Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages (October 1999)
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Peter Trickey, Mary Ann Wagner, Marilyn Schuman Jorns, F Scott Mathews 
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Firefly luciferase: the structure is known, but the mystery remains
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
The 1. 6 Å Crystal Structure of E
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (May 1994)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1995)
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal structure of firefly luciferase throws light on a superfamily of adenylate-forming enzymes  Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 287-298 (March 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0

Figure 1 The reaction catalyzed by firefly luciferase. In the first (activation) step, the substrate D-luciferin (Luc-COOH; 4,5-dihydro-2-[6-hydroxy-2-benzothiazolyl]-4-thiazolecarboxylic acid) is activated by acylation of its carboxylate group with the α-phosphate of ATP, resulting in the formation of an enzyme-bound luciferyl adenylate (Enzyme:Luc-CO-AMP) and release of pyrophosphate (PPi). In the second (oxidation) step, luciferyl adenylate reacts with stoichiometric amounts of molecular oxygen, via an α-peroxylactone intermediate [61], producing an enzyme-bound excited-state product (Enzyme:Luc=O∗). This excited-stated product then decays to the ground state (oxyluciferin; Luc=O) emitting yellow-green light. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 2 Ribbon representations of the firefly luciferase molecule shown in two orthogonal views. The three subdomains of the large N-terminal domain are shown in blue (β-sheet A), purple (β-sheet B) and green (β-barrel) and the small C-terminal domain is shown in yellow. Disordered loops are drawn in violet. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 2 Ribbon representations of the firefly luciferase molecule shown in two orthogonal views. The three subdomains of the large N-terminal domain are shown in blue (β-sheet A), purple (β-sheet B) and green (β-barrel) and the small C-terminal domain is shown in yellow. Disordered loops are drawn in violet. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 3 Stereo α-carbon trace viewed in a similar orientation to Figure 2a, with some sequence numbering for reference. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 4 Overall topology of the firefly luciferase enzyme. (a) Topological diagram illustrating the secondary structure elements coloured by subdomains. The circles represent α-helices, which have been numbered sequentially, and the arrows represent β-strands, which have been numbered sequentially for each of the five β-sheets, A–E. The secondary structural elements have been assigned using the program DSSP [12]. (b) Schematic drawing showing the location of the subdomains in the sequence, using the same colouring scheme. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 4 Overall topology of the firefly luciferase enzyme. (a) Topological diagram illustrating the secondary structure elements coloured by subdomains. The circles represent α-helices, which have been numbered sequentially, and the arrows represent β-strands, which have been numbered sequentially for each of the five β-sheets, A–E. The secondary structural elements have been assigned using the program DSSP [12]. (b) Schematic drawing showing the location of the subdomains in the sequence, using the same colouring scheme. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 5 Internal structural homology. (a) Stereo representation of β-sheets A and B of the large N-terminal domain showing the twofold-related secondary structure elements from sheet A (blue) and sheet B (purple), viewed down the local molecular dyad axis. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) (b) Topological diagram of β-sheets A and B, highlighting in different patterns the structural elements of the two symmetry-related modules. Secondary structural elements that do not obey the twofold axis are left as open circles and arrows. The figure includes a schematic drawing showing the location of the two modules along the sequence. (c) Topological diagram, as in (b), showing the preferred choice of symmetry-related modules, with their respective locations along the sequence. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 5 Internal structural homology. (a) Stereo representation of β-sheets A and B of the large N-terminal domain showing the twofold-related secondary structure elements from sheet A (blue) and sheet B (purple), viewed down the local molecular dyad axis. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) (b) Topological diagram of β-sheets A and B, highlighting in different patterns the structural elements of the two symmetry-related modules. Secondary structural elements that do not obey the twofold axis are left as open circles and arrows. The figure includes a schematic drawing showing the location of the two modules along the sequence. (c) Topological diagram, as in (b), showing the preferred choice of symmetry-related modules, with their respective locations along the sequence. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 5 Internal structural homology. (a) Stereo representation of β-sheets A and B of the large N-terminal domain showing the twofold-related secondary structure elements from sheet A (blue) and sheet B (purple), viewed down the local molecular dyad axis. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) (b) Topological diagram of β-sheets A and B, highlighting in different patterns the structural elements of the two symmetry-related modules. Secondary structural elements that do not obey the twofold axis are left as open circles and arrows. The figure includes a schematic drawing showing the location of the two modules along the sequence. (c) Topological diagram, as in (b), showing the preferred choice of symmetry-related modules, with their respective locations along the sequence. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 6 A region of the (2Fobs–Fcalc) electron-density map in the large N-terminal domain, which has been contoured at the 1σ level. The electron density is shown in blue and the refined model is coloured according to atom type, with carbon atoms in yellow, oxygens in red, nitrogens in blue and sulphurs in green. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 7 Amino acid sequence of firefly luciferase with the relative positions of the secondary structure elements specified with the same name and colour coding used in Figure 4a. The boxed residues represent the invariant (red) and homologous (more than 50% identical; pink) amino acids, as derived from an alignment of 38 sequences including 9 firefly luciferases, 18 acyl-CoA ligases and 11 activating domains of peptide synthetases. All ligase and peptide synthetase sequences were taken from version 32 of the SWISSPROT database. The firefly luciferase sequences were taken from the SWISSPROT database, the EMBL database and [63]. Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 8 Location of the active site. (a) Stereo representation of the concave molecular surface of the large N-terminal domain of firefly luciferase, looking down onto the Y-shaped system of valleys with β-sheet A on the left-hand side, β-sheet B on the right-hand side and the β-barrel at the top. The colouring scheme represents the level of similarity observed between the sequences of 38 acylating enzymes. The colours range from blue for the hypervariable residues, through white, to red for the three invariant residues Lys206, Glu344 and Asp422. (The surface was calculated and displayed using the program GRASP [64].) (b) Stereo representation of the active site of firefly luciferase, viewed in a similar orientation to (a), showing some of the well-conserved residues in the superfamily of adenylate-forming enzymes. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)

Figure 8 Location of the active site. (a) Stereo representation of the concave molecular surface of the large N-terminal domain of firefly luciferase, looking down onto the Y-shaped system of valleys with β-sheet A on the left-hand side, β-sheet B on the right-hand side and the β-barrel at the top. The colouring scheme represents the level of similarity observed between the sequences of 38 acylating enzymes. The colours range from blue for the hypervariable residues, through white, to red for the three invariant residues Lys206, Glu344 and Asp422. (The surface was calculated and displayed using the program GRASP [64].) (b) Stereo representation of the active site of firefly luciferase, viewed in a similar orientation to (a), showing some of the well-conserved residues in the superfamily of adenylate-forming enzymes. (Generated using the program MOLSCRIPT [62].) Structure 1996 4, 287-298DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00033-0)