AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration through Mediating Histone H4R3 Dimethylation on KRPs and Pre-mRNA Splicing of RKP in Arabidopsis  Hui Liu, Xu Ma,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Repression of COUP-TFI Improves Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Insulin-Producing Cells  Tao Zhang, Xiao-Hang Li, Dian-Bao.
A Histone H3 Lysine-27 Methyltransferase Complex Represses Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana  Gu Xiaofeng , Xu Tongda , He Yuehui   Molecular.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Nicastrin/miR-30a-3p/RAB31 Axis Regulates Keratinocyte Differentiation by Impairing EGFR Signaling in Familial Acne Inversa  Yanyan He, Haoxiang Xu, Chengrang.
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
5-Methylcytosine RNA Methylation in Arabidopsis Thaliana
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
A Truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, AtNAP1;3T, Alters Plant Growth Responses to Abscisic Acid and Salt in the Atnap1;3-2 Mutant  Liu.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
The RdDM Pathway Is Required for Basal Heat Tolerance in Arabidopsis
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
H3K36 Methylation Is Involved in Promoting Rice Flowering
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Induction of Somatic Embryos in Arabidopsis Requires Local YUCCA Expression Mediated by the Down-Regulation of Ethylene Biosynthesis  Bo Bai, Ying Hua.
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
SKIP Interacts with the Paf1 Complex to Regulate Flowering via the Activation of FLC Transcription in Arabidopsis  Ying Cao, Liguo Wen, Zheng Wang, Ligeng.
RNA Sequencing of Stentor Cell Fragments Reveals Transcriptional Changes during Cellular Regeneration  Henning Onsbring, Mahwash Jamy, Thijs J.G. Ettema 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
Repression of COUP-TFI Improves Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Insulin-Producing Cells  Tao Zhang, Xiao-Hang Li, Dian-Bao.
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Xiang Han, Hao Yu, Rongrong Yuan, Yan Yang, Fengying An, Genji Qin
BZR1 Interacts with HY5 to Mediate Brassinosteroid- and Light-Regulated Cotyledon Opening in Arabidopsis in Darkness  Qian-Feng Li, Jun-Xian He  Molecular.
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
CNOT3-Dependent mRNA Deadenylation Safeguards the Pluripotent State
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
A Novel System for Xylem Cell Differentiation in Arabidopsis thaliana
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 Transcription Factors Act with the NF-YC Complex to Regulate SOC1 Expression and Mediate Drought-Accelerated Flowering  Keumbi.
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e4 (November 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
DNA Damage-Induced Transcription of Transposable Elements and Long Non-coding RNAs in Arabidopsis Is Rare and ATM-Dependent  Zhenxing Wang, Rainer Schwacke,
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration through Mediating Histone H4R3 Dimethylation on KRPs and Pre-mRNA Splicing of RKP in Arabidopsis  Hui Liu, Xu Ma, Hua Nan Han, Yu Jin Hao, Xian Sheng Zhang  Molecular Plant  Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1634-1646 (December 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010 Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration. (A) Shoot regeneration frequencies of calli of wild-type (Col), atprmt5-1, atprmt5-4, 35S:KRP1-2#, and 35S:KRP1-3# after culture on shoot-induction medium (SIM) at indicated times. Calli were cultured on callus-induction medium (CIM) for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. The frequencies were calculated using the number of all calli cultured on SIM divided by the number of calli with shoots. (B) Regenerative shoot number per callus of Col, atprmt5-1, atprmt5-4, 35S:KRP1-2#, and 35S:KRP1-3# after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. Only the calli giving rise to at least one shoot were used to count. (C) Morphology of calli shown in Col, atprmt5-1, atprmt5-4, 35S:KRP1-2#, and 35S:KRP1-3# after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, S20, S24, S28, and S32 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 days, respectively. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Different Expression Genes Analyzed by RNA-Seq Analyses. (A) Cluster analysis of transcript levels of genes in the wild-type (Col) and the atprmt5 mutant. Col-A, Col-B, and Col-C are the three repeats of Col. atprmt5-A, atprmt5-B, and atprmt5-C are the three repeats of the atprmt5 mutant. (B) Analysis of different expression genes by edgeR software. A 2-fold change in the gene expression levels between the wild-type Col and the mutant atprmt5 with an adjusted P value (FDR) cutoff of 0.05 was used for analyses. (C) GO analysis of the upregulated genes in the atprmt5 mutant. (D) GO analysis of the downregulated genes in the atprmt5 mutant. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 AtPRMT5 Regulates KRPs Expression through Histone Modifications. (A) Expression level of KRP1 in the wild-type (Col) and the atprmt5-1 mutant calli after culture on SIM for 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 days. TUBULIN2 (TUB2) was used as an internal control. (B) Histone H4R3sme2 levels in regions (a, b, c, and d) of the KRP1 promoter in Col and atprmt5-1 calli after culture on SIM for 16 days revealed by ChIP analysis. (C) Expression level of KRP2 in the wild-type (Col) and the atprmt5-1 mutant calli after culture on SIM for 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 days. TUB2 was used as an internal control. (D) Histone H4R3sme2 levels in regions (a, b, c, and d) of the KRP2 promoter in Col and atprmt5-1 calli after culture on SIM for 16 days revealed by ChIP analysis. (E) Expression of KRP1 in Col and atprmt5-1 calli cultured on SIM for 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 days as indicated by GUS staining. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. (F) Spatial-temporal expression of KRP1 in Col and atprmt5-1 calli cultured on SIM as indicated by paraffin section of (E). S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, and S20 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 days, respectively. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration through Repression of KRPs Expression. (A) Shoot regeneration frequencies of calli of wild-type (Col), atprmt5-1, krp1-1, krp2-1, krp1-1krp2-1, atprmt5-1krp1-1, atprmt5-1krp2-1, and atprmt5-1krp1-1krp2-1. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. The frequencies were calculated using the number of all calli cultured on SIM divided by the number of calli with shoots. (B) Regenerative shoot number per callus of wild-type (Col), atprmt5-1, krp1-1, krp2-1, krp1-1krp2-1, atprmt5-1krp1-1, atprmt5-1krp2-1, and atprmt5-1krp1-1krp2-1. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. Only the calli giving rise to at least one shoot were used to count. (C) The morphology of the calli shown in Col, atprmt5-1, krp1-1, krp2-1, krp1-1krp2-1, atprmt5-1krp1-1, atprmt5-1krp2-1, and atprmt5-1krp1-1krp2-1 cultured on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, S20, S24, S28, and S32 represent calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 days, respectively. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 AtPRMT5 Regulates Shoot Regeneration through Pre-mRNA Splicing of RKP. (A) Schematic illustration of pre-mRNA splicing of RKP in the wild-type (Col) and atprmt5-1. *The intron with pre-mRNA splicing defects. (B) Pre-mRNA splicing of RKP of Col and atprmt5-1 calli after culture on SIM for 12, 16, and 20 days. TUBULIN2 (TUB2) was used as an internal control. *The amplified fragment including the intron with pre-mRNA splicing defects. S12, S16, and S20 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 12, 16, and 20 days, respectively. (C) The relative indensity of the bands in (B). Normal indicates the right spliced mRNA of RKP, and abnormal indicates the unspliced mRNA of RKP. (D) Expression patterns of RKP are shown by GUS staining in Col calli after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, and S20 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 days, respectively. (E) The vector pRKP:wtRKP with the wild-type RKP gene and the mutated vector pRKP:mRKP with the mutation in the two sides of sixth intron of RKP. (F) Pre-mRNA splicing of wild-type (Col), rkp-2, pRKP:wtRKP-1#, pRKP:wtRKP-5#, pRKP:wtRKP-8# in rkp-2 and pRKP:mRKP-2#, pRKP:mRKP-10#, pRKP:mRKP-12# in rkp-2 calli after culture on SIM for 16 days. TUB2 was used as an internal control. (G) Frequencies of calli of wild-type (Col), rkp-2, pRKP:wtRKP-1#, pRKP:wtRKP-5#, pRKP:wtRKP-8# in rkp-2 and pRKP:mRKP-2#, pRKP:mRKP-10#, pRKP:mRKP-12# in rkp-2 after culture on SIM for 32 days. The frequencies were calculated using the number of all calli cultured on SIM divided by the number of calli with shoots. (H) The regenerative shoot number per callus of wild-type (Col), rkp-2, pRKP:wtRKP-1#, pRKP:wtRKP-5#, pRKP:wtRKP-8# in rkp-2 and pRKP:mRKP-2#, pRKP:mRKP-10#, pRKP:mRKP-12# in rkp-2 after culture on SIM for 32 days. Only the calli giving rise to at least one shoot were used to count. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates, and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). ns indicates no significant difference. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Mutation of RKP Represses Shoot Regeneration. (A) Shoot regeneration frequencies of calli of wild-type (Col), atprmt5-1, rkp-1, and atprmt5-1 rkp-1 after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. The frequencies were calculated using the number of all calli cultured on SIM divided by the number of calli with shoots. (B) Regenerative shoot number per callus of Col, atprmt5-1, rkp-1, and atprmt5-1 rkp-1 after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. Only the calli giving rise to at least one shoot were used to count. (C) Morphology of calli shown in Col, atprmt5-1, rkp-1, and atprmt5-1 rkp-1 cultured on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, S20, S24, S28, and S32 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 days, respectively. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 RKP Regulates Shoot Regeneration through KRP1 Function. (A) Shoot regeneration frequencies of calli of wild-type (Col), rkp-1, 35S:KRP1-3#, and rkp-135S:KRP1-3# after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. The frequencies were calculated using the number of all calli cultured on SIM divided by the number of calli with shoots. (B) Regenerative shoot number per callus of Col, rkp-1, 35S:KRP1-3#, rkp-135S:KRP1-3# after culture on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. Only the calli giving rise to at least one shoot were used to count. (C) Morphology of calli shown in Col, rkp-1, 35S:KRP1-3#, rkp-135S:KRP1-3# cultured on SIM at indicated times. Calli were cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants and then transferred to SIM for shoot induction. S0 represents the calli cultured on CIM for 6 days using roots as explants before transferring to SIM. S4, S8, S12, S16, S20, S24, S28, and S32 represent the calli cultured on SIM for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 days, respectively. Scale bars represent 500 μm. Standard errors were calculated from three sets of biological replicates and more than 100 calli were examined in each replicate. Significant difference (Student's t test, **P < 0.01). ns indicates no significant difference. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Co-regulation of Shoot Regeneration by AtPRMT5-Mediated Histone Modifications and RNA Splicing. Molecular Plant 2016 9, 1634-1646DOI: (10.1016/j.molp.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 The Author Terms and Conditions