Transfer Line Calculations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
Advertisements

1 James N. Bellinger 4-Feb-2009 ME+1 status and Endcap Z James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 4-Feb-2009.
COMP322/S2000/L221 Relationship between part, camera, and robot (cont’d) the inverse perspective transformation which is dependent on the focal length.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Muon Alignment EDR: FEB. 28, Endcap Alignment EMU Alignment DAQ Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002 Outline: 1.Components to.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
Muon Endcap Alignment Analog Sensor Calibrations & Software Update Samir Guragain, Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech October 2005 USCMS EMU meeting – Fermilab,
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line 1 Transfer Line 1 Transfer Plate.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
26/10/20051 BARREL ALIGNMENT: LIST OF PARAMETERS REQUIRED FOR THE POSITIONING AND THE CALIBRATION OF THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS Praxial system: - Platforms -
Partial Disassembly of the alignment devices on each ME11transfer plate, ME1/1 chamber and ME1/2 chamber. (6 on +Z and 6 on –Z side of the CMS)
Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB Target DM distance DMdowel to DCOPS dowel DCOPS dowel to center.
Alignment Software from the ME perspective Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech Muon Alignment meeting during CMS week - CERN, March 15, 2005.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.
NOTICE : This presentation was given at the October 2007 “Lunch N Learn” at Ellison Technologies in Charlotte. The presentation is meant to be viewed with.
Chapter 8 Alternating Current Circuits. AC Circuit An AC circuit consists of a combination of circuit elements and an AC generator or source An AC circuit.
January 19, y X Z Translations Objects are usually defined relative to their own coordinate system. We can translate points in space to new positions.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,
Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13 February 2008 Cocoa Plans.
EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 25-February-2011 Z-sensor News James N. Bellinger 25-February-2011 Good news this time!
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.
1 James N. Bellinger Robert Handler University of Wisconsin-Madison 11-Monday-2009 Laser fan non-linearity James N. Bellinger 20-March-2009.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010.
Construction Surveys. List of Figures Stages and Measurements of CS Design stages: topographic Surveying, and site maps Construction stage: Setting-out.
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Geometric Transformations
Relates mostly to machining centers
Translation Rotation Scaling
EMU Alignment DAQ Endcap Alignment Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002
Three-Dimensional Graphics
Lecture 2 Transformations
GEOGEBRA RESOURCES TRANSLATIONS Reflections 5.1.2: Transformations As.
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
Introduction to Vectors and Frames
Drawing Triangles.
Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment
Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction
Coordinate system for the GIF as defined for CMS RPCs
Chapter IV Spaces and Transforms
Plus Endcap Transfer Lines
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
DCOPS Readout before and during MTCC
DCOPS Monitoring of Iron Bending
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Unit Circle 1 (0,0) Center: Radius: -1.
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Validating Transfer Line Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
Starting from the Basics
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Comparing Laser Fit to Barrel Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Understanding True Position
University of Wisconsin at Madison
6.4 - Trig Ratios in the Coordinate Plane
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

Transfer Line Calculations 9-March-2009 and following

Input 24 DCOPS, with 2 (averaged) values per PG positions of the DCOPS wrt their disk centers Ideal SLM directions Ideal Z positions of DCOPS

Verify DCOPS PG Z on ME+2/3 agree with ideal Z differences

Unknowns 3 disks (x,y) and RZ  9 unknowns 6 lasers (sx,sy)  12 unknowns 24 dV (?)  24 unknowns at 3.8T (0 at 0)

Location Define ideal transformation From Cocoa: CMS = OffSLM + RotSLM*(OffXfer+RotXFer*XFerPos) My local coordinate system: XFerPos = OffJNB+RotJNB*DCPos RotSLM=Rz(θz) Ry(θy) Rx(θx)

Stations ME+1 and ME+2 face the same direction

ME+1 SLM transforms to CMS X Y Z Rx Ry Rz HSLM1 -17.0821 63.7511 6782 -90 15 HSLM2 -63.7511 17.0821 75 HSLM3 46.6690 135 HSLM4 195 HSLM5 255 HSLM6 315

ME+1 TP transforms to SLM X Y Z Rx Ry Rz PT1 7175.83 -48 22.5 -90 PT2 PT3 PT4 PT5 PT6

ME+2 SLM transforms to CMS X Y Z Rx Ry Rz SLM1 -77.64571 289.7777 7998 -90 15 SLM2 75 SLM3 -212.132 135

ME+2 TP transforms to SLM X Y Z Rx Ry Rz TP1/S1 7175.829 -48 -22.5 90 TP4/S1 -7175.833 22.5 -90 TP2/S2 -7175.829 TP5/S2 7175.833 TP3/S3 TP6/S3

ME+3/4 SLM transforms to CMS X Y Z Rx Ry Rz SLM1 -77.64571 289.7777 9642/ 10537 90 15 SLM2 75 SLM3 -212.132 135

ME+3/4 TP transforms to SLM X Y Z Rx Ry Rz TP1/S1 7177.343 -48 22.5 -90 TP4/S1 -7175.803 -22.5 90 TP2/S2 7175.833 TP5/S2 -7175.833 TP3/S3 TP6/S3

Local DCOPS/XFER coordinate X = rφ, phi in x y direction Y = R, radial Z “into page” using right hand rule X=Y=0 = center of DCOPS in ideal system Z=0 = position of Ref DCOPS dowel

Nomenclature (Z always ideal) (δx, δy) = shift in disk from ideal (H,V) = center of DCOPS wrt ideal, PG (ΔH, ΔV) = shift in local DCOPS center (PH,PV) = Profile predictions (0, dV) = cantilevered shift due to bending Indexed by station or disk and by point #

XFer Plate details Ref DCOPS dowel pin is X,Z center of XFer Ref DCOPS dowel is +6.724 shimmed away from Y center of XFer

Transfer Plate Center X Center Y

Transform Center to XFer X (=H) Y Z (=-V) PT1 208.5 73.175 PT2 202.5 PT3 -157.5 PT4 -163.5 PT5 PT6 Rx=-90 Ry=0 Rz=0

Disk and PT: DCOPS to CMS: B=0 C = XC + RC(XT+RT(XD+RD P) C = XA + RA P XA ≡ XC +RCXT+ RCRT XD RA ≡ RCRTRT Above are Ideal positions, XT from PG Shifting (per disk) gives unknown (to be solved for): C’ = XS + RS C RS mostly rotation about Z

Complications w/ B=3.8 The disks bend Bending is not the same at every PT Cannot assume each disk bends the same amount ME+2/ME+3 cantilever by the same angle in different directions Disks have additional rotation about Y (actually about line near the floor)

Laser position/direction Nominal position is same as center of ME+4 XFer DCOPS Each PT has 2 laser slopes

DCOPS data Preprocess to include orientation, average both sides Calibration (scale and offset) not included yet Only 1 laser; only Plus Endcap