Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Kobe C. Yuen, Baoshan Xu, Ian D. Krantz, Jennifer L. Gerton 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Dynamic change of transcription pausing through modulating NELF protein stability regulates granulocytic differentiation by Xiuli Liu, Aishwarya A. Gogate,
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
TNFα Signaling Exposes Latent Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites to Alter the Breast Cancer Cell Transcriptome  Hector L. Franco, Anusha Nagari, W. Lee Kraus 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Minchul Kim, Taekhoon Kim, Randy L. Johnson, Dae-Sik Lim  Cell Reports 
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Laura S. Bisogno, Matthew B. Friedersdorf, Jack D. Keene
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Wei Jiang, Yuting Liu, Rui Liu, Kun Zhang, Yi Zhang  Cell Reports 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Promotion Effects of miR-375 on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose- Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells  Si Chen, Yunfei Zheng, Shan Zhang, Lingfei.
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
A Sox Transcription Factor Is a Critical Regulator of Adult Stem Cell Proliferation in the Drosophila Intestine  Fanju W. Meng, Benoît Biteau  Cell Reports 
The INO80 Complex Removes H2A
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (March 2016)
Doxorubicin Enhances Nucleosome Turnover around Promoters
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
The Epithelial Circumferential Actin Belt Regulates YAP/TAZ through Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of Merlin  Kana T. Furukawa, Kazunari Yamashita, Natsuki.
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e6 (January 2019)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (September 2018)
Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 943-952 (October 2017) The Histone Variant H2A.Z Is a Master Regulator of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition  Renae Domaschenz, Sebastian Kurscheid, Maxim Nekrasov, Shuyi Han, David J. Tremethick  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 943-952 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inhibition of H2A.Z Expression Mimics TGF-β in Inducing EMT (A) qRT-PCR analyses of H2A.Z gene expression relative to the Ribosomal Protein Lateral Stalk Subunit P0 (RPLPO) gene in MDCK cells following 72 hr post-transduction with pLVTHM shH2A.Z or pLVTHM shScrambled vector. Error bars denote SD of the mean (n = 4; ∗∗∗p < 0.0005). (B) Western blot analysis of H2A.Z and H2A protein expression following H2A.Z knockdown. (C) Representative phase-contrast photomicrograph images of mesenchymal-like changes in MDCK cells treated with 5 ng/mL TGF-β for 3 days. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Representative phase-contrast photomicrograph images of mesenchymal-like changes in H2A.Z knockdown cells at 6 days post-transduction. Scale bar, 200 μm. (E) Cell migration was determined using a Transwell migration assay for untreated and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells (SD of the mean, n = 3; ∗∗p < 0.005). (F) Cell migration was determined using a Transwell migration assay for shH2A.Z and shScrambled transduced cells (SD of the mean, n = 3; ∗∗p < 0.005). (G) Representative clonogenic formation assay of untreated or TGF-β-treated MDCK cells (n = 3). (H) Representative clonogenic formation assay of shH2A.Z- and shScrambled-transduced cells. (I) Proliferation of untreated and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells at days 0, 3, and 5 (SD of the mean, n = 3; ∗∗p < 0.005). (J) Proliferation of shScrambled and shH2A.Z cells at days 0, 3, and 4 post-transduction (SD of the mean, n = 3; ∗∗p < 0.005). See also Figures S1, S2, S3, and S6. Cell Reports 2017 21, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Knockdown of H2A.Z Mimics TGF-β in Inducing the EMT Gene Expression Program (A) Heatmap showing the behavior (upregulated is indicated in red; downregulated is indicated in green) of epithelial marker genes, and mesenchymal marker genes in MDCK cells following treatment with TGF-β or knockdown of H2A.Z for 6 days. Genes with a q value >0.1 are indicated in gray as “not significant” (N.S.). RNA-seq experiments were performed in triplicate. (B) The table summarizes the number of differentially expressed genes upon treatment with TGF-β or knockdown of H2A.Z. (C) Differentially expressed EMT genes in MDCK cells treated with TGF-β. Log2 fold changes in gene expression are plotted against the inverted log10-transformed q values (adjusted p values for multiple testing). The plots broadly illustrate that epithelial genes (red) are downregulated and that mesenchymal genes (blue) are upregulated following both treatments. The expression changes of H2AFZ (green) and TGFβ1 (purple) are also shown. (D) Differentially expressed EMT genes in MDCK cells with H2A.Z knockdown. Generally, TGF-β treatment has a stronger effect than H2A.Z knockdown on differential gene expression. See also Figures S2, S5, and S7 and Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. Cell Reports 2017 21, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 H2A.Z Nucleosomes Positioned Upstream or Downstream of the TSS Have Opposing Functions in Gene Expression (A) Metagene plots of input-subtracted coverage (RPKM) were aligned between −1.5 and +1.5 kb from the TSS for downregulated genes in untreated (MDCK-WT [wild-type]; green) and TGF-β-treated (TGF-β; purple) MDCK cells. The corresponding difference plot (untreated coverage subtracted from TGF-β-treated coverage) is shown in gray, in which the shaded areas indicate the propagated SEM. H2A.Z ChIP-seq experiments were performed in duplicate. (B) Metagene plots of input-subtracted coverage (RPKM) were aligned between −1.5 and +1.5 kb from the TSS for upregulated genes for untreated (MDCK-WT; green) and TGF-β-treated (TGF-β; purple) MDCK cells. The corresponding difference plot (untreated coverage subtracted from TGF-β-treated coverage) is shown in gray, in which the shaded areas indicate the propagated SEM. H2A.Z ChIP-seq experiments were performed in duplicate. (C) Spearman correlation between changes in EMT gene expression and histone variant H2A.Z occupation in 100-bp sliding windows across ±1.5 kb from the TSS. The strongest positive correlation upstream of the TSS approximates the −2 nucleosome position from the TSS. A negative correlation between the H2A.Z signal and the change in gene expression is displayed downstream of the TSS, at the approximate +1 nucleosome position. (D) In order to explore which specific genes drive the positive correlation, we plotted the changes in H2A.Z signal against estimated log2 fold changes in gene expression between untreated and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells. At the approximate −2 nucleosome, the epithelial marker EPCAM is among the genes with the greatest loss of H2A.Z while simultaneously showing approximately −3.5 log2 fold change in gene expression. (E) In order to explore which specific genes drive the negative correlation, we plotted the changes in H2A.Z signal against estimated log2 fold changes in gene expression between untreated and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells. At the +1 position, the master regulator gene of EMT, TGFB1, displayed the most pronounced loss of H2A.Z, while simultaneously being upregulated (∼1.5 log2 fold). Cell Reports 2017 21, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 H2A.Z Coordinates EMT by Serving as Both an Activator and Repressor of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Gene Expression (A) Coverage plots of input-subtracted H2A.Z signal (RPKM) across the TSS of EPCAM for untreated MDCK cells (MDCK-WT; green) and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells (TGF-β; blue). (B) Coverage plots of input-subtracted H2A.Z signal (RPKM) across the TSS of TGFB1 for untreated MDCK cells (MDCK-WT; green) and TGF-β-treated MDCK cells (TGF-β; blue). (C) TGF-β regulates both epithelial and mesenchymal gene expression by inducing the loss of H2A.Z. The loss of H2A.Z upstream or downstream of the TSS correlates with gene repression and activation, respectively. For EpCAM, gene repression is also associated with the formation of a +1 H2A.Z-containing nucleosome. See also Figures S3 and S4. Cell Reports 2017 21, 943-952DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.086) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions