Thayne H. Dickey, Sarah E. Altschuler, Deborah S. Wuttke  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Deubiquitination of Lys63-Linkage by a CYLD UBP
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Callum Smits, Peter E. Czabotar, Mark G. Hinds, Catherine L. Day 
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Protein Kinase C Regulation: C1 Meets C-tail
Crystal Structure of a Human Cleavage Factor CFIm25/CFIm68/RNA Complex Provides an Insight into Poly(A) Site Recognition and RNA Looping  Qin Yang, Molly.
The Architecture of Restriction Enzymes
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Shozeb Haider, Gary N. Parkinson, Stephen Neidle  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Global RNA Fold and Molecular Recognition for a pfl Riboswitch Bound to ZMP, a Master Regulator of One-Carbon Metabolism  Aiming Ren, Kanagalaghatta R.
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Crystal Structure of Full-Length Apaf-1: How the Death Signal Is Relayed in the Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis  Thomas Frank Reubold, Sabine Wohlgemuth,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Sachin Surade, Tom L. Blundell  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Karen A. Lewis, Deborah S. Wuttke  Structure 
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Kay Perry, Young Hwang, Frederic D. Bushman, Gregory D. Van Duyne 
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
AMPK and SNF1: Snuffing Out Stress
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
James E. Milner-White, James D. Watson, Guoying Qi, Steven Hayward 
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Yogesh K. Gupta, Deepak T. Nair, Robin P. Wharton, Aneel K. Aggarwal 
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Proteins: Multiple Domains for Multiple Functions  Thayne H. Dickey, Sarah E. Altschuler, Deborah S. Wuttke  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 1074-1084 (July 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of ssDNA-Binding Domains Proteins are colored tan, DNA is colored cyan, oxygen is colored red, nitrogen is colored blue, and sulfur is colored yellow. Regions of interest are highlighted in green. (A) OB-A from RPA70 (Protein Data Bank [PDB] ID code 1JMC) binds ssDNA using aromatic and cation-π-stacking interactions, hydrophobic interactions, and base-mediated H bonds. Variable loop regions are shown in green. (B) KH1 from PCBP1 (PDB ID code 3VKE) binds ssDNA with more phosphate-backbone contacts, but no intermolecular stacking interactions. The conserved GXXG motif is shown in green. (C) RRM1 from hnRNP A1 (PDB ID code 2UP1) binds ssDNA using a variety of interactions similar to those seen in the OB folds and KH domains. Conserved RNP sequence motifs are shown in green. (D) Two of the four subunits of the Why2 complex (PDB ID code 3N1J) are shown in tan and green. The interface has several hydrophobic and stacking interactions, but almost no base-mediated H bonds. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Base-Mediated H Bonds Are Common at Sequence-Specific Interfaces, but Do Not Always Confer Specificity (A) Pot1pN (tan) binds ssDNA (cyan) with many H bonds that confer high specificity (PDB ID code 1QZH). (B) Schematic and high-resolution structures of nucleotide shuffling by TEBP. TEBP accommodates an additional 3′ nucleotide by shuffling bases to the adjacent 5′ binding site, flipping T8 into solvent, and resetting the binding register. Cognate telomeric sequence is shown in cyan (PDB ID code 1JB7) and noncognate is shown in yellow (PDB ID code 1PH1). (C) hnRNP A1 accommodates the unnatural base 2-aminopurine (2AP) by base flipping. 2AP (DNA and protein are shown in yellow) (PDB ID code 1U1P) maintains stacking interactions and maximizes H bonding by 180° rotation around the glycosidic bond relative to the cognate guanine (cyan) (PDB ID code 2UP1). (D) Pot1pC binds two different ssDNA sequences—GGTTACGGT (tan and cyan) (PDB ID code 4HIK) and GGTAACGGT (green and yellow) (PDB ID code 4HIO)—in globally altered binding modes. DNA base and backbone positions differ as well as loop 2/3 of the protein backbone. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ssDNA-Binding Domains Frequently Occur in Multiple Copies Each domain is represented by a shape (circles, OB folds; crescents, RRMs), and separate polypeptide chains are colored differently. (A) As is the case with SSB, single-domain proteins can come together to form obligate complexes. (B) Additionally, single proteins themselves, such as FBP, can contain multiple homologous ssDNA-binding domains. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Multiple Domains Can Be Used for a Variety of Purposes (A) As with SSB, DNA sliding can be achieved by keeping one or more domains bound while another domain repositions itself on the ssDNA ligand. (B) Handoff of an ssDNA ligand could be achieved by sequential dissociation and association of domains. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Polypeptide Linkers Often Connect Domains within a Protein (A) These linkers may reduce specificity of a protein by accommodating spacers of different lengths between two binding sites, as seen in S. pombe Pot1. (B) These linkers may also allow conformational flexibility necessary to bind adjacent ssDNA-binding sites, as seen in the structures of individual KH domains. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Many ssDNA-Binding Proteins Have Multiple Functions that Can Be Regulated in a Variety of Ways (A) Protein-protein interactions can affect ssDNA-binding ability. (B) Posttranslational modifications can affect protein-protein interactions and/or cellular localization. (C) Alternative splicing, illustrated here by a reduction in linker length, can affect protein-protein interactions, posttranslational modification, and/or cellular localization. (D) ssDNA sequence, length, or shape may affect function in as-yet unknown ways. Structure 2013 21, 1074-1084DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.05.013) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions