Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Protein Occupancy Landscape of a Bacterial Genome
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Lu Bai, Andrej Ondracka, Frederick R. Cross  Molecular Cell 
Prospects for Riboswitch Discovery and Analysis
m6A Facilitates eIF4F-Independent mRNA Translation
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Sigma and RNA Polymerase: An On-Again, Off-Again Relationship?
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Mechanism of Transcription Termination by RNA Polymerase III Utilizes a Non-template Strand Sequence-Specific Signal Element  Aneeshkumar G. Arimbasseri,
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Organization of an Activator-Bound RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Polycomb Protein Ezh1 Promotes RNA Polymerase II Elongation
The Activation Potential of MOF Is Constrained for Dosage Compensation
Structure of an RNA Silencing Complex of the CRISPR-Cas Immune System
Pcf11 Is a Termination Factor in Drosophila that Dismantles the Elongation Complex by Bridging the CTD of RNA Polymerase II to the Nascent Transcript 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
The Ribosome as an Optimal Decoder: A Lesson in Molecular Recognition
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
RNA Displacement and Resolution of the Transcription Bubble during Transcription by T7 RNA Polymerase  Manli Jiang, Na Ma, Dmitry G. Vassylyev, William.
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Irina Artsimovitch, Georgi A. Belogurov  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 357-366 (November 2005) Holoenzyme Switching and Stochastic Release of Sigma Factors from RNA Polymerase In Vivo  Marni Raffaelle, Elenita I. Kanin, Jennifer Vogt, Richard R. Burgess, Aseem Z. Ansari  Molecular Cell  Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 357-366 (November 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Organization and Sequence of rrn Operons (A) Schematic of the rrn operons. (B) Sequence of the rrnB P1 promoter region from −60 to +10. The transcription initiation site (+1) is indicated. −10 and –35 consensus regions recognized by Eσ70 are underlined. Matches to consensus sequences for EσS and Eσ32 are indicated above and below, respectively. Consensus sequences for EσS are from Gaal et al. (2001) (top) and Weber et al. (2005) (bottom). Consensus sequences for Eσ32 are from Wang and deHaseth (2003) (top) and Cowing et al. (1985) (bottom). Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Association of σ70 and β′ with the rrn Operon A representative rrn operon is shown in black bars, and the orange bands indicate the positions that were probed for σ70 and β′ (RNAP) binding. The numbers represent positions from the major transcription start site, and P1 and P2 represent the major and minor rrn promoters. Relative occupancy (EΔCt) on the y axis represents the enrichment of the DNA immunoprecipitated with antibodies for σ70 or β′ (see Experimental Procedures and Pfaffl, 2001 for details). (A) In rapidly growing cells, σ70 ChIP signal monotonously decreases across the 16S coding region. β′ occupancy is highest at the promoter and then plateaus at a decreased level beyond the promoter. (B) In the presence of rifampicin, both σ70 and β′ are trapped at the promoter. (C) σ70 dissociation was plotted versus time and fit to an exponential decay equation (EΔCt=y0+(max−y0)eoff−kt) to determine the approximate off rate. Assuming an elongation rate of 90 nt/s, we determined a half-life of ∼4 s (t1/2 = ln(2)/koff). The inset presents a corrected plot of the ratio σ70/β versus time, which gave a half-life of ∼7 s. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Association of σS, σ70, and β′ with rrn and gadA in Stationary Phase (A) σS is present at the rrn promoter, but not in the operon, under stationary-phase growth conditions. β′ occupancy displays some polarity under these conditions. In the presence of rifampicin (lower), EσS and very low levels of Eσ70 are trapped at the promoter. (B) For the stationary-phase-specific gene gadA, EσS binds the promoter (P) robustly and is detected at 550 bp, but σS dissociates completely by 1290 bp, whereas high levels of β′ are found downstream. In the presence of rifampicin, holoenzyme is immobilized at the promoter. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Association of σ32, σ70, and β′ with the Transcribed Regions of rrn and htpG The data at specific times after a temperature shift from 37° to 45°C are shown. (A) Eσ at the rrn operon. At 5 min after heat shock, Eσ70 and RNAP levels decrease, whereas the levels of Eσ32 increase. By 10 min, Eσ70 levels begin to recover whereas σ32 occupancy decreases. By 20 min, the levels of Eσ70 approach exponential-phase growth values. (B) Eσ at the htpG gene. At 0 min, a measurable amount of Eσ32 is at the promoter. 5 min after heat shock, Eσ32 and RNAP are bound at the htpG operon. The occupancy of σ32 declines by 10 min, but RNAP (β′) levels within the gene remain high. The levels decline further by 20 min. σ70 levels remain at background levels at this gene. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Association of σ54 and β′ with rrn and with the glnAP2 Promoter σ54 is not detected at the rrn operons in noninducing conditions. The levels of Eσ54 at the nitrogen assimilation gene glnA in log phase in the presence and absence of rifampicin are shown. Both σ54 and β′ are present at the glnA promoter, but not in the gene. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Conserved Domain Structure of E. coli σ Factors and a Model for σ-Release (A) The conserved domains of σ (regions 1, 2, 3, and 4) are indicated by colored boxes. σ70, σS, and σ32 are all part of the σ70 family with homologous amino acid sequences. σ54 displays poor sequence similarity to the other σ factors. σ70-type of σ factors likely utilize conserved interfaces to associate with the core RNAP as well as with the promoter (regions 2.4 and 4.2). (B) Model of stochastic σ release. The structural model of holoenzyme (holo) and the elongating core (core) is from Darst and coworkers (Murakami et al., 2002). The domains of σ are colored as in (A) (only the crystallized portion of region 1 is in orange), and core RNAP is in gray. In the first step of σ release, the linker between σ region-3 and -4 (blue) is displaced from the RNA exit tunnel in the core by the nascent RNA transcript. Next, interactions between σ region 4 (red) and the β-flap are disrupted by the 15–16 nt transcript (>11 nt). The remaining interactions primarily occur between σ regions 2 plus region 3 (green) and RNAP, and σ factors dissociate from this complex in a stochastic manner. Molecular Cell 2005 20, 357-366DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2005.10.011) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions