Comparison and optimization of DNA recovery from sperm vs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The most efficient STR loci in forensic genetics in population of central Poland R. Jacewicz, M. Jedrzejczyk, J. Berent Forensic Science International:
Advertisements

A comparison of AmpFlSTR Identifiler™ Kit versus AmpFlSTR Identifiler Plus™ Kit in challenging bone samples by using normal and increased PCR cycle number 
Exploring the relative DNA contribution of first and second object’s users on mock touch DNA mixtures  F. Oldoni, V. Castella, D. Hall  Forensic Science.
A. Verzeletti, V. Cortellini, S. Cisana, S. Pretto, N. Cerri, F
V. Kallupurackal, T. Kausel, A. Sulzer, P. Voegeli, A. Kratzer 
Activity level in the hierarchy of propositions in case of the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson analyzed using Bayesian network 
PhyloTree Build 17: Growing the human mitochondrial DNA tree
A. Barbaro, P. Cormaci, G. Falcone 
Use of universal reporter primers in multiplex PCR of autosomal loci
Forensic identification of 12 mammals species based on size variation of mitochondrial cytochrome b gene using multiplex PCR assay  M. Črček, K. Drobnič 
Probabilistic modelling for DNA mixture analysis
Efficiency of DNA IQ System® in recovering semen DNA from cotton swabs
C. Davies, J. Thomson, F. Kennedy 
The effect of increased cycle numbers using the Quantifiler® Duo DNA Quantification Kit (AB) on the detection of minute amounts of male DNA in mixtures.
The effects of different adhesive tapes and of Hemastix test strips on DNA recovery using magnetic silica beads  Stefan Kutranov, Holly Cullis  Forensic.
LMD-assisted single cell DNA typing of forensic biological evidence: Issues of the cell type and sample condition  Sergey Leonov, Elena Zemskova, Pavel.
DNA typing of trace DNA recovered from different areas of sandals found at a homicide crime scene investigation: A comparative study  Samuel T.G. Ferreira,
Juliana G. Aquino, Juliana Jannuzzi, Elizeu F. Carvalho, Leonor Gusmão 
A comparative study between muscle, cartilage and swab from inside the urinary bladder samples for DNA typing of severely burnt bodies in disaster victim.
Establishment of Italian national DNA database and the central laboratory: Some aspects  R. Biondo, F. De Stefano  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Timothy J. Verdon, R. John Mitchell, Roland A.H. van Oorschot 
Effectiveness of CIFS DNA database in Thailand
A new approach for the separation of spermatozoa from other cell types in forensically relevant samples  F. Grosjean, V. Castella  Forensic Science International:
Yan Liu, Li Li, Chengtao Li, Zhenmin Zhao 
U. Ricci, I. Carboni, S. Iozzi, A. Gozzini, F. Torricelli 
Plant dna barcoding system for forensic application
Statistical evaluation of pre-laboratory and laboratory factors that influence DNA recovery from archaeological material  Cristina Gamba, Eva Fernández,
G-H. Olsen, M. Aune, K. Janssen, T. Berg 
A custom software solution for forensic mtDNA analysis of MiSeq data
R. Alghafri, S. Alhammadi, K. Amiri 
Population data for SE33 locus in United Arab Emirates Arab population
S. Iyavoo, A. Wolejko, D. Furmanczyk, R. Graham, R. Myers, T. Haizel 
Automated extraction of DNA from clothing
Combining DNA evidence for greater match information
A. Verzeletti, V. Cortellini, S. Cisana, S. Pretto, N. Cerri, F
Efficient DNA extraction from hair shafts
Evaluating DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for dropin, dropout and stutters  Roberto Puch-Solis  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement.
Joanne L. Simons, Amelia Gamblin, Laura Arnold, Sue C. Vintiner 
DIP–STR: A new marker for resolving unbalanced DNA mixtures
New RNA methods for the identification of body fluids and cell types
Analysis of forensic samples in Banco Nacional de Datos Genéticos
Introducing a latent variable approach for finding populations in a forensic DNA database  Maarten Kruijver  Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Determination of siblings: A special case report from Halle
C.J. Bruijning-van Dongen, K. Slooten, W. Burgers, W. Wiegerinck 
Direct STR typing from bullet casings
M. Hara, T. Masuda, A. Takada, T. Miyazaki, H. Suzuki, A. Kido, K
Semen detection: A retrospective overview from 2010
Application of less primer method to commercial kits
Ancestry proportions in urban populations of Argentina
Eye colour and SNPs in Danes
S. Iyavoo, S. Hadi, W. Goodwin 
Kpop: A Python package for population genetics analysis
Zhilong Li, Peng Bai, Duo Peng, Bing Long, Lin Zhang, Weibo Liang 
Simulated approach to estimate the number and combination of known/unknown contributors in mixed DNA samples using 15 short tandem repeat loci  Sho Manabe,
DNA recovery from a 44-year old umbilical cord
Antoinette A. Westen, Titia Sijen 
Georgina E. Meakin, Emma V. Butcher, Roland A. H. van Oorschot, Ruth M
Monique Wesselink, Irene Kuiper 
Effects of the most common methods for the enhancement of latent fingerprints on DNA extraction from forensic samples  S. Gino, M. Omedei  Forensic Science.
Improved performance for forensic casework: Extraction and isolation updates for the Maxwell® 16 instrument  M. Lindner, P.V. Mandrekar, J. Bessetti,
Development of a 24-plex Y chromosomal STR loci typing system
Statistical aspects of familial searching
L. Zha, L.B. Yun, H.B. Luo, J. Yan, Y.P. Hou 
Andreas O. Tillmar, Helena Nilsson, Gunilla Holmlund 
Steffen L. Lauritzen, Anjali Mazumder 
DNA/RNA co-analysis of seminal fluid-stained fabrics after water immersion for up to seven days  G. Kulstein, P. Wiegand  Forensic Science International:
First application of the Investigator DIPplex indels typing kit for the analysis of ancient DNA samples  C. Hollard, F. Mendisco, C. Keyser, E. Crubézy,
Discrepancies between forensic DNA databases
Effects of storage method on DNA degradation in old bloodstain samples
A.M. Ölçen, G. Filoğlu, H. Altunçul, S. Erdem, Ö. Bülbül 
Presentation transcript:

Comparison and optimization of DNA recovery from sperm vs Comparison and optimization of DNA recovery from sperm vs. epithelial cells using laser capture microdissection technology and an immunofluorescent staining system  G. Axler-DiPerte, S. Orans, A. Singh, T. Caragine, M. Prinz, Z.M. Budimlja  Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series  Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages e224-e225 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.112 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 DNA percent yield from LCM captures of (from left to right) 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 cells of each type. The average DNA yield is shown, with 100% representing the expected theoretical yield per cell number captured. Single source captures of sperm and epithelial cells are the product of 5 replicates, with the error bars showing the upper and lower yields. Captures from mixed source slides are the product of one capture. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2011 3, e224-e225DOI: (10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.112) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions