Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 
Advertisements

Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Nestor O Concha, Beth A Rasmussen, Karen Bush, Osnat Herzberg 
Structural Basis of Integrin Activation by Talin
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Danny N.P Doan, Terje Dokland  Structure 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Crystal Structure of the TAO2 Kinase Domain
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
Structural Basis for FGF Receptor Dimerization and Activation
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP  Birgitte H Kallipolitis, Mads Nørregaard-Madsen,
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin Begoña Garcı́a-Alvarez, José M de Pereda, David A Calderwood, Tobias S Ulmer, David Critchley, Iain D Campbell, Mark H Ginsberg, Robert C Liddington  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 49-58 (January 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7

Figure 1 Structure of the F2+F3 Domain of Talin (A) Domain organization and functional sites of full-length talin. A calpain II cleavage site separates the head and tail domains. The three subdomains of the classical FERM domain are represented by white, blue, and red boxes. Functional assignments are indicated by horizontal bars. (B) Stereo ribbon representation of the F2+F3 structure, with secondary structure indicated. Figures were generated using the programs MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991), RASTER3D (Merritt and Murphy, 1994), SPOCK (Christopher, 1998), or BOBSCRIPT (Esnouf, 1997). (C) Structure-based sequence alignment of the F2+F3 region of talin with the human FERM proteins moesin (SwissProt accession number P26038), radixin (P35241), merlin (P35240), band 4.1 (P11171), and Focal Adhesion Kinase; and the PTB domains of X11 (Q02410) and IRS-1 (P35568). The large insertions in the β1-β2 and β6-β7 loops of X11 are not shown, and are represented by dots. The secondary structure elements of talin are indicated: α helices and 310 helices as rectangles, and β strands as arrows. Residues directly participating in β3 integrin binding to talin are indicated by boxes, and mutations that are critical for integrin binding are marked in red. (D) Stereo representation of the F3 domain (Cα), showing the invading N-terminal arm (all atom) from a neighboring molecule in the crystal lattice. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 49-58DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7)

Figure 2 Structural Studies of Talin-Integrin Binding (A) Ratio of 2D NMR 1H-15N signal intensities of the full-length β3 tail, fused to a coiled-coil construct, in the absence, I0, and presence, I, of F2+F3. Pronounced reductions in peak intensity in the presence of F2+F3, i.e., low I/I0 ratios were observed for some residues, indicating a perturbation of the associated amino acid residue by the interaction with F2+F3. The absence of reductions of peak intensity within the coiled-coil region (residues 3–39) confirms the specificity of the interactions. The most strongly affected regions in the vicinity of the NPxY motif are boxed, and the inset shows aligned sequences of β integrins and layilin (Lay1 and Lay2). The residue in position −8 of integrins (−6 in layilin) is in a blue box, while the NPXY motif is in a yellow box. The observed effects are strongly dependent on the integrity of the NPxY motif, as demonstrated by the abolition of these effects by the Y747A substitution. The significance of the spectral changes observed in the membrane proximal region is unclear. (B) Surface representation of the F3 subdomain of talin, colored by electrostatic potential (blue for positive charge and red for negative). The β3 integrin ligand, residues 738–747, is shown as sticks. Integrin residues are labeled in green, while residues of talin are labeled on the surface. (C) Stereo close-up of the integrin-talin interaction as observed in the β3(739-749)-talin chimera; the talin backbone is in gray, integrin in yellow. Residue numbers are those for authentic talin (gray) and integrin (green) sequences. For the latter, numbers in parenthesis refer to the position with respect to the NPLY tyrosine. There are no significant differences with β3(739-749)-talin. The main chain of one residue derived from the construct upstream of W739 is also shown, as it has good electron density in all of the chimeras. A partially buried water molecule is indicated with (ω) and key H bonds with dotted lines. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 49-58DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7)

Figure 3 Comparison of FERM F3 and PTB Domain Interactions Stereo Cα plot comparing the F3 subdomain of talin and the integrin sequence (red), the F3 subdomain of moesin and the β strand of the C-terminal tail (green), and the PTB domain of X11 with the β-APP bound (blue). The structures were superposed by aligning the Cα atoms of 39 residues in the β sandwich. The ligands are shown as thick lines. The tyrosine sidechains of the NPxY motifs of integrin and β-APP are also shown. For clarity, insertions in the X11 structure absent in FERM domains are not shown. Residue numbering is for talin. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 49-58DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7)

Figure 4 Structure-Based Mutagenesis of the Talin At left, binding of talin mutants to full-length β3 tail. Recombinant F2+F3 containing the indicated mutation was incubated with the integrin β3 cytoplasmic domain model protein; following washing, the bound protein was detected by SDS-PAGE. Note the absence of binding to β3(Y747A) and αIIb cytoplasmic domain model proteins and the equal loading (rightmost column) of each mutant. The bottom row depicts the equal loading of each model tail protein as judged by SDS-PAGE. At right, residues mutated in this study are mapped onto the surface of the talin F3 domain, with hydrophobic residues colored yellow. The K357A mutation (green) does not affect binding, while alanine substitution of R358, W359, and I396 (red) reduce binding. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 49-58DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00823-7)