Charge for the LCLS Undulator Magnet Review Committee: Nov. 14th, 2003

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan Dr. M.M. Awais- Computer Science Department Lecture 2 Development Life Cycle of ES.
Advertisements

DT Coursework By D. Henwood.
GSCE Product Design, Controlled Assessment task (evaluation)
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Follow-Up Review of the APUL Project November 2-3, 2009 Dean A. Hoffer.
Selecting a suitable problem for A2 coursework. Criterion 1 Mark Band – Context and Objectives Context and Objectives 5 Detailed and perceptive understanding.
 Dr. Syed Noman Hasany.  Review of known methodologies  Analysis of software requirements  Real-time software  Software cost, quality, testing and.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
October 12, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Undulator Good Field Region and Tuning Strategy 1 Undulator Good Field Region and.
Upstream PID Review Alan Bross MICE CM 16 October 12, 2006.
LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 LCLS schematic view LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review.
Undulator System Review Closeout Erik Johnson, Kem Robinson, Dieter Walz 4 March 2004.
LCLS Undulator Systems TDR Charge Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technical Review, March 3, 2004.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Atomic Structure.
Core Competenc y #7 Jaleesia Fullwood. 7.1 Practical Behaviors: Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and.
1. Human – the end-user of a program – the others in the organization Computer – the machine the program runs on – often split between clients & servers.
BSBIMN501A QUEENSLAND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ACADEMY.
Chapter 4 Components of the Software Quality Assurance System
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
Improving People’s Lives.  Technology – is the use of science to solve problems and make people’s lives easier  Engineer – person who designs, constructs,
Product Documentation Chapter 5. Required Medical Device Documentation  Business proposal  Product specification  Design specification  Software.
Social Change Diffusion of Innovations Source: Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition. NY: Free Press.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Louis Gross, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee Thoughts on Raccoon Rabies Models.
Executive Session Director’s Progress Review of the NOvA Project August 4-5, 2010 Dean A. Hoffer.
© 2010 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Experian Public. 1 Optimization can help your organization solve complex business objectives.
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Decision-Support-System for the Rehabilitation of Buildings: The MEMSCON Project RISA Sicherheitsanalysen GmbH Berlin 1st MEMSCON Event - 07 October 2010,
Code Governance Review: follow up. 2 Background CGR implementation PID included the following deliverable –“achieve a demonstrable cultural shift within.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
 Dr. Syed Noman Hasany.  Review of known methodologies  Analysis of software requirements  Real-time software  Software cost, quality, testing and.
Zoe Jones Social Care Transformation Project Manager The Care Act.
Oprah’s Summary 1 st Part (About video) – Summary about the videos – Favorite parts, etc. 2 nd Part (About you) – What are you doing now that is Money.
Procurement and Manufacture of LCLS Undulators FY 04 Activity: Complete design of Second Prototype Undulator This will include field control comb Procure.
PLANT LAYOUT. Definitions In the words of James Lundy, 'Plant layout identically involves the allocation of space and the arrangement of equipments in.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
December 13, G raphical A symmetric P rocessing Prototype Presentation December 13, 2004.
 (Worse) How to adjust multiple settings of the process parameters was outside of the knowledge of the engineers.  (Better) The engineers did not know.
Proposed LCLS-II SCU Schedule Soren Prestemon (LBNL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Understanding HR Objectives and Strategies. Learning Objectives To understand the activities involved in human resource management. To understand the.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Closing Session Report
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
PLANNING, MATERIALITY AND ASSESSING THE RISK OF MISSTATEMENT
Next Step & Time plan Marcello Losasso, CERN
Business Strategy versus Product Strategy A case Study
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
interactive knowledge centre
Robert Karas and Frank McCloskey
Presentation Title Sector First Last, Senior Analyst
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
Undulator Assembly Procedure
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
MKKK 1653 SAFETY AND HEALTH IN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES
Control Hardware & Status
RISK MANAGEMENT MARKET & SOCIAL RESEARCH
Professional Development
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
Undulator Cost & Schedule Patric Den Hartog, ANL April 24, 2002
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
Endstation Systems, Installation Costs and Schedule J. Hastings
AQA GCE Business Studies
WHS Bell Schedule 1st Period  7:30 – 8:30 2nd Period  8:35 – 9:30
Defined benefit financial management
Undulators Subgroup Summary April FAC Review K. Robinson, J
DiRAC Technical Application
Presentation transcript:

Charge for the LCLS Undulator Magnet Review Committee: Nov. 14th, 2003 Review the overall design and design/engineering decisions/solutions used for the 1st prototype undulator magnet and comment on the appropriateness of these decisions with respect to minimizing risk in meeting LCLS performance specifications. In particular, is this a robust design capable of being mass produced. Assess the overall quality and appropriateness of the measurements and tuning methods. In particular, has a suitable set of measurements been carried out on the 1st prototype to prove that it has achieved the required specifications without undue difficulty in manufacturing, and has this design been proven to be sufficiently stable over time? Based on the knowledge gained from the 1st prototype have the appropriate design modifications been made and, in your opinion, will they be successful in a mass produced device? The 2nd prototype will be constructed in a manner similar to the acquisition plan for the production run. I would like your comments on the acquisition plan and schedule for the 2nd prototype and the production magnets.