Reversible pulmonary trunk banding: VII

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Advertisements

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

T.K. Susheel Kumar, MD, Christopher J. Knott-Craig, MD

A meta-analysis of comparative studies of endovascular versus open repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury Hisato Takagi, MD, PhD, Norikazu Kawai, MD,

Expanding options to manage traumatic thoracic vascular injuries

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding

Reversible Pulmonary Trunk Banding VIII: Intermittent Overload Causes Harmless Hypertrophy in Adult Goat Leonardo A. Miana, MD, PhD, Renato S. Assad,

Building a bioartificial heart: A 3-song saga

Personalized cardiac surgery: Can noninvasive flow imaging lead to individualized resection strategies for bicuspid aortopathy? Nicholas D. Andersen,

Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding III: Assessment of myocardial adaptive mechanisms—contribution of cell proliferation Maria C.D. Abduch, DVM, PhD,

Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky? Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Form ever follows function

Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD

William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD

Hassane Abdallah, MD, Alaae Boutayeb, MD, Gebrine El Khoury, PhD

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

Acute left ventricular failure after bilateral lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension Tom Verbelen, MD, Sophie Van Cromphaut,

Expanding left ventricular assist device use to patients with disabilities: The role of assistive technology Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of.

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

Transection with pseudoaneurysm formation of the pulmonary trunk after placement of an adjustable pulmonary artery banding device (FloWatch-PAB) in a.

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery Vinay Badhwar, MD The Journal of Thoracic and.

It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…

Military surgeons just want to have fun

A first start for lung transplantation?

Right ventricular failure after cardiac surgery: Why can't right ventricular assist device support fix the problem? Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD The Journal.

Bilal H. Kirmani, MRCS, Christopher M

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

Living without lungs? Bilateral pneumonectomy and dual circulatory support: A step forward in the search for a total artificial lung Christian A. Bermudez,

Leora B. Balsam, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD

Niv Ad, MD, Lawrence M. Wei, MD

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding. II

Is endoluminal vacuum therapy “sponge worthy”?

Frozen elephant trunk technique: Ready to get back to the future?

Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery

Marc Licker, MD, John Diaper, RA

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Preoperative and intraoperative variables to predict mortality: Which comes first, the chicken or the egg? Umberto Benedetto, MD, PhD, Gianni D. Angelini,

Commentary: Do the right thing! Ethical versus legal

Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding with a balloon catheter

Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Shunt right or left? Decision 2016

First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids

The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956 Richard A. DeWall, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Constantine L. Athanasuleas, MD, FACC

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Ventricular assistant in restrictive cardiomyopathy: Making the right connection Robert D.B. Jaquiss, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China

When should the elephant (frozen elephant trunk) enter the room (aorta)? Frank A. Baciewicz, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume.

After neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, predicted pulmonary function may be reduced by 10% Benny Weksler, MD, MBA The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out Glen B. Taksler, PhD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Ryan R. Davies, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Apples remain apples NO matter what

Respect the aorta The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind

Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2

Journal changes and initiatives

Edward Y. Chan, MD, Michael J. Reardon, MD

Right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot Heiner Latus, MD, Wolfhard Binder, MD, Gunter Kerst, MD,

Deciding how much to pay for effective care

Presentation transcript:

Reversible pulmonary trunk banding: VII Reversible pulmonary trunk banding: VII. Stress echocardiographic assessment of rapid ventricular hypertrophy in young goats Gustavo A.G. Fávaro, MD, PhD, Renato S. Assad, MD, PhD, Maria C.D. Abduch, VMD, PhD, Gustavo J.J. Silva, PE, PhD, Guilherme S. Gomes, MD, José L. Andrade, MD, PhD, José E. Krieger, MD, PhD, Luiz Felipe P. Moreira, MD, PhD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages 1345-1351.e4 (May 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068 Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups, under dobutamine stress. A, Resting condition (∗P < .03 compared with that in sham group at measurement point) and, B, dobutamine stress (∗P < .03 compared with that in sham group at measurement point). †P = .032 compared with that in intermittent group at measurement point. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Right ventricular myocardial performance index (RVMPI) of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups, under dobutamine stress. A, Resting condition (†P = .012 compared with that in intermittent group at measurement point) and, B, dobutamine stress (∗P = .002 compared with baseline value; †P < .001 compared with that in intermittent and sham groups at measurement point). The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E1 Right ventricular (RV) thickness changes in sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout protocol. †P < .001 compared with that of sham group; ∗P < .001 compared with respective baseline value; and ‡P = .015 compared with that in continuous group at same measurement point. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E2 Right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume changes in sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout protocol. †P < .03 compared with that of sham group; ∗P = .028 compared with its respective preoperative (Preop) value. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E3 Right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction changes (%) of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout protocol, under resting conditions. †P < .029 compared with that in intermittent group at same measurement point; ∗P < .002 compared with its respective preoperative (Preop) value; and ‡P = .006 compared with that in sham group at same measurement point. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure E4 Right ventricular (RV) myocardial performance index changes (%) of sham, continuous, and intermittent groups throughout protocol, under resting conditions. ¤P < .04 compared with that in sham group at same measurement point; and #P < .001 compared with that in intermittent group at same measurement point. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2013 145, 1345-1351.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.068) Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions