Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Cocrystal Structure of a tRNA Ψ55 Pseudouridine Synthase
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Structural Mechanism of Substrate RNA Recruitment in H/ACA RNA-Guided Pseudouridine Synthase  Jingqi Duan, Ling Li, Jing Lu, Wei Wang, Keqiong Ye  Molecular Cell  Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 427-439 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of Substrate-Bound H/ACA RNP Structures (A) Secondary structure of H/ACA RNA1 with substrate RNA bound at the pseudouridylation pocket. The lower (P1) and upper (P2) stems, substrate-guide helices PS1 and PS2, and the lower (J1) and upper (J2) three-way junctions are indicated. Base pair symbols are depicted according to a previous rule (Leontis and Westhof, 2001). Hollow letters represent disordered residues in the Gar-minus structure. Prime denotes substrate RNA. (B) Ribbon representation of the substrate-bound Gar1-minus H/ACA RNP structure, showing Cbf5 PUA domain in light green; Cbf5 catalytic (Cat) domain in dark green; Nop10 in magenta; L7Ae in blue; substrate RNA in purple; guide sequences in orange; the ACA motif, kink-turn motif, and target nucleotide in red; and the remainder of the H/ACA RNA in yellow. The target nucleotide is shown as sticks. (C) SIGMAA-weighted 2Fo − Fc electron density map of the Gar1-minus complex. The 2.1 Å map is contoured at 1 σ. The refined structure is shown as sticks with carbon atoms colored in pink, oxygen in red, nitrogen in blue, phosphorus in orange, and magnesium in green. (D) The substrate-bound full-complex structure represented as Cα or P traces. The solvent-modified 5 Å electron density map contoured at 1 σ is indicated. Gar1 is colored cyan, and other parts are color coded as in Figure 1B. A symmetry-related molecule, colored in gray, forms a self-duplex with the 5′ extension of H/ACA RNA2. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure and RNP Assembly of Substrate-Bound H/ACA RNA (A) Structure of substrate-bound H/ACA RNA. Hydrated Mg ions are shown as sticks with Mg colored green and water red. (B) RNA-binding surface in substrate-bound H/ACA RNP. Shown are the Gar1-minus RNP structure with Gar1 modeled according to its position in the full complex. RNAs are represented as ribbons and planes, and proteins are represented as surfaces. Individual parts are color coded as in Figure 1B. The RNA-binding surface (within 4 Å of RNA) is colored in gray. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Protein-RNA Interaction in Detail (A) Interaction between the substrate-guide helix PS2 and the Cbf5 D1 subdomain. For clarity, residues 1′–5′ of the substrate are shown with only base planes, and the thumb is not displayed. Oxygen and nitrogen atoms involved in hydrogen bonding are shown in red and blue, respectively. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds. (B) Interaction of the thumb in the closed state. (C) Sequence conservation of the thumb in archaeal Cbf5 (55 sequences) and bacterial TruB (854 sequences), created by WebLogo (Crooks et al., 2004). Corresponding residues in Cbf5 and TruB are aligned based on structural superposition. The bar indicates insertion 2 in TruB. The height of the whole letter stack indicates the sequence conservation at that position, and the height of each letter is proportional to the relative frequency of the amino acid that the letter represents. Hydrophobic residues (L, V, I, W, M, F, P) are green, basic residues (R, K) are red, acidic residues (D, E) are blue, and all other residues are black. (D) Schematic view of interactions at the substrate-bound ψ pocket. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Substrate-Induced Conformation Changes in H/ACA RNP (A) The closed and open conformation of the thumb. Cbf5 in the substrate-bound and free H/ACA RNP structures are colored green and gray, respectively. Residues involved in protein-protein interactions are shown as balls and sticks. (B) Structural alignment of substrate-bound and free H/ACA RNPs. The free structure is colored gray and excludes Gar1 for clarity. The arrow indicates the direction of the movement of the PUA domain and the P1 stem. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mutagenesis Analysis of the Thumb and Gar1 (A) Pseudouridylation activity of H/ACA RNP variants. Shown are representative autoradiographs of TLC plates for a 10 min reaction in 0.01 μM substrate (row 1) and a 1 hr reaction in 10 μM substrate (row 2). The percentages of converted Ψ are indicated. The assembled RNP variants were analyzed with an ethidium-bromide-stained native gel (row 3) and a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel (row 4), showing equal amounts of RNPs and proteins in use. CNGL and CNL stand for the full and Gar1-minus RNP, respectively. (B) Time course of H/ACA RNP-mediated pseudouridylation. Activities were measured with 1 μM enzyme and 0.01, 1, 5, or 20 μM substrate in 1 M NaCl and 50 mM phosphate (pH 7.0) at 37°C. Some RNP variants with normal or zero activities were not characterized at all four substrate concentrations. For wild-type RNP in 20 μM substrate, the best fit to a single exponential function is shown, whereas all other data are connected by lines. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Product of f5U and the Active Site (A) Chemical structure of f5U and f5oh6Ψ. (B) The 2.1 Å 2Fo − Fc electron density map at the active site, contoured at 1.5 σ. The map was calculated from a model in which the f5oh6Ψ7′ base was omitted. (C) Interaction with product f5oh6Ψ at the active site. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of Substrate-Bound H/ACA RNP and the TruB-TSL Complex (A) Structural alignment of substrate-bound H/ACA RNP and TruB-TSL complex. Proteins are shown as Cα traces, and RNAs are shown as ribbons. The H/ACA RNP structure is colored as in Figure 1B, and the TruB-TSL structure is colored in gray. The TruB-specific insertions 1 and 2 are indicated. The boundaries of TruB insertion 2 are marked by gray circles, and the corresponding residues in Cbf5 are marked by green circles. (B) Correspondence between substrate-bound H/ACA RNA and tRNA. The regions commonly recognized by Cbf5/TruB are shaded in yellow. A canonical tRNA structure is shown in L representation. Nucleotides are shown as red circles or as letters when specifically recognized. The substrate of H/ACA RNA is colored purple. (C) Different capping interactions at the end of the tRNA T stem and the H/ACA substrate-guide helix PS2. Molecular Cell 2009 34, 427-439DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.005) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions