater Master Plans with Watershed Plans The Link between Flooding and Development September 23, 2008 Bob Murdock, P.E., CFM.
1 Sustainable Water Infrastructure State/EPA Innovations Symposium January 24, 2006.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
The Use of Environmental Management Systems in Permitting Decisions National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 May 10, 2006 Christine Steagall SC Department.
Best Practices in Addressing NPDES and Other Water Quality Issues in Highway System Management NCHRP 20-68A, Scan DOMESTIC SCAN PROGRAM Scan Overview.
STATEWIDE TRANSPORATION MULTI-MODAL MEETING David Coyne, Deputy Administrator and Chief Engineer Maryland State Highway Administration November 14, 2014.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant Program (IGIG) ABC’s and 123’s of Illinois EPA’s newest grant program Jan Carpenter Illinois EPA
Presented by: Brenton McCloskey, MD DNR Associate Director for Restoration Financing and Policy Watershed Restoration in Maryland Helping Advance Restoration.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
TMDL Implementation: Now What?
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
GREEN STREETS | GREEN JOBS | GREEN TOWNS INITIATIVE
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Mid-Atlantic Green Highways Partnership
* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *
Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. January 19, 2008
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Mid-Atlantic Green Highways Partnership
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act Section 18
Funded by USDA IFAFS Program, October 2000
Providing businesses with a forum where they can make their voices heard, share best practices, facilitate volunteer opportunities for employees...
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
TMDL Water Quality Restoration Grant, and State Revolving Funds Loans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Research Program Strategic Plan
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Funding from the Local Perspective
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Funding from the Local Perspective
Funding from the Local Perspective
Creating Partnerships: EPA R8, NRCS, and States
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
New Mexico First Town Hall 2017
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
National Center for Mobility Management Webinar May 10, 2018
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Mid-Atlantic Green Highways Partnership
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Uniting Florida’s Environment and Industry
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Bay Area Watershed Network
Presentation transcript:

* Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association * Promoting Watershed-Based Stormwater Management for Linear Projects through the Green Highways Partnership Good afternoon, my name is Pat Jeffers. I am a student intern for EPA Region 3. I’ve spent the last several months researching highway stormwater management for the Green Highways Partnership. Denise has already explained the Green Highways Partnership for you, now I would like to discuss some work being done by the Watershed-Based Stormwater Management Theme Team of this Partnership. Patrick Jeffers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III / NNEMS Student, Case Western Reserve University * Background Image Courtesy of Kansas State Alumni Association *

Conventional Stormwater Management To start off, I’d like to discuss the differences between conventional and watershed-based stormwater management. Conventional stormwater management involves bringing stormwater to a centralized location for treatment by facilities such as the detention ponds shown in these pictures. This type of stormwater management focuses on fulfilling environmental regulations regarding flows and water quality being discharged to receiving streams.

Conventional Stormwater Management Conventional stormwater management does well to address the needs of highways, but does little to address the needs of the watershed of which they are a part. Conventional stormwater management fails to address watershed impairments, expected TMDL requirements, and is usually more costly in the long run. Using a watershed approach, these needs can be addressed.

Watershed-Based Stormwater Management Conventional stormwater management does well to address the needs of highways, but does little to address the needs of the watershed of which they are a part. Conventional stormwater management fails to address watershed impairments, expected TMDL requirements, and is usually more costly in the long run. Using a watershed approach, these needs can be addressed.

Watershed-Based Stormwater Management Watershed-Based stormwater management is a concept that recognizes that highways coexist with other land uses in watersheds, and uses a collaborative approach to provide an opportunity for highway agencies to plan and deliver the most cost-effective protection, even improvement, to watersheds.

Watershed-Based Stormwater Management Regulatory compliance at a minimum Watershed-wide needs considered through watershed improvement plans Stormwater Management Plans focused on good environmental results Stormwater Management Plans integrated into project development and project features Use partnerships to leverage and deliver a combination of watershed improvements to cohesively and consciously produce tangible results Watershed-Based stormwater management uses regulatory compliance as a minimum requirement. It considers the needs of the watershed and focuses on achieving results that address those needs. These results are obtained through strategic partnerships, innovative stormwater BMPs, and a desire to improve the environment. The key here is to consciously produce tangible results. Under this approach, plans are set forth to improve the health of the watershed, and regulatory compliance will follow.

Goal Develop and implement a collaborative, watershed-based approach to stormwater management focused on results. We recognize that highways coexist with other land uses and that cost effective approaches to stormwater management can yield watershed protection, even improvement, if we integrate planning, maintain flexibility, and focus on outcomes. The goal of the Stormwater Theme Team is to develop and implement a collaborative, watershed-based approach to stormwater management focused on results. We recognize that highways coexist with other land uses and that cost effective approaches to stormwater management can yield watershed protection if we integrate planning, maintain flexibility, and focus on outcomes.

