Text proposal for using receiver information

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Month Year John Doe, Some CompanySlide 1 Insert Presentation Title Here Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0032r0 April 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 The new coexistence use cases for IEEE Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 November 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Information exchange between independent IEEE systems Date: xx.
Doc.: IEEE /0340r0 Submission April 2005 Marianna Goldhammer, AlvarionSlide 1 CBP-SG Contention Based Protocol and QoS Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0011r2 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 System architecture for information exchange between independent IEEE
Submission doc.: IEEE /0094r1 November 2015 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Management Considering Interference Alignment Date: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Motivation for Monitor WSO Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0021r1 Janurary 2016 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Application scenario and text change proposal for coexistence management considering.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0015r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal for CM discovery/selection/ association as CE operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0017r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal on proxy coexistence service for moving WSO Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0052r1 March 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Supplemental document for text proposal on amendment to entity operations Date:
Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios
Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Domain – Study group proposal
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
Submission Title: [Power Control for PAC]
Text proposal for using receiver information
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Janurary 2016
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation Modulation] Date Submitted:
March 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY Proposal for the IEEE a standard]
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation Modulation] Date Submitted:
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for sub-GHz Interference Model] Date.
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the MHz Indian.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Aggregated Interference from CPEs
Complex Beacon Pros and Cons
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
MHz FCC Action Date: Authors: March 2005
802.11af Liaison Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Design Principles for Entity Responsibilities
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
FCC rules and design Date: Authors: October 2010
March t Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Simple System Kept Simple]
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
Coexistence of CMs with different decision making algorithms
January 2016 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PHY proposal for the MHz Indian.
Text proposal for using receiver information
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
November, 2003 doc.: IEEE November 2003
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> January 2013
February 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Harmonization of The 15.4g Mandatory Data.
March 2016 Election Results
September 2009doc.: IEEE wng0
Text proposal for using receiver information
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
Neighbor Setting Procedures
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Regulatory Update in Europe for Gigabit Application.
Possible Action Items Date: Author:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
July 2011 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal in Response to Task Group j.
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
Interference-free scheduling
7/27/2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Channel Numbering Proposals] Date Submitted:
September 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suggested TG3c PAR Changes] Date Submitted:
Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
July 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
Measurement of Radio Noise and Interference over 920 MHz band in Japan
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 January 2016
Presentation transcript:

Text proposal for using receiver information doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Month Year February 2016 Text proposal for using receiver information Date: 2016-02-23 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Chen SUN, Sony John Doe, Some Company

doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Month Year February 2016 Abstract In 16/23r0 we have proposed adding receiver information in the IEEE 802.19.1a system in order to improve the coexistence performance As an example, we have shown that knowing the FBMC overlapping K factor of FBMC we can adjust the transmit power to assist the successive interference cancellation (SIC) receiver. This document provides the proposed changes on the current IEEE 802.19.1 standards for adding receiver information Chen SUN, Sony John Doe, Some Company

Why we need receiver information February 2016 Why we need receiver information PCAST: “Recommendation 3.1: The Secretary of Commerce working through the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), in cooperation with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), should establish methodologies for spectrum management that consider both transmitter and receiver characteristics to enable flexible sharing of spectrum. ” [1] IEEE 802.19.1-2014 does not specify exchanging of receiver information for coexistence management Chen SUN, Sony

What is receiver information February 2016 What is receiver information Receiver type Linear receiver such as zero forcing Nonlinear receiver such as successive interference cancellation … Modulation information OFDM FBMC Filter characteristics ACS (existing) Filter overlapping factor Chen SUN, Sony

Use case Consider a CM managing multiple wireless networks (WSOs). February 2016 Use case Consider a CM managing multiple wireless networks (WSOs). The CM knows that some WSOs on the same channel. Some WSOs employ SIC at the receiver side. If the WSO transmitter employ FBMC, the CM can control or suggest the WSO transmitter to use different FBMC overlapping factors so that their transmit power difference is maximized. By maximizing the difference, the SIC performance can be improved. Chen SUN, Sony

Procedure utilized (1/2) February 2016 Procedure utilized (1/2) 5.2.2.1 WSO registration procedure Chen SUN, Sony

Procedures utilized (2/2) February 2016 Procedures utilized (2/2) 5.2.10.1 WSO reconfiguration procedure Chen SUN, Sony

Updated message 1 February 2016 Chen SUN, Sony --Installation parameters InstallationParameters ::= SEQUENCE { --Operating height of master station [m] opMasterHeight REAL OPTIONAL, --Operating height of slave station [m] opSlaveHeight REAL OPTIONAL, --Operating transmission power [dBm] opTxPower REAL OPTIONAL, --Adjacent channel selectivity of the WSO [dB] aCS REAL OPTIONAL, --Adjacent channel leakage ratio of the WSO [dB] aCLR REAL OPTIONAL, --Guaranteed QoS of backhaul connection of the WSO guaranteedQoSOfBackhaulConnection GuaranteedQoSOfBackhaulConnection OPTIONAL, Chen SUN, Sony

Updated message 1 (cont’d) February 2016 Updated message 1 (cont’d) --Receiver information receiverInfo ENUMERATED{ SIC, ...}, --Modulation type modulationType ENUMERATED{ OFDM, FBMC, --Filter characteristics filterCharacteristics SEQUENCE{ --Adjacent channel selectivity of the WSO [dB] aCS REAL OPTIONAL, --FBMC overlapping factor range as the maximum number fbmcOverlappingFactor INTEGER OPTIONAL, ... } Chen SUN, Sony

Updated message2 February 2016 Chen SUN, Sony Annex C (normative) Messages --Reconfiguration request CxMediaReconfigurationRequest ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE { ... --Modulation parameter modulationParameter SEQUENCE OF CHOICE{ ofdm BOOLEAN, --The overlapping K factor for FBMC fbmcoverlappingFactor INTEGER, ...}, --Demodulation procedure sicdemodulationProcedure ENUMERATED{ --demodulate desired signal directly procedure1, --demodulate interference then desired signal procedure2, ...} OPTIONAL } Chen SUN, Sony

Updated message3 February 2016 CxMediaReconfigurationRequest ::= SEQUENCE OF SEQUENCE { ... --Modulation parameter modulation CHOICE{ ofdm BOOLEAN, --The overlapping K factor for FBMC fbmc INTEGER, …}, --Demodulation procedure demodulationProcedure ENUMERATED{ --demodulate desired signal directly procedure1, --demodulate interference then desired signal procedure2} OPTIONAL } Chen SUN, Sony

February 2016 Reference [1] PCAST, “REALIZING THE FULL POTENTIAL OF GOVERNMENT- HELD SPECTRUM TO SPUR ECONOMIC GROWTH,” July 2012 [2] http://www.ict-phydyas.org/ Chen SUN, Sony

Annex 1: FBMC’s signal power January 2016 Annex 1: FBMC’s signal power When the value of filter overlapping factor (K) is different, the generated signal power is different. When the K is set to 1, the generated signal power is minimal, and the normalized transmit signal power is set to 1. When K is set to 2 , 3 or 4, the ratio of generated signal power and the power when K is set to 1, as the normalized signal power corresponding to the K. Overlapping factor (K) Normalized signal power 1 2 k1 3 k2 4 k3 Chen SUN, Sony

Simulation Scenario January 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Month Year January 2016 Simulation Scenario 2 SSs coexist, the cover radius are 100 m, and at a given time instance in each system there is only one pair of users. SS1, the transmitter is in the center and the receiver is uniformly distributed in the strong interference area, where the receiver can not succeed in decoding its own signal. The minimum SINR is set to 12 dB . SS2, the transmitter is in the center and the receiver is uniformly distributed in the each area. The free space path loss are assumed. Waveform parameters (power adjustment factor and filter overlapping factor), user’s location and minimum SINR is known by the eNB. Chen SUN, Sony John Doe, Some Company

January 2016 Annex 2: Transmit power How to decide the filter overlapping factor and power adjustment factor of non-orthogonal spectrum sharing with FBMC and OFDM? Power adjustment factor (P): equivalent to the effect of transmitter power amplifier. The di,j represents the distance between i-th SU and j-th eNB. The represents the minimum SINR of the receiver. SU1 decodes its own signal (called demodulation procedure 1). SU2 decodes the SU1’s signal before its own signal (called demodulation procedure 2) FBMC: K1 (filter overlapping factor of SS1 ) is 4, and K2 is 1 OFDM: K1 is 1, and K2 is 1. FBMC: OFDM: Chen SUN, Sony

Annex 2: Transmit power (2) January 2016 Annex 2: Transmit power (2) SU2 directly demodulate the useful signal (called demodulation procedure 1), SU1 demodulate the interference signal firstly, and demodulate the useful signal secondly (called demodulation procedure 2) FBMC: K1 is 1, and K2 is 4; OFDM: K1 is 1, and K2 is 1. FBMC: OFDM: The power adjustment factor of orthogonal spectrum sharing for curve 1 based P1 and P2 for curve 2: Transmit power is equal to the product of the generated signal power and power adjustment factor. Chen SUN, Sony

Available bandwidth and transmit power as of different values of k January 2016 Available bandwidth and transmit power as of different values of k Case 1: SU1 and SU2 located in the strong interference area Scenario overlapping factor of SS1 overlapping factor of SS2 power adjustment factor of SS1 factor of SS2 Transmit Power of SS1 Power of SS2 Curve 2 1 265.9 13.38 0.13 0.0065 Curve 3 4 0.42 Curve 4 8.32 Curve 5 Strong interference area 同P4所述 Note: The bandwidth and transmit power can be adjusted by different K factors Chen SUN, Sony

Available bandwidth and transmit power as of different values of k January 2016 Available bandwidth and transmit power as of different values of k Case 2: SU1 located in the interference area, SU2 located outside the interference area. Scenario overlapping factor of SS1 overlapping factor of SS2 power adjustment factor of SS1 factor of SS2 Transmit Power of SS1 Power of SS2 Curve 2 1 10.88 515.74 0.0053 0.2521 Curve 3 4 0.34 Curve 4 16.13 Curve 5 Note: The bandwidth and transmit power can be adjusted by different K factors Chen SUN, Sony