APIP Goals Portability of item content Accessibility of item content

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: improving usage statistics Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER December 2006.
Advertisements

Standards in the Education Sector Content Standards Performance Standards Data Standards Interoperability Standards.
Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Student Information and Assessment Data.
Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Universal Design Arkansas Department of Education January 2014.
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.
Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Policies and Guidelines Chief Instructional Officers Update March 12, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
GEORGIA MILESTONES ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Why the change, What to expect, How to prepare.
Find The Better Way Expand Your Voice with VXML May 10 th, 2005.
1 Data Strategy Overview Keith Wilson Session 15.
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Warren County Middle School Business And Information Technology Program “ A Different Approach”
BRINC Personalized Learning Project DLC/TechMACC Combined Meeting March 14, 2014.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
 Introduction Introduction  Purpose of Database SystemsPurpose of Database Systems  Levels of Abstraction Levels of Abstraction  Instances and Schemas.
CEDS Standard Update.
Open Source Innovations for Better Assessment Brandt Redd CTO NCSA 22 June 2015.
March 19, Open Knowledge Initiative: The Saga Unfolds Mike Barker Lois Brooks Jeff Merriman.
Assessment Update Testing Students with Disabilities District Test Coordinator Meeting Douglas Alexander Anne Mruz Suzanne Swaffield June 11,
Architecture for a Database System
26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS] Conference February 14, 2013 Washington, DC Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) Supporting Assessment.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Target Audience  This Presentation is intended for teachers who are teaching at grade levels responsible for Standards of Learning testing.
CHAPTER TEN AUTHORING.
Chapter 1 : Introduction §Purpose of Database Systems §View of Data §Data Models §Data Definition Language §Data Manipulation Language §Transaction Management.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
HOW DO I USE THINKGATE? Presented By: Mercy Aycart From: South Miami Senior High Data have no meaning…meaning is imposed.
©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan1.1Database System Concepts Chapter 1: Introduction Purpose of Database Systems View of Data Data Models Data Definition.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved.
Monitoring Student Performance with Access, Excel, and Tinkerplots Michael Marassa Assistant Director for Instructional Technology, Champaign Unit 4 Schools.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
Accessible Test Design Michael Russell. Principles of Universal Design Universal design is the design of products and environments to be usable by all.
Michael Russell Jen Higgins Tom Hoffmann Cara Laitusis Deb Matthews Trinell Bowman Challenges and Solutions in Implementing Accessible Next-Generation.
EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
Robert Aydelotte ExxonMobil - Upstream Technical Computing 13 May 2004 Standardizing Fluid Property Reporting.
Getting Ready for Smarter Balanced Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE Feb. 7, 2014.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
1 Beyond Content Packaging: LETSI’s Open Learning Architecture Avron Barr letsi.org LETSI is an international non-profit federation committed to open standards.
Technology and the Promise of Individualized Learning Ira Goldstein Siena College Computer Science Department.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). All rights reserved.
Introduction My class is a 7 th grade Science class which consist of 20 students total, 11 females-9 males, 4students are special needs and.
CAASPP Online Student Testing Student Participation: General The Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments consist of the following: English Language.
TestNav: Pearson’s Online Testing Engine Training and Practice Item Review Colorado Summative Science and Social Studies Field Test Spring 2013 Call in:
ITIL® Service Asset & Configuration Management Foundations Service Transition Thatcher Deane 02/17/2010.
Software Engineering Process - II 7.1 Unit 7: Quality Management Software Engineering Process - II.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS)
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
About Us Measured Progress, a not-for-profit organization, is a pioneer in authentic, standards-based assessments. We connect the K–12 educational community.
Introduction to DBMS Purpose of Database Systems View of Data
Texas Assessment Management System Student Directory and Send Files
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
Digital Learning rEvolution Program
School Management System Software PPT free
Nursery School Management System Software PPT free
College Management System Software PPT free
Coaching Center Management System Software PPT free
Introduction to DBMS Purpose of Database Systems View of Data
Accessible Test Design
COUNTER Update February 2006.
Presentation transcript:

Accessible Portable Item Profile (APIP) Standard: Key Concepts and Terms

APIP Goals Portability of item content Accessibility of item content Policy neutral yet provide methods that can be applied to meet a wide variety of needs.

APIP: Basic Idea & 3 System Components 1 2 Roster Tools Authoring Tools User Profile Content with Access Tags Roster Tools and Authoring Tools are vendor tools. They don’t both need to come from the same vendor, though that is the likely scenario. These tools create the XML. The user profile includes information about what needs the student has, and possibly their specific setting preferences. Content tags may have additional information for that user. The Testing Interface now knows what the user needs, and how they want their tools set. If needed, additional information is supplied within the Content XML. Best case scenario? Vendors competing with each other to create the best, most accessible student user interface. 3 Testing Interface 3

APIP Test Model

Example Grade Level, Content Area, Standard, Difficulty, etc. Calculator, Formula Sheet, Ruler, Periodic Table, etc. Audio Format, Braille, Sign, Key Word Highlight, etc. Default Content Information Companion Material Information Accessibility Information Inclusion Order Default Item Information Default Item

Standards in the Education Sector Content Standards Performance Standards Data Standards Interoperability Standards

Content Standards Definition of the knowledge, skills, and abilities students are expected to develop State specific Common Core

Performance Standards Level at which students are expected to develop mastery of content standards State-developed summative assessments are one tool used to measure achievement of performance standards Consortia developed assessment programs will be used to measure achievement of Common Core standards

Data Standards Data Standards are documented agreements on representations, formats, and definitions of common data. Data standards improve the quality and share- ability of data by: Increasing data compatibility Improving the consistency and efficiency of data collection Reducing data redundancy

Data Standards Variable Names Expected values/content type Example: Topic: Gender Variable Name: Gen Value: 0 = Female, 1=Male

Data Standard Applied – Topic: Gender Database 1: Variable Name: Gender Value: M = Male, F = Female Database 2: Variable Name: Sex Value: 1=Male, 2=Female Export Conversion DB 1: Gender = Gen, M=0, F=1 DB 2: Sex = Gen, 1=0, 2=1 Import Conversion DB 1: Gen = Gender, 0=M, 1=F DB 2: Gen = Sex, 0=1, 1=2

Commonly Used Educational Data Standards SIF Library Information Curriculum Information Student Information Gender DOB ID # Grade Enrollment Attendance Accommodations Etc.

Interoperability Standards Interoperability is the ability of a system or a product to work with other systems or products without special effort on the part of the customer.

Interoperable Assessments Require Commonly Understood: File format for item content Codes/tags for item content Representation of and interactions with content Scoring rules

Available Assessment and Accessibility Interoperability Standards IMS Access for All QTI Common Cartridge APIP Personal Needs Profile APIP Item Content Standard

Interoperability & Data Standards for Assessment Interoperability standards required for: Item content file format, presentation of that content, interactions with the content, and scoring of responses Data Standards required for: Information about items (e.g., what they measure, parameters) Information about students (e.g., identification, demographics, access needs) Recording results

Key Steps in the Digitally Delivered Assessment Process Student Rostering Student Login Test Administration Assessment System Response Recording Scoring Reporting

Common Core Assessment: Stitching It All Together Common Core State Standards

Common Core Assessment: Stitching It All Together Common Core State Standards SIF IMS Library Information Curriculum Information Student Information Gender DOB ID # Grade Enrollment Attendance Accommodations Etc. Access for All QTI Common Cartridge APIP Personal Needs Profile APIP Item Content Standard

Common Core Assessment: Stitching It All Together Common Core State Standards SIF IMS Library Information Curriculum Information Student Information Gender DOB ID # Grade Enrollment Attendance Accommodations Etc. Access for All QTI Common Cartridge APIP Personal Needs Profile APIP Item Content Standard

Common Core Assessment: Stitching It All Together Common Core State Standards SIF IMS Library Information Curriculum Information Student Information Gender DOB ID # Grade Enrollment Attendance Accommodations Etc. Access for All QTI Common Cartridge APIP Personal Needs Profile APIP Item Content Standard Student Rostering Student Login Test Administration Assessment System Response Recording Scoring Reporting

Common Core Assessment: Stitching It All Together Common Core State Standards SIF IMS Library Information Curriculum Information Student Information Gender DOB ID # Grade Enrollment Attendance Accommodations Etc. Access for All QTI Common Cartridge APIP Personal Needs Profile APIP Item Content Standard Student Rostering Student Login Test Administration Assessment System Response Recording Scoring Reporting

Status of APIP Final Technical Documents Released March 2011 APIP passed to IMS for maintenance and implementation support IMS APIP Work Group ETS, Pearson, CTB, Measured Progress SBAC and PARCC invited and strongly encouraged to join ATP APIP Study Group State RFPs reference or require APIP Implementation launched by MN and test industry

Next Steps Establish touch points between APIP and SIF Student Data Standards Incorporate APIP PNP in Common Education Data Standards Develop business rules and best practices for applying APIP accessibility tags Modify or develop APIP compliant item authoring systems and test delivery systems

Next Steps Continue Educating leaders and educators about APIP and Accessibility Profiles Develop tools to assist in creating sound Personal Needs Profiles Adopt APIP prior to development of RttTA item content