Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A non-endoscopic device to sample the oesophageal microbiota: a case-control study  Daffolyn R Fels Elliott, MD, Alan W Walker, PhD, Maria O'Donovan, MD,
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Systematic Characterization and Analysis of the Taxonomic Drivers of Functional Shifts in the Human Microbiome  Ohad Manor, Elhanan Borenstein  Cell Host.
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthmatic patients is associated with an altered airway microbiome  Asger Sverrild, MD, PhD, Pia Kiilerich, MSc, PhD,
Strength in Diversity Cell Host & Microbe
Volume 160, Issue 3, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Community Behavior and Spatial Regulation within a Bacterial Microcolony in Deep Tissue Sites Serves to Protect against Host Attack  Kimberly M. Davis,
Taxonomic composition of subway microbial communities.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Changes in archaeal diversity during great ape diversification.
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Prevotella as a Hub for Vaginal Microbiota under the Influence of Host Genetics and Their Association with Obesity  Jiyeon Si, Hyun Ju You, Junsun Yu,
Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Longitudinal Evaluation of the Skin Microbiome and Association with Microenvironment and Treatment in Canine Atopic Dermatitis  Charles W. Bradley, Daniel.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Martin Depner, PhD, Markus J. Ege, MD, Michael J
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Alterations in the Gut Microbiota Associated with HIV-1 Infection
Inference of Environmental Factor-Microbe and Microbe-Microbe Associations from Metagenomic Data Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Model  Yuqing.
Genetic Determinants of the Gut Microbiome in UK Twins
Microbiota and Host Nutrition across Plant and Animal Kingdoms
Conducting a Microbiome Study
SIV-Induced Instability of the Chimpanzee Gut Microbiome
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Lower airway microbiota and mycobiota in children with severe asthma
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Early-life gut microbiome composition and milk allergy resolution
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (March 2015)
Jay-Hyun Jo, Clay Deming, Elizabeth A. Kennedy, Sean Conlan, Eric C
Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Collateral damage from oral ciprofloxacin versus nitrofurantoin in outpatients with urinary tract infections: a culture-free analysis of gut microbiota 
C. Kampmann, J. Dicksved, L. Engstrand, H. Rautelin 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Medial Axis Shape Coding in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
The Human Microbiome Project in 2011 and Beyond
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation in AS patients receiving different therapeutic regimens. Altered mycobiota and bacterial-fungal correlation.
Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages (September 2015)
The Diversity of Gut Microbiome is Associated With Favorable Responses to Anti– Programmed Death 1 Immunotherapy in Chinese Patients With NSCLC  Yueping.
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
V. Lazarevic, S. Manzano, N. Gaïa, M. Girard, K. Whiteson, J. Hibbs, P
Fig. 1 The seven nasal CSTs and their respective bacterial densities shown in boxplots and composition shown in heatmap visualization and non-metric multidimensional.
Fig. 1. Dysbiosis of the skin microbiome in AD is associated with S
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome bacterial communities in relation to presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Variations in beta and alpha diversity of gut microbiome eukaryotic communities explained by presence of Blastocystis. Variations in beta and alpha diversity.
Comparison of distal gut microbiota composition between Egyptian and U
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Similarity of non-neoplastic and neoplastic colonic disease associated bacterial profiles. Similarity of non-neoplastic and neoplastic colonic disease.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 631-640 (December 2013) Nasal Microenvironments and Interspecific Interactions Influence Nasal Microbiota Complexity and S. aureus Carriage  Miling Yan, Sünje J. Pamp, Julia Fukuyama, Peter H. Hwang, Do-Yeon Cho, Susan Holmes, David A. Relman  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 631-640 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Taxonomic Composition of Nasal Communities at Three Sites in Persistent and Nonpersistent S. aureus Carriers The average relative abundances of the 14 most abundant bacterial genera, as well as S. aureus, are displayed. “Staphylococcus, other” refers to all staphylococci other than S. aureus. The six S. aureus persistent carriers are on the left, and the six nonpersistent carriers are on the right. The locations of the three sampling sites (the AN, MM, and SR) in the human nasal cavity are indicated in the schematic on the lower right. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Alpha-Diversity Measurements for Communities from the Anterior Naris, Middle Meatus, and Sphenoethmoidal Recess Several alpha diversity metrics were employed (richness, phylogenetic diversity, Shannon index, and equitability). The bottom and top of each box are the first and third quartiles, respectively, and the band inside the box is the median. The whiskers represent one SD above and below the mean of the data. Statistical testing was based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Principal Coordinate Analysis of Samples on the Basis of Tissue Type Two different phylogenetically-based beta diversity metrics, Rao dissimilarity and weighted UniFrac, were employed. On the left, DPCoA, which is based on Rao dissimilarity, was performed on the top 50 most abundant OTUs. Ellipses centered on the categorical averages revealed an almost complete overlap of the mucosal tissue (MM and SR) samples. On the right, DPCoA and UniFrac PCoA were based on all OTUs. See also Table S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DPCoA and Weighted UniFrac PCoA of Samples Based on the Carriage Status of the Individual (A–C) DPCoA (A) and UniFrac-based PCoA (B) were performed with all sequence data (A), and DPCoA was performed after removal of all S. aureus sequences from analysis (C). (D) DPCoA in which samples are colored according to the relative abundance of S. aureus sequences in that sample. Host carriage status was determined on the basis of conventional clinical culturing of AN swabs as described in the Experimental Procedures. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Predicted S. aureus Carriage Status of Human Microbiome Project Anterior Naris Samples (A) PCoA plots based on Bray Curtis distances. Carriage status is associated with the first principal coordinate (PC1 = 12.5%). (B) PCoA of weighted UniFrac distance. The predicted carriage status of the NIH HMP samples appears to separate samples on PC2 (28.2%). Predictions were based on a random forests classifier built from genus-level abundances with data from this study with a 10-fold cross-validation. The resulting classifier had an estimated error of 6.885% ± 6.9% in comparison to 49.0% from baseline error (random guessing). Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Relative Abundances of the Top Two Predictors for S. aureus Carriage Status on the Basis of a Sparse Linear Discriminant Model Trained on 90% of the Data and Tested on the Remaining 10% OTU 93808 corresponds with C. pseudodiphtheriticum and OTU 62369 corresponds with C. accolens. Species-level identifications were based on the SILVA-108-database-curated species taxonomic assignments. See also Table S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Interactions of C. accolens and C. pseudodiphtheriticum with S. aureus on Agar Plates (A) Cells of one bacterial species were added to brain-heart infusion agar containing 0.5% Tween 80, and cells of another species were spotted at the center of the Petri dish on top of the agar surface. Growth inhibition or growth promotion of the bacterial species in the agar around the colony at the center of the dish is apparent. (B) Growth inhibition and promotion were quantified by measuring the distance (cm) between the edge of the colony and the periphery of the inhibition or growth promotion zone. For example, a S. aureus (S.a.) colony enhanced the growth of C. accolens (C.a.) in the surrounding agar (upper left photo in A and top bar in B), whereas a C. pseudodiphtheriticum (C.p.) colony inhibited the growth of S. aureus in the surrounding agar (lower right photo in A and bottom bar in B). Averaged results from at least six experiments per interacting strain pair are shown. Data are represented as mean ± 1 SD. Cell Host & Microbe 2013 14, 631-640DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions