A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IP3 Receptor Activity Is Differentially Regulated in Endoplasmic Reticulum Subdomains during Oocyte Maturation  Michael J. Boulware, Jonathan S. Marchant 
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Shuhei Yoshida, Masako Kaido, Tomoya S. Kitajima  Developmental Cell 
Germán Sumbre, Graziano Fiorito, Tamar Flash, Binyamin Hochner 
Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Janet H. Iwasa, R. Dyche Mullins  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Bulk Cytoplasmic Actin and Its Functions in Meiosis and Mitosis
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages e8 (August 2017)
Martin Bringmann, Dominique C. Bergmann  Current Biology 
Spindle Positioning: Actin Mediates Pushing and Pulling
And the Dead Shall Rise: Actin and Myosin Return to the Spindle
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms Coassemble in Living Cells
Asymmetric Positioning and Organization of the Meiotic Spindle of Mouse Oocytes Requires CDC42 Function  Jie Na, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz  Current Biology 
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
The Origin of Phragmoplast Asymmetry
Control of Local Rho GTPase Crosstalk by Abr
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 112, Issue 6, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
She1-Mediated Inhibition of Dynein Motility along Astral Microtubules Promotes Polarized Spindle Movements  Steven M. Markus, Katelyn A. Kalutkiewicz,
Guillaume Halet, John Carroll  Developmental Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
IP3 Receptor Activity Is Differentially Regulated in Endoplasmic Reticulum Subdomains during Oocyte Maturation  Michael J. Boulware, Jonathan S. Marchant 
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
KIF4 Regulates Midzone Length during Cytokinesis
Control of Centriole Length by CPAP and CP110
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages (September 2010)
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Integration of Single and Multicellular Wound Responses
Anaphase B Precedes Anaphase A in the Mouse Egg
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Spatial Regulation of Kinetochore Microtubule Attachments by Destabilization at Spindle Poles in Meiosis I  Lukáš Chmátal, Karren Yang, Richard M. Schultz,
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Hui-Fang Hung, Heidi Hehnly, Stephen Doxsey  Current Biology 
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
Presentation transcript:

A New Model for Asymmetric Spindle Positioning in Mouse Oocytes Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 24, Pages 1986-1992 (December 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.022 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Fmn2 Nucleates a Dynamic Cytoplasmic Actin Network (A) Oocytes were fixed at indicated stages after isolation and stained with Alexa-488-phalloidin to label F-actin (green) and with Hoechst to label chromosomes (red). Boxed regions are magnified in the second row. (B) Cytoplasmic F-actin dynamics in an oocyte expressing EGFP-UtrCH (F-actin). Colored arrowheads highlight the relative positions of five actin nodes. Tracks are superimposed on last image. Circles mark initial positions. (C) Live Fmn2+/+ (top image) or Fmn2−/− (bottom image) oocytes expressing EGFP-UtrCH (green) and H2B-mRFP1 (red) imaged via confocal microscopy. Boxed regions are magnified in inset. For the diagram, Fmn2+/− (black bars; n = 27) and Fmn2−/− (red bars; n = 60) oocytes were scored for the presence of cytoplasmic actin filaments. (D) Fmn2−/− oocyte expressing Fmn2-mCherry (top image) or Fmn2−/− oocyte (bottom image) fixed 6 hr after induction of maturation. F-actin staining (Alexa-488-phalloidin) is shown in green and chromosomes (Hoechst) in red. Boxed regions are magnified in inset. For the diagram, Fmn2−/− oocytes expressing Fmn2-mCherry (black bars; n = 19) and Fmn2−/− oocytes (red bars; n = 14) were scored for the presence of cytoplasmic actin filaments. (E) Live Fmn2−/− oocyte expressing Fmn2-mCherry (top image) and Fmn2−/− (bottom image) oocyte stained with Hoechst to label chromosomes (red) 12 hr after induction of maturation. For the diagram, Fmn2−/− oocytes expressing Fmn2-mCherry (black bars; n = 15) and Fmn2−/− oocytes (red bars; n = 33) were scored for the presence of a polar body 12 hr after induction of maturation. Polar bodies were slightly larger after rescue, as also described for the rescue with Fmn2-EGFP previously [6]. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1986-1992DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Spindle Poles Pull on the Actin Network during Relocation (A) Live oocyte expressing EGFP-MAP4 (red, microtubules) that has been injected with a low dose of TMR-phalloidin to label F-actin (green). White ovals mark initial spindle positions. Boxed region is magnified in the second row. Time hr:min. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (B) Live oocyte expressing EGFP-UtrCH (F-actin). Boxed regions of proximal pole (top row) and distal pole (bottom row) are magnified next to overview. Colored arrowheads highlight relative positions of actin nodes. Tracks are superimposed on last images. Circles mark initial positions. Scale bars in overview represent 10 μm; in magnification, 3 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1986-1992DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Activated Myosin-2 Accumulates at Spindle Poles and Its Activator MLCK Is Required for Spindle Relocation (A) Immunofluorescence of oocytes stained for pMLC2 (green) and DNA (red). The presence of pMLC2 at one or both spindle poles was scored in 26 oocytes. The oocyte in the right panel was treated with 30 μM ML-7. Boxed regions are magnified in second (red box) and third (white box) images. White circles mark oocyte rim. Scale bar represents 10 μm. (B) Live oocyte expressing EGFP-UtrCH (green, F-actin) and H2B-mRFP (red, chromosomes) before (top row) and after (bottom row) addition of 15 μM ML-7. The EGFP-UtrCH signal in the boxed region is magnified next to the overviews. Colored arrowheads highlight relative positions of actin nodes. Tracks are superimposed on last images. Circles mark initial positions. Scale bars in overview represent 10 μm; in magnification, 3 μm. (C) Actin nodes were tracked as in (B), and their velocity toward (positive) or away from (negative) the spindle pole along the spindle axis was determined before and after addition of 15 μM ML-7. Averages and standard deviation from 6 oocytes (132 tracks) are shown. (D) Spindle relocation in a live oocyte expressing EGFP-MAP4 (red, microtubules, merged with DIC) after addition of 15 μM ML-7 (top row) or DMSO (bottom row) after relocation onset. White ovals mark initial spindle positions. Time hr:min. Scale bars represent 10 μm. (E) The spindle was tracked in DMSO (black curve; v = 0.11 ± 0.03 μm/min; n = 7) or 15 μM ML-7-treated oocytes (red curve; v = 0.03 ± 0.02 μm/min; n = 7; p < 10−4) in 3D data sets (11 sections, every 7 μm) as shown in (D). Both curves represent averages and standard deviations from 7 oocytes. Current Biology 2008 18, 1986-1992DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A New Model for Spindle Relocation (A) Mechanistic model for spindle relocation in mouse oocytes. The different objects are specified in the legend. For details, see text. (B) Statistical analysis of the direction of spindle relocation (arrows) relative to the spindle axis. (C) Statistical analysis of the direction of spindle relocation (arrows) relative to the oocyte center (cross). (D) Statistical analysis of the direction of spindle relocation after shifting the spindle from the old position (dashed oval) into the opposite half of the oocyte (filled oval) by using a microneedle. A representative example is shown in (G). (E) The delay between bipolar spindle formation and the onset of spindle relocation was measured in 27 oocytes and plotted against the ratio between the distance of the two spindle poles to the proximal and the distal cortex. The ratio is 1 if the spindle forms exactly in the center of the oocyte. (F) The spindle velocity at different distances to the position where the spindle slows down because arrival at the cortex was calculated from Figure S7B. (G) Spindle relocation in live oocytes expressing EGFP-MAP4 (red, microtubules, merged with DIC). The white dashed oval marks the initial spindle position. After the spindle had started to relocate to the closest cortical position, it was shifted into the opposite half of the oocyte by a microneedle. The position of the spindle after the shift is marked by the white continuous oval. The distances to the cortex before and after shifting the spindle are specified. The arrows indicate the direction of relocation before and after spindle shift. Time hr:min. Scale bars represent 10 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 1986-1992DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.022) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions