Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
Advertisements

Identification of a Stat Gene That Functions in Drosophila Development
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Marc Furriols, Sarah Bray  Current Biology 
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Savitha Kalidas, Dean P. Smith  Neuron 
Bearded Family Members Inhibit Neuralized-Mediated Endocytosis and Signaling Activity of Delta in Drosophila  Allison J. Bardin, François Schweisguth 
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Control of Fat Storage by a Drosophila PAT Domain Protein
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Persistent Expression of Genes of the Enhancer of Split Complex Suppresses Neural Development in Drosophila  Keiko Nakao, José A. Campos-Ortega  Neuron 
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Hedgehog Movement Is Regulated through tout velu–Dependent Synthesis of a Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan  Inge The, Yohanns Bellaiche, Norbert Perrimon 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
Shinobu Chiba, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Stephen A. Thacker, Peter C. Bonnette, Robert J. Duronio 
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Evolution of Ftz protein function in insects
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Yingqun Huang, Joan A. Steitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages (June 1997)
Qiong A. Liu, Michael O. Hengartner  Current Biology 
Pipe-Dependent Ventral Processing of Easter by Snake Is the Defining Step in Drosophila Embryo DV Axis Formation  Yong Suk Cho, Leslie M. Stevens, David.
Elizabeth H. Chen, Eric N. Olson  Developmental Cell 
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Identification of a Stat Gene That Functions in Drosophila Development
The Regulation of the Drosophila msl-2 Gene Reveals a Function for Sex-lethal in Translational Control  Greg J Bashaw, Bruce S Baker  Cell  Volume 89,
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (July 2001)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages (September 2002)
Analysis of partner of inscuteable, a Novel Player of Drosophila Asymmetric Divisions, Reveals Two Distinct Steps in Inscuteable Apical Localization 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Dpl-1 DP and efl-1 E2F Act with lin-35 Rb to Antagonize Ras Signaling in C. elegans Vulval Development  Craig J. Ceol, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 16, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
The Drosophila Cell Survival Gene discs lost Encodes a Cytoplasmic Codanin-1-like Protein, Not a Homolog of Tight Junction PDZ Protein Patj  Jan Pielage,
Nuclear Access and Action of Notch In Vivo
The Drosophila dCREB2 Gene Affects the Circadian Clock
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Ectodermal Syndecan-2 Mediates Left-Right Axis Formation in Migrating Mesoderm as a Cell-Nonautonomous Vg1 Cofactor  Kenneth L. Kramer, H.Joseph Yost 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
Bih-Hwa Shieh, Mei-Ying Zhu  Neuron 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (June 2004)
Geanette Lam, Carl S. Thummel  Current Biology 
The DHR78 Nuclear Receptor Is Required for Ecdysteroid Signaling during the Onset of Drosophila Metamorphosis  Gregory J Fisk, Carl S Thummel  Cell  Volume.
Danna K Morris, Victoria Lundblad  Current Biology 
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Indirect evidence for Delta-dependent intracellular processing of Notch in Drosophila embryos  Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology  Volume 8, Issue 13, Pages 771-775 (June 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70300-8

Figure 1 Structure and signalling activity of Gal4–Nintra. (a) Structure of the UAS–m5–lacZ construct and strategy, using Gal4, to tether the intracellular domain of Notch at the positions of the Su(H)-binding sites within the regulatory sequences of the E(spl)-m5 gene. The four Su(H)-binding sites, whose nucleotide positions are indicated, were substituted by UAS elements to which Gal4 binds. The reporter gene was lacZ. The position of the transcriptional start site is indicated by an arrow. (b) Diagram of the hs>polyA>Gal4–Nintra construct, where > indicates the Flp recombinase target (FRT) sequence. A DNA fragment encoding the DNA-binding domain of Gal4 (amino acids 1 –147) was inserted between sequence encoding a 4 amino acid long translational start (MAGS; in the single-letter amino-acid code) and the intracellular domain of Notch (amino acids 1791–2703). Conditional expression of this Gal4–Nintra fusion protein was regulated by the heat-inducible hsp70 promoter, and by an FRT–polyA–FRT cassette that was inserted between the promoter and the coding sequence. This polyadenylation signal blocked Gal4–Nintra expression from the leaky hsp70 promoter. Expression of Gal4–Nintra therefore required the Flp-recombinase-induced deletion of this signal. The positions of FRT sequences (black dots) and polyadenylation signals (inverted arrows) are indicated. Cloning details are available in Supplementary material published with this paper on the internet. (c,d) Cuticular preparations from (c) hs>polyA>Gal4–Nintra/+ and (d) hs>Gal4–Nintra/+ adult flies that had been exposed to heat shock for 1 h at 37°C 6–9 h after puparium formation. (d) Strong microchaete-loss and macrochaete-double-socket phenotypes were specifically observed following Flp-recombinase-mediated deletion of the FRT–polyA–FRT cassette. Current Biology 1998 8, 771-775DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70300-8)

Figure 2 Transcriptional activity of Gal4–Nintra. In situ hybridization analysis of whole-mount embryos using a lacZ probe. (a–f) Lateral views of stage 10 embryos of the following genotypes: (a) m5–lacZ/+; (b) UAS–m5–lacZ/+; (c,d) UAS–m5–lacZ/hs>Gal4–Nintra (in panel c, the embryo was exposed to a 20 min heat shock at 37°C, followed by 20 min at 25°C; in panel d, no heat shock was applied); (e) DlrevF10 UAS–m5–lacZ/D/9P39 hs>Gal4–Nintra; (f)Su(H)SF8 FRT40A/Su(H)AR9 UAS–m5–lacZ; hs>Gal4–Nintra/+ mutant embryos derived from maternal Su(H) germ-line clones [8]. In (c–f), the FRT–polyA–FRT cassette was removed by Flp-mediated recombination in males carrying a β2-tubulin–flp transgene [9] (the frequency of excision was 0.6). The faint, out-of-focus, striped pattern seen in (b) is due to the expression of UAS–m5–lacZ in the tracheal pit anlagen (see Figure 4a). The abbreviations are: wt, wild type; +hs, heat shock applied; −hs, no heat shock applied. Current Biology 1998 8, 771-775DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70300-8)

Figure 3 A nuclear-activity assay for Notch intracellular processing: structure and expression of Gal4–Nfl. (a) Strategy used to detect Notch intracellular processing: binding of DI to Gal4–Nfl (see panel d) induces the release of an intracellular fragment that is structurally similar to Gal4–Nintra from the plasma membrane, which, following nuclear translocation, activates UAS–m5–lacZ transcription. (b)In situ hybridization analysis of a stage 10 ftz>lacZ>Gal4–Nfl embryo (dorsal view) showing lacZ expression driven by the ftz promoter. (c) Western blot analysis of Notch and Gal4–Nfl in UAS–m5–lacZ (control; lanes 1,3) and ftz>Gal4–Nfl (lanes 2,4) stage 9–11 embryos, using anti-Notch (C17-9C6; lanes 1,2) and anti-Myc (9E10; lanes 3,4) antibodies. The unprocessed 300–320 kDa Notch and Gal4–Nfl bands are indicated by arrows (a shorter exposure of this part of the gel is shown at the bottom of the panel). The position of a processed 130–140 kDa Gal4–Nfl form is indicated by an arrowhead. (d) Diagram of the ftz>lacZ>Gal4–Nfl construct. DNA fragments encoding five Myc epitope tags and the DNA-binding domain of Gal4 (amino acids 1–147) were inserted, within a cDNA encoding full-length Notch (amino acids 1–2703), at a point that was 27 codons 3′ to the sequence encoding the transmembrane domain (TM; amino acids 1746–1765), to generate Gal4–Nfl. Expression of Gal4–Nfl was regulated by ftz regulatory sequences (nucleotides −669 to +70). An FRT–lacZ–polyA–FRT cassette was inserted between the ftz promoter and the Gal4–Nfl coding sequence. Current Biology 1998 8, 771-775DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70300-8)

Figure 4 Transcriptional activity of Gal4–Nfl. In situ hybridization analysis of whole-mount embryos using a lacZ probe. (a–d) Dorsal views of stage 10 embryos of the following genotype: (a) UAS–m5–lacZ/+; lacZ expression at tracheal pit anlagen served as an internal control for staining; (b) UAS–m5–lacZ/ftz>Gal4–Nfl; (c) Dl9P39 UAS–m5–lacZ/DlrevF10 ftz>Gal4–Nfl; (d) UAS–m5–lacZ Df(3R)b32.2/ftz>Gal4–Nfl Df(3R)b32.2. Expression of Gal4–Nfl induced the expression of lacZ in the ventral neuroectoderm (compare panels a and b). (c) Expression of lacZ was not detected in the neuroectoderm of Dl-mutant embryos. In contrast, lacZ expression was similar in mutant embryos carrying a deletion in the E(spl) complex, and wildtype embryos (compare panels b and d). Df(3R)b32.2 removes all basic helix-loop-helix genes in the E(spl) complex, UAS–m5–lacZ expression was transient in E(spl)-mutant embryos, however. This is probably because the expression of Dl is dramatically reduced in E(spl)-mutant embryos from stage 11 onwards [15]. Current Biology 1998 8, 771-775DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70300-8)