Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Heat shock phenocopies E1B-55K late functions and selectively sensitizes refractory tumor cells to ONYX-015 oncolytic viral therapy  Clodagh C. O’Shea,
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
The Interferon-Inducible MxB Protein Inhibits HIV-1 Infection
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
UCHL1 Regulates Melanogenesis through Controlling MITF Stability in Human Melanocytes  Eun Young Seo, Seon-Pil Jin, Kyung-Cheol Sohn, Chi-Hyun Park, Dong.
Rui Pedro Galão, Suzanne Pickering, Rachel Curnock, Stuart J.D. Neil 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Slicing-Independent RISC Activation Requires the Argonaute PAZ Domain
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
HBL1 Is a Human Long Noncoding RNA that Modulates Cardiomyocyte Development from Pluripotent Stem Cells by Counteracting MIR1  Juli Liu, Yang Li, Bo Lin,
TET3 Inhibits Type I IFN Production Independent of DNA Demethylation
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Promotion Effects of miR-375 on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose- Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells  Si Chen, Yunfei Zheng, Shan Zhang, Lingfei.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
High-Throughput Fitness Profiling of Zika Virus E Protein Reveals Different Roles for Glycosylation during Infection of Mammalian and Mosquito Cells 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Margaret Tarrant-Elorza, Cyprian C. Rossetto, Gregory S. Pari 
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Emma Abernathy, Sarah Gilbertson, Ravi Alla, Britt Glaunsinger 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
The Epithelial Circumferential Actin Belt Regulates YAP/TAZ through Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of Merlin  Kana T. Furukawa, Kazunari Yamashita, Natsuki.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
The lncRNA PDIA3P Interacts with miR-185-5p to Modulate Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Targeting Cyclin D2  Cheng-Cao Sun, Ling Zhang, Guang.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Michael U. Shiloh, Paolo Manzanillo, Jeffery S. Cox 
Regulation of KSHV Lytic Switch Protein Expression by a Virus-Encoded MicroRNA: An Evolutionary Adaptation that Fine-Tunes Lytic Reactivation  Priya Bellare,
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Dengue Virus-Induced Autophagy Regulates Lipid Metabolism
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 642-653 (November 2016) A Herpesvirus Protein Selectively Inhibits Cellular mRNA Nuclear Export  Danyang Gong, Yong Hoon Kim, Yuchen Xiao, Yushen Du, Yafang Xie, Kevin K. Lee, Jun Feng, Nisar Farhat, Dawei Zhao, Sara Shu, Xinghong Dai, Sumit K. Chanda, Tariq M. Rana, Nevan J. Krogan, Ren Sun, Ting-Ting Wu  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 642-653 (November 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 ORF10 Induces Poly(A)+ RNA Accumulation in the Nucleus Poly(A)+ RNA was detected by in situ oligo(dT) hybridization. The poly(A)+ RNA signals of all cells (n > 24) across four fields were quantified with ImageJ, and the Nu/Cy signal ratio was calculated and plotted as mean ± SD. (A and B) SLK cells were infected with MHV-68 for the indicated hours (A), and the Nu/Cy signal ratio of poly(A)+ RNA is shown in (B). (C and D) SLK cells were mock-infected (M) or infected with wild-type (WT) MHV-68, the ORF10-null mutant (10S), or the revertant (10R) virus at an MOI of 3 for 15 hr (C), and the Nu/Cy signal ratio of poly(A)+ RNA is shown in (D). (E and F) SLK cells were transfected with YFP-ORF10, ORF10-FLAG, or empty vectors (E), and the Nu/Cy signal ratio of poly(A)+ RNA is shown in (F). Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ORF10 Interacts with Rae1 and Further Forms a Complex with Nup98 (A) ORF10 interacts with Rae1 in coIP. (B) Rae1 mediates the interaction between ORF10 and Nup98. (C) ORF10, Rae1, and Nup98 form a complex in sequential IP. (D) Localization of ORF10 during MHV-68 infection. SLK cells were infected with the FLAG-tagged ORF10 MHV-68 virus (MHV68-F10), and, after 16 hr, cells were fixed and subjected to immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with αFLAG and αNup98 antibody. (E) Nuclear envelope enrichment of ORF10 requires Rae1 and Nup98. SLK cells were transfected with control siRNA (siCtl) or siRNA against Rae1 or Nup98 for 2 days, followed by infection with the MHV68-F10 virus. 16 hr later, cells were fixed and subjected to IFA with αFLAG antibody. Scale bars, 20 μm. See also Figure S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Interaction with Rae1 Is Required for ORF10 to Induce Nuclear Accumulation of Poly(A)+ RNA (A) Increasing the expression of Rae1 reverts nuclear poly(A)+ RNA accumulation induced by ORF10. SLK cells were co-transfected with a fixed amount (100 ng) of ORF10-FLAG and increasing amounts of HA-Rae1 and then subjected to in situ oligo(dT) hybridization and IFA with αFLAG antibody. (B) The Nu/Cy signal ratio of poly(A)+ RNA in (A). ORF10-negative cells were quantified as mock. Signal in all cells across four fields was quantified with ImageJ, and data are represented as mean ± SD. (C) Site-specific mutagenesis of ORF10 identified the mutations at three sites that disrupt the interaction with Rae1. (D) Distribution of poly(A)+ RNA in cells expressing WT or loss-of-interaction mutants of ORF10 was examined by in situ oligo(dT) hybridization, and ORF10 expression was examined by IFA with αFLAG antibody. (E) The Nu/Cy signal ratio of poly(A)+ RNA in (D) determined as in (B). Scale bars, 20 μm. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ORF10 Inhibits Gene Expression through Blocking mRNA Export (A) ORF10 inhibits GFP reporter expression. 293T cells were transfected with pEGFP-C1 and ORF10-FLAG or vector control, and, 2 days later, GFP expression was visualized under a fluorescence microscope. (B) ORF10 inhibits nuclear export of GFP mRNA. The Cy and Nu RNAs were purified from transfected cells in (A), and the GFP transcript was quantified by qRT-PCR. The Nu/Cy ratio was plotted as mean ± SD (n = 3). (C) ORF10 induces hyperadenylation of nuclear GFP RNA. The Cy and Nu RNAs from transfected cells in (A) were subjected to northern blotting with the labeled GFP or GAPDH probe. (D) Rae1 knockdown reduces GFP reporter expression. (E) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (D). (F) Expression of the indicated proteins was analyzed by western blotting. (G) The loss-of-interaction ORF10 mutants failed to reduce GFP expression. (H) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (G). All fluorescence data with error bars are plotted as mean ± SD (n = 5). Scale bars, 100 μm. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 ORF10 Inhibits Gene Expression via the 3′ UTR (A) ORF10 inhibits GFP expression from pEGFP-C1, but not from pEGFP-3′GAPDH or pEGFP-3′GH. (B) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (A). (C) The Cy and Nu RNAs were purified from transfected cells and analyzed by northern blotting with the labeled GFP probe. Images from both short and long exposure are shown. (D) Effect of Rae1 knockdown on GFP reporter expression. (E) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (D). (F) Expression of the indicated proteins was analyzed by western blotting. Scale bars, 100 μm. All data with error bars are plotted as mean ± SD (n = 5). Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ORF10 Inhibits mRNA Export of Cellular Genes (A) The Cy and Nu RNAs were purified from transfected cells and quantified for the transcript level of RUNX1 and RBL2 by qRT-PCR. The Nu/Cy ratio was plotted as mean ± SD (n = 3). (B) Expression of RUNX1 and RBL2 proteins in transfected cells was analyzed by western blotting. (C) An inducible cell line of ORF10 was transfected with Rae1 siRNA or control siRNA and then treated with tetracycline to induce ORF10 expression. Two days later, expression of RBL2 and RUNX1 was analyzed by western blotting. (D) The GFP constructs fused with the 3′ UTR of RBL2 (pEGFP-3′RBL2) or RUNX1 (pEGFP-3′RUNX1) are sensitive to ORF10 inhibition. (E) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity in (D). (F) The Nu/Cy ratio of GFP RNA in the cells in (D) is plotted as mean ± SD (n = 3). Scale bars, 100 μm. See also Figures S3, S4, and S5 and Tables S2, S3, and S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Efficient KSHV Late Gene Expression Requires ORF10 and Its Interaction with Rae1 (A) KSHV latently infected iSLK cells, iSLK-WT, iSLK-10S, and iSLK-10R, were transfected with Rae1 siRNA or control siRNA and then treated with doxycycline and sodium butyrate to induce viral lytic replication. The supernatants were collected to quantify infectious virions. Data are plotted as mean ± SD (n = 3). (B) The lysates were harvested from cells in (A) for analyzing viral and cellular protein expression. (C) Infectious virion production from KSHV WT or ORF10 mutants, including 10S, two clones of 10m5, and two clones of 10m10. (D) Viral and cellular protein expression. (E) Genome-wide analysis of viral lytic gene expression for the WT and ORF10 mutants. Total RNAs were purified from iSLK-WT, iSLK-10S, iSLK-10m5#1, and iSLK-10m10#1 cells and subjected to RNA sequencing. The relative viral gene expression to the WT virus was plotted as mean ± SD (n = 3). See also Figure S6 and Tables S5 and S6. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 642-653DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.004) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions