A. La Marca, S. M. Nelson, G. Sighinolfi, M. Manno, E. Baraldi, L

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage E. van den Boogaard, M. Goddijn, N.J. Leschot, F. van der Veen, J.A.M. Kremer,

Advertisements

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li

Kay Neumann, Georg Griesinger Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Attitudes and policies regarding access to fertility care and assisted reproductive technologies in Israel Daniel Sperling, Yael Simon Reproductive.

Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Khanh Linh, Ho Manh Tuong, P. C

Diet and endometriosis risk: A literature review

Blastocyst-stage versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in women with high oestradiol concentrations: randomized controlled trial Eman A. Elgindy, Ahmed.

Fresh and cryopreserved ovary transplantation and resting follicle recruitment Sherman Silber, Jorge Pineda, Kathleen Lenahan, Michael DeRosa, Jeffrey.

FMR1 gene CGG repeat variation within the normal range is not predictive of ovarian response in IVF cycles Scott J. Morin, Ashley W. Tiegs, Jason M.

S.M. Nelson, A. La Marca Reproductive BioMedicine Online

External validation of nomogram for the decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women: a population study of 15,834 infertility patients Scott M.

Mid-luteal progesterone concentrations are associated with live birth rates during ovulation induction J.-C. Arce, A. Balen, P. Platteau, G. Pettersson,

E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Ovarian response markers lead to appropriate and effective use of corifollitropin alpha in assisted reproduction Antonio La Marca, Giovanni D’Ippolito

E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Willem Ombelet Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian response in GnRH-antagonist- treated oocyte donors Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Dominic Stoop, Christophe.

A. La Marca, G. Sighinolfi, S. Giulini, M. Traglia, C. Argento, C

L. L. van Loendersloot, M. van Wely, S. Repping, F. van der Veen, P. M

The effect of peri-implantation administration of uterine relaxing agents in assisted reproduction treatment cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Follicular-fluid anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations are predictive of assisted reproduction outcome in PCOS patients Recai Pabuccu, Cemil Kaya, Gamze.

Fresh transfer outcome predicts the success of a subsequent frozen transfer utilizing blastocysts of the same cohort L.F. Doherty, J.R. Martin, U. Kayisli,

Gillian M. Lockwood Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of pregnancy following IVF

Anti-Müllerian hormone as an independent predictor of twin versus singleton pregnancy in fresh cycles Reshef Tal, David B. Seifer, Moisey Khanimov, Eliana.

Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?

K. Gersak, A. Veble Reproductive BioMedicine Online

What’s on the mind of IVF consumers?

S Munné, E Fragouli, P Colls, MG Katz-Jaffe, WB Schoolcraft, D Wells

Sarah McCredie, William Ledger, Christos A. Venetis

Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine after ovarian drilling in clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS women: a pilot study A. Nasr Reproductive BioMedicine Online

L. Simon, I. Proutski, M. Stevenson, D. Jennings, J. McManus, D

Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions? Jayeon Kim, Allison M. Deal, Ursula Balthazar,

Prognostic factors influencing fresh and frozen IVF outcomes: an analysis of the UK national database W. Mark Hirst, Andy Vail, Daniel R. Brison, Stephen.

Endometrial injury to overcome recurrent embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Neelam Potdar, Tarek Gelbaya, Luciano G.

Effect of energy expenditure and physical activity on the outcomes of assisted reproduction treatment Mert Kucuk, Fadime Doymaz, Bulent Urman Reproductive.

Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence

Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature

Lisa Cummins, Juliette Koch, Suha Kilani

Mostafa Metwally, Cynthia M. Farquhar, Tin Chiu Li

The relationship between sperm head retardance using polarized light microscopy and clinical outcomes Belinda G. Vermey, Michael G. Chapman, Simon Cooke,

Dehydroepiandrostendione sulphate and prediction of live birth after IVF in young women with low anti-Müllerian hormone concentration Miro Šimun Alebić,

Impact of vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors Alberta Maria Fabris, Maria Cruz, Carlos Iglesias,

V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss

Intra-cycle variation of the uterine cavity indentation assessed with three-dimensional ultrasound in natural and stimulated cycles Sotirios H. Saravelos,

The value of HCG serum concentrations after trigger in predicting pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF–ICSI Jianjun Zhou, Shanshan Wang, Bin Wang, Junxia.

LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles Kevin Doody, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Han Witjes, Bernadette Mannaerts

Stanley Paul Leibo (1937–2014): scientist, mentor and friend

Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management – meta-analyses Daniele Santi, Giorgia.

Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?

Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Predicting pregnancy rate following multiple embryo transfers using algorithms developed through static image analysis Yun Tian, Wei Wang, Yabo Yin,

GnRH antagonist pre-treatment: one centre's experience for IVF–ICSI cycle scheduling Veronique Viardot-Foucault, Sadhana Nadarajah, Weng Kit Lye, Heng.

Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah

The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Response: time-lapse systems for ART

Duration of blastulation may be associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles Sezcan Mumusoglu, Irem Y. Ozbek,

Predictive value of ovarian reserve markers in smoking and non-smoking women undergoing IVF Thomas Freour, Lionel Dessolle, Miguel Jean, Damien Masson,

Predictive value of serum HCG concentrations in pregnancies achieved after single fresh or vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer Galia Oron, Tal Shavit,

Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?

Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH Basil C. Tarlatzis,

The significance of the number of CGG repeats and autoantibodies in premature ovarian failure Cem Fıçıcıoglu, Gazi Yildirim, Rukset Attar, Banu Kumbak,

Live birth following early follicular phase oocyte collection and vitrified-warmed embryo transfer 8 days later Safak Hatırnaz, Ebru Hatırnaz, Baris.

Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysis Kirstine Kirkegaard, Alison Campbell, Inge Agerholm, Ursula.

Claudio Manna, Loris Nanni, Alessandra Lumini, Sebastiana Pappalardo

China’s model of egg donation is a policy lesson for Britain

Yakoub Khalaf, Susan Bewley, Peter Braude

Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation

M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein

Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era? Antonio La Marca, Martina Capuzzo Reproductive.

Presentation transcript:

Anti-Müllerian hormone-based prediction model for a live birth in assisted reproduction A. La Marca, S.M. Nelson, G. Sighinolfi, M. Manno, E. Baraldi, L. Roli, S. Xella, T. Marsella, D. Tagliasacchi, R. D’Amico, A. Volpe Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 341-349 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.005 Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Receiver operating characteristic curve for the live birth prediction model. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed by determining the area under the curve and was 0.66 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.72). At the best cut-off, the model permitted the identification of live birth with a sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 44.2% and the patients correctly classified were 53.5%. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2011 22, 341-349DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.005) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions