Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meadowbank Gold Project Cumberland Resources Ltd. Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Chesterfield Inlet, Nunavut March 30, 2006.
Advertisements

Baffinland Mary River Project Environmental Assessment Methods Marine Environment VECs Workshop Session 02 November 2011.
Environment Canada Presentation to Nunavut Impact Review Board Regarding Baffinland Mary River Project NIRB Prehearing Conference Pond Inlet and Igloolik,
Environment Canada’s Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) Regarding AREVA Resources Canada Inc.’s Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project NIRB.
PROPONENT INVOLVEMENT IN CONSULTATION Presentation to the Geology Matters Community Engagement Workshop October 30, 2012 Consultation with the Mi’kmaq.
Geology Matters 2013 Presenter: Robert Federico, Principal November 14, 2013 Donkin Coal Mine Environmental Assessment Case Study.
Mary River Project Pre-Hearing Conference Presentation Igloolik, and Pond Inlet, Nunavut November 6-7 and 9-10, 2011.
Mary River Project Early Revenue Phase NPC Oral Hearings January 2014.
Baffinland Iron Mines Mary River Project November Pre-Hearing Conference Igloolik & Pond Inlet.
NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD Targeting Increased Effectiveness in a Changing Landscape Nunavut Mining Symposium, Iqaluit, April 17, 2012.
Baffinland Iron Mines Mary River Project November 2011 Community Round-Table Igloolik and Pond Inlet.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Investing in the logistics necessary for Africa's Oil and Gas Industry.
Nunavut Water Board (NWB) Community Presentation Type “A” Water Licence Process for Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation’s (BIMC) Mary River Project Community.
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Overview of NLCA (b) Igloolik & Pond Inlet November 2011.
Synopsis EIA Purpose of EIA Origin Key Elements NGO Participation Content Analysis 1.
Assessing Effects on Human Health Meadowbank Gold Project Margaux Brisco Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearings, Baker Lake, Nunavut March 27 to 31,
Nunavut Impact Review Board Presentation of Technical Submission AREVA Resources Canada Inc. Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project March 2015 Transport Canada.
Mary River Project Pre-Hearing Conference Presentation Igloolik, and Pond Inlet, Nunavut November 6-7 and 9-10, 2011.
MARY RIVER PROJECT BIOPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS MONITORING FRAMEWORK.
Izok Corridor Project: Kitikmeot Community Visit
2006 Socio-economic component CUMBERLAND RESOURCES LTD.  Baseline  Impact Assessment  Mitigation and Benefit Enhancement  Monitoring  Intervener Comments.
Qikiqtani Inuit Association Nunavut Water Board Technical Meeting and Pre-Hearing Conference January 16 th and 17 th, 2013.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Propeller Club for Port of New Orleans 24 September 2015.
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY. How has (NLCA) been met? a) whether the project would enhance and protect the existing and future well-being of the residents.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Mineral Development Advisory Group. To represent the interests of Kitikmeot Inuit by protecting and promoting our social, cultural, political, environmental.
Andrew Burwood, Sean Cullen, Gillian Davidson, Pierre Pelletier Rescan Environmental Services IAIA Conference, Seoul, 6 June 2007 IFC Performance Standards.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Doris North Gold Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Public Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 12-14,
Back River Mine Project Presentation to the Nunavut Impact Review Board Final Hearing Cambridge Bay, NU April 25-30,
Interagency Coordination in Long Range Transportation Planning
Figure 1 General Project Location
“The people’s forests” Public Participation in National Forest Planning Susan Jane Brown, Staff Attorney Western Environmental Law Center The National.
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
MADRID – BOSTON PROPOSAL PHASE 2 OF THE HOPE BAY PROJECT
Kitikmeot Inuit Association
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Phase 2 Hope Bay Belt Project
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
MAIN FINDINGS OF NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Manny Marta, P.Eng. Project Lead
Lac la croix first nation
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Southern Sierra IRWMP Update
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 400KV ±250 KM POWER LINE FROM BORUTHO S/S IN MOKOPANE TO BOKMAKIERIE S/S IN NZHELELE & ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Cumulative Effects
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Atmospheric Environment
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Freshwater Environment
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Human Environment
10th Air Quality Governance Lekgotla Session: 7.3
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Marine Environment
Phase 2 – Technical Meetings
16MN056 - Public Hearing August 26 to 29, 2019 Baker Lake, Nunavut
CR-GR-HSE-412 Stakeholder and Local Impact Assessment
Stakeholder and Local Impact Assessment GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-412)
Presentation transcript:

Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Technical Meetings April 8-10, 2019 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Introduction, Overview, and Response to Technical Comments

Introduction of the Team

Baffinland Iron Mines Team Megan Lord-Hoyle Abe Aronian Jason Prno Lou Kamermans Ramli Halim Phil Rouget Joe Tigullaraq Denys Del Cardo Patrick Abgrall Fay Pittman Luc Bourdon Tannis Thomas Connor Devereaux Christian Richard Melanie Austin Krista Johnson Christine Kowbel Mike LePage Marsha Chetty Mike Cooper Sara Wallace Sean Hinchberger Richard Cook Christine Moore Glen Johnstone Mike Setterington Andrew Moore Aurora Van Buren

History of the Mary River Project

History of Baffinland 1962 Mary River’s high grade iron ore first noted in an airborne reconnaissance 1986 Original land claim by Baffinland 2012 Government approval of Baffinland's development plans The Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB) issues the Project Certificate 2013 Baffinland proposed changes to the schedule and specific activities in the initial stages of the Project September 2013 Baffinland and QIA sign the IIBA 2015 First iron ore is shipped to Europe 2018 EIS submitted for Phase 2

Mary River Project Mary River is an operating open pit iron ore mine owned and operated by Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation 160 km south of Pond Inlet and 1,000 km north of Iqaluit Nine high-grade iron ore deposits, only Deposit No. 1 is being mined now Three currently active main project locations under the Early Revenue Phase Mine Site, 100 km long Tote Road, and Milne Port. South Railway and Steensby Port south of the Mine Site are approved and

Phase 2 Proposal Overview

Changes for Phase 2 Mine Site Transportation Milne Port Shipping 1 2 3 4 Shipping

Overview of Phase 2 Proposal 1. Mine Site 3. Milne Port 4. Shipping Crushing relocated and reduced to primary only Construction of rail line and loading terminal Increased fuel storage Construction of additional ore dock Increased ore stockpiling Increased power generation Expanded development area Construction of rail line and unloading terminal Crushing of Iron Ore Move secondary ore crushing from Mine Site to Milne Port Indoor crushing of iron ore Less dust in the environment Stable temperatures for equipment and employees Supporting Infrastructure Additional accommodations Rail maintenance facility Landfill Shipping during the open water season is possible by adding a second, larger ore dock Shipping route will remain the same: route through Eclipse Sound Increase in number of vessels 2. Transportation Construction of rail line from Mary River to Milne Port Raised railway bed and track Tote road will continue to transport people and equipment Safety and wildlife protection measures will not change Community access to transport along the road will not change Overview of Phase 2 Proposal

Purpose and Need Increase operational efficiencies to mine and ship more iron ore each year Increased production is the key to long-term viability of the Mine Increase economic viability and environmental sustainability with North Railway

Baffinland’s Approach to IQ

Baffinland’s Approach to IQ Engagement with local communities began in 2004 supported by Community Liaison Officers frequent and varied discussions “Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit” or the acronym “IQ” is broadly intended to mean Inuit Societal Values (ISV) that include: traditional, current, and evolving bodies of Inuit values, beliefs, experience, perceptions, and knowledge regarding the environment, including, land, water, wildlife, and people, to the extent that people are part of the environment. DO NOT TRANSLATE NOTES The engagement and consultation process which was initiated in 2004, has deepened our understanding of what IQ is and how this evolving body of knowledge can enhance Project discussions and processes. -Over the years we have relied on QIA’s feedback and will continue to request QIA’s involvement in identifying methods for collecting, evaluating and integrating IQ - We acknowledge different definitions of IQ exist, including those defined by NIRB. ]

Sources of IQ Utilized by Baffinland IQ has been collected under research licenses issued by the Nunavut Research Institute Outside of the formal IQ collection process, discussions with Elders and IQ holders that have taken place as part of the community engagement program DO NOT TRANSLATE NOTES - The formal IQ collection process included the Land Use Report, individual and group interviews, community workshops - Through community engagement, residents shared their knowledge and observations and that information helped to develop a more comprehensive assessment of the Project

Influence of IQ on the Project Phase 2 Proposal shipping period was selected to avoid time periods of critical Inuit land use and harvesting activities. Community-based knowledge gained through IQ resulted the selection of blueberries and lichen as key indicator species Spatial boundaries for the assessment fish and fish habitat and the wildlife and wildlife habitat were informed by distribution of a species valued by Inuit Wildlife species, harvesting locations, and land/marine components of importance to Inuit, informed Baffinland’s approach to mitigating Project effects in these areas. DO NOT TRANSLATE NOTES -We value our relationships with the North Baffin communities and strive to consider and incorporate community-based knowledge gained through IQ in all aspects of our project including; Project design, selection of VEC’s, baseline studies, in the effect’s assessment, mitigation and monitoring A few examples of this are [speak to the slide bullet points] NOTE: Blueberries recently dropped as an indicator species – see QIA 09 response.

Looking Ahead Additional IQ Collection A series of community risk and mitigation workshops with participants from all five North Baffin communities are being planned Final workshop is planned to take place at the Mary River Mine Site the week of May 6th 2019 Adaptive Management and Monitoring Programs Existing adaptive management processes and monitoring programs have been developed with direct consideration of IQ Applicable monitoring plans will be revised to include a “Use of Community Input and IQ in the Monitoring Program” section DO NOT TRANSLATE NOTES The objectives of these workshops are to examine Baffinland’s existing and proposed terrestrial and marine mammal monitoring programs and identify improvements to account for the additional terrestrial (rail) and marine (increased frequency) transportation components of Phase 2. We have requested participation and feedback on the design, topics for discussion during the workshops to ensure that they would be culturally appropriate and an effective tool for retrieving and supporting the incorporation of relevant IQ   Baffinland provides funding for a full-time QIA employee to be on site as an Environmental Monitor for the Project. We have also committed to continue training and hiring Inuit to work on the monitoring programs Building off of the existing adaptive management processes, we are going to reconsider the framework for adaptive management and address specifically how IQ will be used in this process.

Phase 2 Proposal Document Map

Document Map Binder 1 Binder 2 Binder 2.1 Binder 2.2 Binder 3 Binder 4 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal TSD 01 Alternative Analysis TSD 02 Appendix D Water License Application Part 1 TSD 02 Appendix D Water License Application Part 2 TSD 03 Phase 2 Workshop Report TSD 09 Vegetation Baseline and Impact Assessment TSD 13 Surface Water Assessment TSD 18 Ballast Water Dispersion Model TSD 25 Socio-Economic Assessment TSD 28 Management Plans (Part 1) TSD 28 Management Plans (Part 2) TSD 28 Management Plans (Part 3) TSD 28 Management Plans (Part 4) TSD 02 Project Description TSD 04 Phase 2 Public Consultation Report TSD 10 Terrestrial Wildlife Baseline and Impact Assessment TSD 14 Freshwater Biota and Habitat Assessment TSD 19 Fuel Spill Modelling Report TSD 26 Labour Market Analysis TSD 05 Mary River Inuit Knowledge Study Mapbook TSD 11 Evaluation of Exposure Potential from Ore Dusting Events in Selected VECs TSD 15 Freshwater Habitat and Offsetting Plan TSD 20 Hydrodynamic Modelling Report - Milne Port TSD 27 Cumulative and Transboundary Effects TSD 06 Climate Change Assessment TSD 12 Migratory Birds Baseline and Impact Assessment TSD 16 Ice Conditions Report TSD 21 Invasive Species Risk Assessment TSD 07 Atmospheric Assessment TSD 17 Marine Environmental Effects Assessment TSD 22 Ship Wake and Propeller Wash Assessment TSD 08 Landforms, Soils, and Permafrost Assessment TSD 23 Marine Fish Habitat Offsetting Plan TSD 24 Marine Mammal Effects Assessment

Management and Monitoring Plans – Commitment Register

Management and Monitoring Plans TSD 28 Identifies management and monitoring plans applicable to the Phase 2 Proposal Presents known changes that will be required as a result of Phase 2 activities New plans for the North Railway and a formalized socio-economic monitoring plan were created Additional new plans – Inuit Human Resources Strategy Procedure and the Inuit Procurement and Contracting Strategy – are presented for the first time Commitment Register to track updates and changes to plans

List of Presentations

Presentation Introduction & Overview of the Project Alternatives Assessment Methodologies & Accidents and Malfunctions Atmospheric Environment Marine Environment Freshwater Environment Terrestrial Environment Human Environment Cumulative and Transboundary Effects Assessment Presentation

Information Request Comments