Identify attributes of Green Highways relating to a watershed approach to stormwater management through case studies of projects and organizations. A charrette is scheduled to take place in November that will address qualities that define a “Green Highway.” The discussion will focus around the proposal for MD Route 301 to be developed as a “Green Highway.” GETF and the LID Center have received a grant from EPA Region III to document, evaluate, and demonstrate more effective stormwater practices that also support watershed restoration. They will work with MDSHA on their pilot projects to compare the effectiveness of innovative BMPs, demonstrate water quality and market benefits of innovative BMPs, develop values for trading schemes and study their effectiveness relating to watershed-based stormwater management, and compare these results with similar research by other organizations. One objective of the team is to identify how watershed based stormwater management is incorporated into Green Highways through a variety of case studies. In order to further this objective, EPA Region III has awarded a grant to GETF and the LID Center for documenting, evaluating, and demonstrating more effective stormwater practices that also support watershed restoration. They will work with MDSHA to compare effectiveness of innovative BMPs, demonstrate water quality and market benefits of innovative BMPs, develop values for trading schemes and study their effectiveness relating to watershed based stormwater management, and compare these results with similar research by other organizations.

Incorporate 10 Innovative Stormwater Demonstration Projects in Maryland, District of Columbia, and Pennsylvania. EPA Region III has been working with PennDOT and PADEP to pilot stormwater management projects within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Potential locations and projects will be reported soon. MDSHA and EPA Region III are partnering on a $ 100K Cooperative Agreement ($50K – EPA/ $50K MSHA) awarded by EPA Region III to implement pilot projects incorporating and evaluating performance of innovative stormwater management techniques, including Low Impact Development strategies in 3 representative watersheds. The results will be utilized to target and project environmental outcomes for broader application in the Chesapeake Bay watersheds, as well as in other target watersheds in the Mid-Atlantic. FHWA and EPA Region III have offered $1 million in grants for watershed restoration projects in the Anacostia River Watershed. Up to three grants or cooperative assistance agreements will be selected for funding. At least one selected will have to focus on integrating transportation planning with watershed management. The projects will have a performance period of three to five years. The application deadline has passed, and awards should be announced in October. Another team objective is to incorporate 10 innovative stormwater demonstration projects in the Mid-Atlantic region. Thus far, the partnership has been working with PennDOT and PADEP to pilot stormwater management projects within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Also, MDSHA and EPA Region III are partnering on a $100,000 cooperative agreement to implement innovative stormwater BMPs, focusing on LID strategies, in 3 representative watersheds. Also, FHWA and EPA have awarded $1 million in grants for watershed restoration projects in the Anacostia River Watershed.

Address regulatory flexibility and policy support to promote watershed based stormwater management - (NPDES, 404, 401, state regulations TMDLs, etc). A Green Highways Regulatory Roundtable is scheduled to take place in October. This discussion will focus on regulatory flexibility in addressing stormwater management projects. EPA Region III has conducted a review and of innovative stormwater BMPs related to linear transportation projects in order to rank effectiveness as related to highway impacts and watershed benefits. The review was conducted from resources found in NCHRP 25-25 (Environmental Stewardship Practices, Procedures, and Policies for Highway Construction and Maintenance). Results will be applied to stormwater pilots in MD, PA, and DC. Addressing regulatory flexibility in supporting watershed based stormwater management is another objective of the team. In support of this objective, a regulatory roundtable was held last week to discuss opportunities for regulatory flexibility and areas where policies and legislation can promote innovative practices. Also, a comprehensive review of innovative stormwater BMPs relating to linear transportation projects has been conducted and the top BMPs will be promoted in pilot projects to demonstrate their potential to the transportation community.

Identify research need topics & areas. The Stormwater Theme Team has identified a number of research opportunities regarding stormwater management on highway projects. These opportunities were generated from discussions during Green Highways Forums and meetings, as well as from the DOT NCHRP Report 521 (Identification of Research Needs Related to Highway Runoff Management). EPA Region III has partnered with Villanova University and Prince George’s County to conduct a comparison study of porous asphalt and pervious concrete. The study will compare the two stormwater BMPs side by side for effectiveness and durability. Finally, the stormwater team has been active in identifying upcoming research areas. The team has identified a number of research opportunities through Green Highways Forum discussions as well as Department of Transportation reports. One of these research areas is currently being addressed through a partnership with Villanova University, comparing pervious concrete and porous asphalt for use in treating stormwater runoff.

Questions and Comments Thanks for your attention, I will be glad to answer any questions you may have during the panel discussion at the end of this session.