Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
Advertisements

Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Philsang Hwang, Shih-Wei Chou, Zongwei Chen, Brian M. McDermott 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (September 2015)
A Feedback Mechanism Controlling SCRAMBLED Receptor Accumulation and Cell- Type Pattern in Arabidopsis  Su-Hwan Kwak, John Schiefelbein  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Leaf Positioning of Arabidopsis in Response to Blue Light
Wenyan Du, Kentaro Tamura, Giovanni Stefano, Federica Brandizzi 
Synaptotagmin SYTA Forms ER-Plasma Membrane Junctions that Are Recruited to Plasmodesmata for Plant Virus Movement  Amit Levy, Judy Y. Zheng, Sondra G.
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Kim Min Jung , Ciani Silvano , Schachtman Daniel P.   Molecular Plant 
Potassium Transporter KUP7 Is Involved in K+ Acquisition and Translocation in Arabidopsis Root under K+-Limited Conditions  Min Han, Wei Wu, Wei-Hua Wu,
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Identification of Nuclear Dicing Bodies Containing Proteins for MicroRNA Biogenesis in Living Arabidopsis Plants  Yuda Fang, David L. Spector  Current.
Dan Zhang, Aleksandar Vjestica, Snezhana Oliferenko  Current Biology 
Budding Yeast Has a Minimal Endomembrane System
Leaf Positioning of Arabidopsis in Response to Blue Light
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
The WUSCHEL Related Homeobox Protein WOX7 Regulates the Sugar Response of Lateral Root Development in Arabidopsis thaliana  Danyu Kong, Yueling Hao, Hongchang.
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (November 2008)
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Polarity Determinants Tea1p, Tea4p, and Pom1p Inhibit Division-Septum Assembly at Cell Ends in Fission Yeast  Yinyi Huang, Ting Gang Chew, Wanzhong Ge,
Regulation of Golgi Cisternal Progression by Ypt/Rab GTPases
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 23, Pages (December 2007)
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Turnip Yellow Mosaic Virus P69 Interacts with and Suppresses GLK Transcription Factors to Cause Pale-Green Symptoms in Arabidopsis  Fangrui Ni, Liang.
Héctor Herranz, Ruifen Weng, Stephen M. Cohen  Current Biology 
An Arabidopsis Lipid Flippase Is Required for Timely Recruitment of Defenses to the Host–Pathogen Interface at the Plant Cell Surface  William Underwood,
Leticia Lemus, Juan Luis Ribas, Natalia Sikorska, Veit Goder 
A Conserved Interaction between SKIP and SMP1/2 Aids in Recruiting the Second-Step Splicing Factors to the Spliceosome in Arabidopsis  Lei Liu, Fangming.
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Agrobacterium Delivers Anchorage Protein VirE3 for Companion VirE2 to Aggregate at Host Entry Sites for T-DNA Protection  Xiaoyang Li, Haitao Tu, Shen.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2018)
SlMYB21 Encodes an Active Transcription Factor That Interacts With SlJAZ9 and Complements the Arabidopsis Mutant myb21-5. SlMYB21 Encodes an Active Transcription.
Hermann Broder Schmidt, Rajat Rohatgi  Cell Reports 
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Tm-22 Confers Different Resistance Responses against Tobacco mosaic virus Dependent on Its Expression Level  Haili Zhang, Jinping Zhao, Shanshan Liu,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 2413-2422 (June 2017) A Tonoplast P3B-ATPase Mediates Fusion of Two Types of Vacuoles in Petal Cells  Marianna Faraco, Yanbang Li, Shuangjiang Li, Cornelis Spelt, Gian Pietro Di Sansebastiano, Lara Reale, Francesco Ferranti, Walter Verweij, Ronald Koes, Francesca M. Quattrocchio  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 2413-2422 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 2413-2422DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sorting of Vacuolar Proteins in Leaves and Petals of Petunias (A) Confocal images of epidermal cells from agroinfected leaves and petals expressing fluorescent fusions of vacuolar (PH5, PhSYP51, and PhSYP22; see also Figure S1) and plasma membrane (AtSYP122) proteins 24 and 48 hr after agroinfiltration. Epifluorescence of chloroplasts and anthocyanins is shown in blue and RFP and GFP fluorescence in red and green, respectively. (B) Confocal image of the petal epidermis of a 35S:PH5-GFP plant. Where the top of the conical cells is imaged, vacuolinos are visible, marked by GFP fluorescence (white arrowheads). Anthocyanins are shown in red. (C) Confocal micrographs of petal protoplasts expressing PH5-GFP, a combination of PH1-GFPi, and the plasma membrane markers RFP-SYP122 or RFP-PhSYP51 24 and 48 hr after transformation. Cells from the petal epidermis contain a CV with anthocyanins (blue); cells derived from the mesophyll have no anthocyanins (see also Figures S2A and S2B). (D) Merged light and confocal micrographs of freshly prepared petunia petal protoplasts. Epidermal cells contain a CV filled with anthocyanins (blue) and small (5–10 μm) vacuolar compartments (vacuolinos) lacking anthocyanin (arrowheads). Mesophyll cells have no vacuolinos (see also Figure S4A). (E) Confocal (bottom) and light micrographs (top) of protoplasts from rose petals 24 hr after transformation with a PH5-GFP construct (see also Figure S4A). (F) Vacuolar proteins co-localize in vacuolinos of epidermal petal protoplasts and epidermal cells from agroinfected petals. The insets are enlargements of the area indicated by the arrowheads. (G) Confocal microphotographs of petal protoplasts expressing PH5-GFP and petunia αTIP-RFP 24 or 48 hr after transformation. (H) Confocal microphotographs of petal protoplasts expressing PH5-GFP and Arabidopsis αTIP-RFP (see also Figures S2D and S3). (A–H) GFP fluorescence is shown in green, RFP in red, and anthocyanin and chloroplast in blue. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2413-2422DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Vacuolinos Are Absent in ph3 and ph4 Mutants (A) Confocal images of epidermal cells from isogenic wild-type, ph3, ph4, and ph5 petals 24 and 48 hr after agroinfiltration (GFP-PhSYP51). Wild-type and ph5 cells show vacuolinos whereas the other mutants do not (see also Figure S3A). (B and C) Light (B) and electron micrographs (C) of isogenic wild-type and mutant petals. In wild-type and ph5 epidermal cells, small vacuolar structures fill the tip of the conical cells (red asterisks). V, vacuolinos (arrowheads); CV, central vacuole; CW, cell wall. (D) Forced expression of PH1 and PH5 in transgenic ph3 does not rescues the formation of vacuolinos. Top: confocal images of epidermal cells 24 hr after agroinfection with a GFP-PhSYP51 construct. Bottom: light micrographs. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2413-2422DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mutation of PH1 and Expression of PhSYP51 or PhSYP22 Block Trafficking from Vacuolinos to the CV (A) Confocal images of epidermal petal cells from a wild-type and a ph1V23 plant 48 hr after agroinfiltration with GFP-PhSYP51 or PH5-GFP (see also Figures S3B–S3D). (B) Protoplasts originating from the petal epidermis (top) and mesophyll (bottom) of a ph1V23 and complemented transgenic clone expressing 35S:PH1 48 hr after transformation with a PH5-GFP construct. The insets show enlargements of the regions indicated by the arrows (see also Figure S3E). (C and D) Light (C) and electron (D) micrographs showing epidermal cells from ph1V23 petals. V, vacuolinos (arrowheads); CV, vacuole. The tips of the conical cells are marked with red asterisks. (E) Confocal micrographs of wild-type epidermal petal cells 48 hr after agroinfection with PH5-GFP, RFP-ATSYP122, and PhSYP51 or PhSYP22. Scale bars are 5 and 1 μm in (D) and 20 μm in all other panels. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2413-2422DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation in Petunia Epidermal Petal Protoplasts Showing Interactions between PH1, PH5, and Vacuolar SNAREs (A) YFP fluorescence (green) alone (left) or merged with fluorescence of RFP-AtSYP122 (red) and anthocyanins (blue) (right). (B) number of analyzed transformed cells displaying YFP fluorescence (filled bars) or not (white bars) (see also Figure S5). (C) cYFP-PhSYP51 and cYFP-PhSYP22 do not interact with nYFP-PhSYP51 (negative control). Scale bars, 10 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 2413-2422DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.076) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions