Immune Response in Stat2 Knockout Mice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Figure 1. Generation of hepatocyte-specific A20 knockout mice. Targeting scheme. Diagram showing the LoxP-flanked (Floxed) and the deleted.
Advertisements

Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Differentiation of CD4+ T Cells to Th1 Cells Requires MAP Kinase JNK2
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (January 1999)
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Inhibition of Th1 Differentiation by IL-6 Is Mediated by SOCS1
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Regulates Pancreatic IL-22 Production and Protects Mice From Acute Pancreatitis  Jing Xue, David T.C. Nguyen, Aida Habtezion 
Important scaffold function of the Janus kinase 2 uncovered by a novel mouse model harboring a Jak2 activation-loop mutation by Eric Keil, David Finkenstädt,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 1996)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Maternal-Derived Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen Alters Macrophage Function in Offspring to Drive Viral Persistence after Vertical Transmission  Yongjun Tian,
Lack of gp130 expression in hepatocytes promotes liver injury1
Critical Role of Complement and Viral Evasion of Complement in Acute, Persistent, and Latent γ-Herpesvirus Infection  Sharookh B. Kapadia, Beth Levine,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Unresponsiveness of MyD88-Deficient Mice to Endotoxin
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 1996)
Mark H Kaplan, Ulrike Schindler, Stephen T Smiley, Michael J Grusby 
Innate immune system plays a critical role in determining the progression and severity of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity  Zhang-Xu Liu, Sugantha Govindarajan,
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Jürgen Ruland, Gordon S Duncan, Andrew Wakeham, Tak W Mak  Immunity 
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Defective NK Cell Activity and Th1 Response in IL-18–Deficient Mice
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
T Cell-Produced Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Controls T Cell Tolerance and Regulates Th1- and Th17-Cell Differentiation  Ming O. Li, Yisong Y. Wan, Richard.
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Both E12 and E47 Allow Commitment to the B Cell Lineage
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
SOCS3 Expressed in M2 Macrophages Attenuates Contact Hypersensitivity by Suppressing MMP-12 Production  Kazuyuki Meguro, Daiki Nakagomi, Kotaro Suzuki,
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Cell Type-Specific Involvement of RIG-I in Antiviral Response
Mohammad Azam, Carolyn Lee, Inga Strehlow, Christian Schindler 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Multiple Developmental Stage–Specific Enhancers Regulate CD8 Expression in Developing Thymocytes and in Thymus-Independent T Cells  Wilfried Ellmeier,
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Joan E Durbin, Renée Hackenmiller, M.Celeste Simon, David E Levy  Cell 
Rapid and Selective Remodeling of a Positioned Nucleosome during the Induction of IL- 12 p40 Transcription  Amy S Weinmann, Scott E Plevy, Stephen T Smale 
LAT Links the Pre-BCR to Calcium Signaling
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
CD83 Expression Influences CD4+ T Cell Development in the Thymus
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages (July 1998)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 21, Pages (October 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Immune Response in Stat2 Knockout Mice Christopher Park, Suzanne Li, Edward Cha, Christian Schindler  Immunity  Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 795-804 (December 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7

Figure 1 Generation of Stat2 Null Mice (A) Schematic representation of the Stat2 targeting construct and ∼14 kb of the endogenous murine Stat2 gene. The positions of exons one through eight are indicated along with informative endonuclease restriction sites (H, HindIII; B, BamHI; S, SalI; X, XbaI; and P, PstI). Double-sided arrows indicate the position of diagnostic restriction fragments used in genotyping with probes P and SB. Asterisks indicate the location of primers employed for PCR genotyping. (B) Representative Southern blot of BamHI restricted DNA prepared from wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− tail DNA and then hybridized with SB. The relative position of the wild-type (WT) and Stat2 null (KO) allele is indicated in the right margin. (C) Representative Stat2 and Stat1 immunoblot of whole-cell extracts prepared from wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− PMEFs. The relative positions of murine Stat1 (MuStat1) and murine Stat2 (MuStat2) are indicated in the left margin. Immunity 2000 13, 795-804DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7)

Figure 2 IFN-Dependent Activation of STAT Transcription Factors in Stat2 Null PMEFs (A) IFN-dependent activation of ISGF-3. Whole-cell extracts were prepared from wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− PMEFs, both before and after stimulation with IFN-α (1000 U/ml; 20 min) or IFN-γ (66 U/ml; 20 min). The extracts were then evaluated by EMSA with an OAS ISRE probe. In lanes 11 and 12, wild-type (+/+) extracts were supershifted by the addition of either preimmune serum (PIS) or a Stat2-specific antibody (αSt2), 30 min prior to incubation with probe. The mobility of ISGF-3 is indicated in the left margin. (B) IFN-dependent activation of Stat1 homodimers. Whole-cell extracts from (A) were evaluated by EMSA with an IRF-1 GAS probe. In lanes 11 and 12, wild-type (+/+) extracts were supershifted by the addition of either preimmune serum (PIS) or a Stat1-specific antibody (αSt1), 30 min prior to incubation with probe. The mobility of Stat1 homodimers is indicated in the left margin. Immunity 2000 13, 795-804DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7)

Figure 3 Evaluation of IFN-Dependent Gene Expression by Northern Blotting (A) Twenty micrograms of total RNA was prepared from wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− PMEFs, both before and after stimulation with IFN-α (1000 U/ml; 6 hr) or IFN-γ (66 U/ml; 2 hr). The blot was then fractionated and sequentially hybridized with probes for MxA, OAS, Stat1, PKR, and GAPDH. (B) Twenty micrograms of total RNA was prepared from wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− PMEFs, both before and after stimulation with IFN-α (1000 U/ml; 2 hr) or IFN-γ (66 U/ml; 2 hr). The blot was then fractionated and sequentially hybridized with probes for IGTP, IRF-1, and GAPDH. Immunity 2000 13, 795-804DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7)

Figure 4 IFN-Dependent Expression of Cell Surface Proteins in Stat2 Null Leukocytes (A) Wild-type (+/+)Stat2+/−, and Stat2−/− PMEFs, splenocytes, or resident peritoneal macrophages were evaluated either before or after stimulation with IFN-α (1000 U/ml; 72 hr) or IFN-γ (66 U/ml; 72 hr) by flow cytometry. Fibroblasts (PMEFs) were then stained with antibodies specific for MHC class I (H-2Kb). Macrophages were stained for Mac-1, MHC I (H-2Kb), and an isotype-matched control (Iso). Splenocytes were stained for Ly-6C and CD3. Histograms represent the expression of MHC I and Ly-6C on the appropriately gated cells. These results are each representative of three independent experiments. (B) (Left) Stat1−/−/Stat2−/− resident peritoneal macrophages were stained for Mac-1, MHC I (H-2Kb), and an Iso, before and after IFN stimulation, as outlined in (A). (Middle) Whole-cell extracts, prepared from Stat2+/+ and Stat2−/− macrophages (Macs) and PMEFs, were adjusted for protein concentration and sequentially immunoblotted with Stat1 (α-MuStat1), Stat2 (α-MuStat2), and β-actin-specific (α-β-actin) antibodies. (Right) RT-PCR analysis of RNA prepared from unstimulated, IFN-α-stimulated, or IFN-γ-stimulated peritoneal macrophages harvested from wild-type (Stat2+/+)Stat2−/−Stat1−/−, and Stat1/Stat2 double knockout (St1/St2 dko) mice. Immunity 2000 13, 795-804DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7)

Figure 5 T Cell Proliferation after a Dexamethasone Challenge Wild-type and Stat2−/− mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1.0 mg dexamethasone or PBS vehicle. Two, four, and five days later, thymic cells were harvested, stained for CD4 and CD8, and evaluated by flow cytometry. The number of cells present in each quadrant are indicated as a percent of total cells plotted. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. Thirty-six hours after intravenous infection with 4 pfu of VSV, spleens and livers were harvested. Viral burden (pfu/g) was determined by measuring the viral titer of organ homogenates on HeLa cells. Organs from four mice were included in each group. Immunity 2000 13, 795-804DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00077-7)