Patrick Wigge, Yvonne Vallis, Harvey T. McMahon  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
The Cool-2/α-Pix Protein Mediates a Cdc42-Rac Signaling Cascade
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Federico Dajas-Bailador, Emma V. Jones, Alan J. Whitmarsh 
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
RhoGDI Is Required for Cdc42-Mediated Cellular Transformation
Volume 126, Issue 7, Pages (June 2004)
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages (July 1998)
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (May 1998)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Volume 18, Issue 22, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Gap junction protein connexin-43 interacts directly with microtubules
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Stefanie S. Schalm, Diane C. Fingar, David M. Sabatini, John Blenis 
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Ligand-Independent Recruitment of SRC-1 to Estrogen Receptor β through Phosphorylation of Activation Function AF-1  André Tremblay, Gilles B Tremblay,
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Interaction of Cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 Complex
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Jorge A. Garces, Imran B. Clark, David I. Meyer, Richard B. Vallee 
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
Cyclin G Recruits PP2A to Dephosphorylate Mdm2
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Regulation of protein kinase C ζ by PI 3-kinase and PDK-1
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages S1-S2 (August 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
LGN Blocks the Ability of NuMA to Bind and Stabilize Microtubules
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 15, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages (October 2001)
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Grb2 Is a Key Mediator of Helicobacter pylori CagA Protein Activities
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
N-Terminal Palmitoylation of PSD-95 Regulates Association with Cell Membranes and Interaction with K+ Channel Kv1.4  J.Rick Topinka, David S Bredt  Neuron 
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Import and export of the nuclear protein import receptor transportin by a mechanism independent of GTP hydrolysis  Sara Nakielny, Gideon Dreyfuss  Current.
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
RRC1 Interacts with phyB and Colocalizes in Nuclear Photobodies.
Presentation transcript:

Inhibition of receptor-mediated endocytosis by the amphiphysin SH3 domain  Patrick Wigge, Yvonne Vallis, Harvey T. McMahon  Current Biology  Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 554-560 (August 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00254-5

Figure 1 (a) Amphiphysin interacts with α-adaptin and dynamin via separable, non-overlapping domains. Full-length amphiphysin (Amph), the amino-terminal domain (AmphAB) or the carboxy-terminal domain (Amph-SH3) were expressed as glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins, and incubated with 10 mg rat brain extract. Bound proteins were subjected to 7% SDS–PAGE and detected by immunoblotting. A schematic view of amphiphysin (1–683 amino acids) and the constructs used in these studies is also shown. The domains are as follows: A, predicted α-helical region (amino acids 1–131); B, proline-rich region (132–342); C, acidic domain (343–605); D, SH3 domain (606–683). (b) Amphiphysin can efficiently recruit dynamin to the ear domain of α-adaptin in vitro. GST–α-adaptin ear domain was incubated with extracts of COS cells overexpressing either amphiphysin or dynamin, or both, as shown, and bound proteins were analysed by immunoblotting with polyclonal antibodies to amphiphysin (Ra3 antibody) and dynamin. The lane labelled ‘Total’ contains extracts from COS-7 cells overexpressing either amphiphysin or dynamin. (c) Amphiphysin is expressed in COS cells and other peripheral tissues. Extracts were prepared from each tissue in buffer A (see Materials and methods) containing 1% TX-100 and assayed by Bradford protein detection. Equal amounts of protein (50 μg, except 150 μg COS extract) were subjected to SDS–PAGE followed by immunoblotting for amphiphysin (Ra4.2 antibody), clathrin, dynamin (monoclonal antibody) or the transferrin receptor (Transferrin-R) as a measure of protein loading). Note that the Ra4.2 and the dynamin monoclonal antibodies (Transduction Laboratories) detect low levels of expression of amphiphysin and dynamin, respectively, in other tissues compared with expression levels in the brain. The bar chart shows the quantitation of the tissue distribution of amphiphysin from three experiments normalised to protein concentration (± standard deviation). The enrichment of amphiphysin in all five tissues by the GST–α-adaptin ear domain is shown below the bar chart. (d) The amphiphysin SH3 domain binds specifically to dynamin in COS cells. GST-tagged SH3 domain, or GST (both immobilised on glutathione–agarose) were incubated with extract from either brain or COS cells (both at 10 mg/ml), in buffer A containing 1% TX-100. The bound proteins were analysed by Coomassie staining (upper panel) or immunoblotting with a DynI/II monoclonal antibody (lower panel). Several major proteins are bound nonspecifically by GST, but the 96 kDa dynamin band is precipitated only by GST–Amp-SH3. This comigrates with dynamin present in total COS or brain extracts. Also shown are total COS cell and brain extracts, and total recombinant GST and GST–Amph-SH3 proteins (10 μg of each) before incubation with dynamin extracts. Current Biology 1997 7, 554-560DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00254-5)

Figure 2 The amphiphysin SH3 domain inhibits transferrin uptake in COS cells. Cells were transfected by the DEAE-dextran method as described in Materials and methods with pCMV constructs of (a) the SH3 domain of amphiphysin (Amph-SH3), (b) Amph-SH3 and dynamin, (c) dynamin alone, (d) the aminoterminal SH3 domain of Grb2 (Grb2-NSH3) and (e) the SH3 domain of spectrin (Spec-SH3). Cells were subsequently visualised for the uptake of biotin-labelled transferrin by confocal microscopy. The bar in (e) represents 10 μM. Current Biology 1997 7, 554-560DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00254-5)

Figure 3 Binding of dynamin to SH3 domains. Recombinant SH3 domains were purified on glutathione–agarose beads. After incubation with 3 μg purified dynamin, bound dynamin was visualised by Coomassie staining following SDS–PAGE. Current Biology 1997 7, 554-560DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00254-5)

Figure 4 Specificity and quantitation of the endocytic blockade by the amphiphysin SH3 domain. (a) The effect of the amphiphysin SH3 domain on EGF uptake (see Materials and methods). (b) Rescue of the amphiphysin SH3-domain-mediated endocytic blockade by dynamin cotransfection. For (a,b), labelled EGF was incubated with the transfected cells for 5 min before washing and fixing as described in Materials and methods. The bar represents 10 μM. (c) Quantitation of the inhibition of transferrin and EGF uptake, and their rescue by dynamin. For each transfection experiment, polygons were drawn around 20 transfected cells and 20 untransfected control cells and the number of green pixels counted in each, normalised for area and expressed as a percentage of the untransfected control. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. (d) Disruption of the amphiphysin SH3 domain–dynamin interaction does not affect fluid-phase uptake. COS cells transfected with the Myc-tagged amphiphysin SH3 domain (red) were incubated with FITC-labelled lysine-fixable dextran (green) for 60 min before fixing the cells. Transfected cells were identified by labelling with the anti-Myc antibody. Uptake of FITC–dextran into a number of untransfected cells is also visible in this same panel. Current Biology 1997 7, 554-560DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00254-5)