Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Biology of Amyloid: Structure, Function, and Regulation
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Zachary Lee Johnson, Jue Chen  Cell 
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Peter A. Meyer, Ping Ye, Mincheng Zhang, Man-Hee Suh, Jianhua Fu 
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Matthew L. Baker, Tao Ju, Wah Chiu  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Structure of the Oligosaccharyl Transferase Complex at 12 Å Resolution
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
The 3D Structure of Villin as an Unusual F-Actin Crosslinker
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Anna Hagmann, Moritz Hunkeler, Edward Stuttfeld, Timm Maier  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e2 (September 2017)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Hoersch, Tanja Kortemme  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Katharina Hipp, Clemens Grimm, Holger Jeske, Bettina Böttcher 
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 1994)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Structure of the Kinesin13-Microtubule Ring Complex
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Calibrated Measurement of Gating-Charge Arginine Displacement in the KvAP Voltage- Dependent K+ Channel  Vanessa Ruta, Jiayun Chen, Roderick MacKinnon 
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 441-448 (March 2008) De Novo Backbone Trace of GroEL from Single Particle Electron Cryomicroscopy  Steven J. Ludtke, Matthew L. Baker, Dong-Hua Chen, Jiu-Li Song, David T. Chuang, Wah Chiu  Structure  Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 441-448 (March 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of GroEL (A) Representative field of view of an electron micrograph is shown. (B) The 4.2 Å resolution reconstruction of GroEL with D7 symmetry is shown with a single subunit in red. (C) The 4.7 Å resolution reconstruction of GroEL with C7 symmetry is shown. A single subunit of GroEL in the A ring is colored in blue, while in the B ring it is colored in yellow. Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Model of a GroEL Monomer (A) SSEHunter results are shown superimposed on the GroEL monomer density. Helices are shown as green cylinders while sheets appear as blue rectangles. (B) The skeleton generated from SSEHunter is shown in red superimposed on the density. (C) The final monomer built from the 4.2 Å resolution D7 GroEL density map is shown. The model is colored from the N to C termini (blue to red). Helices are labeled and correspond to their placement within the sequence as shown in Figure S1. (D) Characteristic density features in the GroEL map and model are shown. In helical regions, the pitch of the helix is visible (top left panel). Furthermore, separation of strands in β sheets (top right) begins to become visible in the equatorial domain of the GroEL monomer. Several protruding densities corresponding to bulky amino acids (bottom panels) can be seen in the map. Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Model Validation The D7 GroEL model (colored as in Figure 2C) is shown superimposed on a GroEL monomer from 1OEL (gray) (A). Per-residue differences between the monomer and the model are plotted in (B). The yellow bars show nearest Cα distances, while the red bars show position-specific differences. The green dashed line is shown at ∼4.2 Å, the resolution of the density map. In (C) and (D), a continuous color scheme was employed to show the Cα–Cα distances such that distances close to zero are blue, distances of ∼4.2 Å are white, and distances 8 Å or greater are red. In (D), a position-specific distance is shown, while in (D) a nearest-neighbor distance is shown. Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 GroEL C7 Monomer Model Differences (A) A comparison of the two C7 monomers is shown. The A ring model is shown in blue; the B ring model is shown in yellow. (B) A view of the density around the nucleotide binding pocket is shown for a monomer in both the A and B rings (left and right column, respectively). The nucleotide-bound states of GroEL (1SX3 and 1SX4) were fit to the C7 model; only the nucleotides are shown. (C) A zoomed-in view of the equatorial domain helices is shown. The approximate view angle is illustrated by a red arrow in panel (A). (D) A view of the C7 model superposition is shown highlighting the intermediate domain. The approximate view angle is indicated by the black arrow in (A). Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 GroEL Inter-Ring Contacts (A) The C7 density map and corresponding models are shown. (B) A zoomed in view of the map and models about the inter-ring interface is shown. The approximate position in the full C7 model is indicated by the rectangle in panel (A). The C7 model is colored from the N to C termini; blue to red, respectively. Additionally, several negatively charged residues are colored in red while positively charged residues are shown in blue (annotated as spheres). (C) A zoomed in view of the asymmetric R452-E461 salt bridge is shown. The connecting density and potential salt bridge is illustrated with a green dashed line. The approximate positions in the full C7 reconstruction are indicated by an asterisk in panel (A). (D) A dashed circle, corresponding to the # mark in (A), indicates the bridging density adjacent to K105 in the A ring, but the distance is far too large to form a salt bridge to E434. Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Resolution Curve The Fourier shell correlation for the C7 and D7 GroEL reconstructions are shown. Each was computed by two sets of independent reconstructions from one-half of the image data of the full reconstruction. Structure 2008 16, 441-448DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2008.02.007) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions