Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures: Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling up Barbara J. Smith, U. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Policy.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems A National Look at Statewide Data Systems from the Perspective of IDEA Early Childhood Programs Donna.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference September 15-17, 2013 Washington, DC Suzanne Raber, DaSy,
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference September 15-17, 2013 Washington, DC Why CEDS for Part C.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: Current Status and Future Priorities Donna Spiker DaSy Center.
Working Across Systems to Improve Outcomes for Young Children Sheryl Dicker, J.D. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Family and Social Medicine, Albert.
Early Success A framework to ensure that ALL children and families in the District of Columbia are thriving... CHILDREN & FAMILIES Community Supports Education.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Head Start National Research Conference Washington, DC July 9, 2014 Collaboration through Information.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Collaboration through Information Sharing: Building Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems (ECIDS) Head.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Needs Assessments to Identify and Evaluate Technical Assistance: Results of a National Survey about.
Minnesota’s Outcome Measurement System For Infants, Toddlers and Preschool Children with Disabilities and their Families, including young children with.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Does Your Data System Answer Your Critical Questions? Abby Winer, DaSy Center at SRI International Grace.
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development.
1 Early Intervention Graduates Go to Kindergarten: Findings from the National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS) Kathleen Hebbeler Donna Spiker.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood: The Case of Early Intervention and Early.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Sharing is Good for Kids Kathy Hebbeler NERCC Part C Coordinators Meeting April 24, 2013.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems CEDS: Common Data Elements and Definitions for Part C and 619 Programs Meredith Miceli, OSEP Missy Cochenour,
THE CENTER FOR IDEA EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS FPG Seminar Series November 18, 2013 Presented by: Kellen Reid Martha Diefendorf Introducing the DaSy.
Jim O’Brien Head Start Bureau Health and Disabilities Services Branch 330 C Street, SW Washington, DC Phone: (202)
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
K-12 And Early Childhood Data Connections NCES Forum February 2011 Presented by: Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.
1 Identifiers from Early Learning to P-20W Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Carol Jenner (WA) Jay Pennington (IA)
House Education Committee February 4, Let’s take a look…
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Stockholm Sweden, June 2016 Missy Coffey Cochenour, M.A. Kathleen Hebbeler, Ph.D Abby Schachner, Ph.D.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems The Importance of Personnel Data Donna Spiker Co-Director, DaSy Center OSEP 2016 Virtual leadership Conference.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
PreK – 3rd Grade System Design Strategies for Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Your World’s Best Workforce Plan Bobbie “Leading for educational excellence.
PRESENTATION TITLE Subhead presenter date
Status of Part B 619 State Data Systems
Incorporating Early Childhood into Longitudinal Data Systems:
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Aug , 2016
Cross-Discipline Team Practices in Early Intervention and Schools: An Exploratory Study in Connecticut Chelsea Pansé, M.A., Special Education and Hannah.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference August, 2016
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Making Connections: Vermont’s Early Intervention Partnerships
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
Questions, Data, and Reports: Connecting the Data Dots Using the DaSy Framework System Design and Development Subcomponent Taletha Derrington and Kathleen.
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Christina Kasprzak, ECTA/ECO/DaSy September 16, 2013
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
Using Data to Answer Critical Questions about EI/ECSE Personnel
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood:
Communicating to the Public about Child Outcomes Data
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010
Proposals for Head Start and Child Care & Development Block Grant: How They May Impact Children with Disabilities Adele Robinson, NAEYC February 8, 2005.
Tracking and Data Management
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Preschool LRE: Current State Challenges and Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014 A National Look at Statewide Data Systems from the Perspective of IDEA Early Childhood Programs Donna Spiker and Lynne Kahn The DaSy Center Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014

What methods were used? Online needs assessment developed by DaSy workgroup Coordinated with ITCA and ECDC surveys Sent to Part C (EI) and 619 (ECSE) coordinators Completed with data managers and others identified by coordinators ITCA is the Part C (early intervention) Infant Toddlers Coordinators Association Part C is early intervention (EI) and 619 is early childhood special education (ECSE)

What kinds of questions were asked? Status of Part C and 619 data systems: Data systems and data elements Linkages between different state data systems Data system administration and use of data Note: Slightly different versions for Part C and 619 based on program differences

Who were the respondents? Sent to all states and jurisdictions Report of the information collected focuses on information reported by 50 states, DC, and Puerto Rico We had an excellent response rate: For Part C 94% (n = 49) For 619 96% (n = 50) We focused the report on the 50 states, DC and Puerto Rico since they are included in IDEA data tables for how child count is reported. But we do have information for other jurisdictions. Need to address why territories not included in the report…Be clear on what response rate based on 52 (the report numbers) way child count data is reported…..

Results: Most Part C and 619 data systems have child-level and workforce data, fewer have local program-level data Part C 619 Child-level 94% 96% Program-level 29% 40% Workforce: EI providers 65% ---- Workforce: special education teachers 83% Workforce: related service providers 71% Workforce: general education teachers The percents are the percent of states responding (and For child-level – there are no “Nos”, only missing There is a lot more detail and information in the report.

Most Part C and 619 data systems have a variety of data elements in their child-level data systems. Some common data elements Part C 619 Child demographics 94% 96% Disability category 77% Eligibility status 98% 90% Child outcomes 83% Service setting 89% 87% ID for program or school 81% Reason for exiting program 79%

States vary in the kinds of workforce data they have in state data systems. Workforce data element Part C 619 special ed teachers 619 Therapists 619 regular ed teachers Demographics 29% 67% 58% 64% Employment data 54% 77% 60% Education 46% 75% Licenses/certifications 56% 83% 69% 71% Professional development 39% 23% Wages 10% 42% These are what we asked about: a. Demographics (one or more of the following: race/ethnicity, age, language, gender, etc.) b. Employment information (one or more of the following: employing agency/school, position title, years of experience, start date, etc.) c. Education (one or more of the following: degree, field of study, etc.) d. Licenses/certifications e. Professional development completed (in-service or other training) f. Wages

Linkages: Why is this important? States can answer programmatic and policy questions about: Children’s outcomes from EI and ECSE participation, e.g.,: Do former EI recipients require special education in kindergarten? How are ECSE graduates doing in third grade? Factors associated with good child outcomes, e.g.,: What workforce and program factors, such as personnel qualifications and program quality, have a substantial impact on child outcomes? Do children served in inclusive programs have better outcomes?

Only about one-third of states have linked data across Part C and 619. Remember that there are 12 states with Education as the lead agency for Part C, so we would expect C and 619 data to be in same system or connected. We combined data from the two surveys, and about one-fourth disagreed about the connections.

There is infrequent use of common identifiers across Part C and 619. Common identifier for C & 619 Child-level 21% Program-level or school-level 12% Workforce-level 6%

Linkages with K12 education data are more common for 619 than for Part C. Types of education data in same system or have been linked Part C 619 K12 special education 41% 87% K12 general education 14% 79% Not surprising that more states can link for 619

For Part C, few states have linkages with other EC data, and for 619,almost half have linkages with state preK. Types of other EC data Part C 619 State pre-K 12% 46% Head Start 6% 22% Early Head Start 2% 10% Child care 8% Home visiting

Linkages with health data are more common for Part C than for 619. Types of health data Part C 619 Medicaid/SCHIP 42% 12% EHDI 37% 8% Vital records 21% 0% Birth defects registry 2% All-payer claims (insurance) 13% WIC/SNAP 6% Hospital Behavioral health 4% Connections between c and health are strong in many states; health is lead agency in many states (N = ) Highest with Medicaid (42%); and newborn hearing screening (EDHI- Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program)

Only few states have linked Part C or 619 data to social services data. Types of social services data Part C 619 Child welfare 21% 10% Foster care 12% 8% Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) 14% Homeless services 6%