DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Advertisements

Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Control of Cdc28 CDK1 by a Stress-Induced lncRNA
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
A Major Epigenetic Programming Mechanism Guided by piRNAs
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
The Activation Potential of MOF Is Constrained for Dosage Compensation
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Johnathan Labbadia, Richard I. Morimoto  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
R. Thomas Koerber, Ho Sung Rhee, Cizhong Jiang, B. Franklin Pugh 
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Barrier Function at HMR
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (January 2014)
STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated NK cells. STAT4 facilitates a permissive epigenetic landscape (H3K4me3) in activated.
Enhancer RNA Facilitates NELF Release from Immediate Early Genes
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
A Role for Mammalian Sin3 in Permanent Gene Silencing
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages e3 (March 2019)
Presentation transcript:

DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme Adam N. Yadon, Badri Nath Singh, Michael Hampsey, Toshio Tsukiyama  Molecular Cell  Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 93-103 (April 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ume6, Nrg1, Cin5, and Sok2 May Target Isw2 by Unknown Mechanisms (A–D) Isw2 ChIP signals in TF mutant strains. TF-dependent Isw2 targets were aligned by their midpoint and the average log2 Isw2 ChIP signal in WT (solid lines) or TF null mutants (dashed lines) is displayed across 6,000 bp. Regions containing an annotated binding site are displayed in blue and regions without an annotated binding site displayed in red. The numbers in parentheses denote the number of loci analyzed. Shown are (A) Δume6 versus WT, (B) Δnrg1 versus WT, (C) Δcin5 versus WT, and (D) Δsok2 versus WT. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Evidence for DNA Looping-Dependent Targeting of Isw2 (A) Venn diagram displaying the statistically significant overrepresentation of Isw2 targets that are located at both the 5′ and 3′ ends of the same genes. The p value was calculated with a hypergeometric distribution using nondubious genes only. (B–D) Isw2 and Ume6 binding at Isw2 targets. The average log2 Isw2 ChIP signals for WT (black), Δume6 (red), and sua7-1 (orange) strains (average log2 ratio, Isw2 ChIP), and the average log2 Ume6 ChIP signals for WT (black) strains (average log2 ratio, Ume6 ChIP) are displayed. Red and orange boxes in Significant Regions indicate regions having significantly different Isw2 ChIP signal between WT and Δume6 or sua7-1 strains, respectively. Nondubious genes are displayed as black (Watson strand) and gray (Crick strand) boxes in Genomic Features. Loss of Isw2 ChIP enrichment is highlighted by arrows (red, Ume6 binding sites; black, no Ume6 binding site). (B) ChrXIII: 300,500–314,500, (C) ChrI: 30,000–50,000, (D) ChrVII: 602,000–632,000. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ume6- and TFIIB-Dependent Isw2 Targets Extensively Overlap (A) Venn diagram displaying the number of UME6- and SUA7-dependent Isw2 target regions that directly overlap (“Ectopic”). The p value was calculated using a hypergeometric distribution. (B) Isw2 and Ume6 ChIP signals around Ume6-dependent Isw2 targets. The average log2 ChIP signals of Isw2 in WT, Δume6, and sua7-1 strains, as well as the average log2 ChIP signals of Ume6 in WT strains, are displayed for a 3,000 bp window centered around the midpoint of the targets. Canonical and ectopic Isw2 targets are marked on the right. Targets that directly overlap with Isw2-dependent chromatin remodeling (Whitehouse et al., 2007) are denoted on the far right. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DNA Loops Are Formed between Canonical and Ectopic Isw2 Targets in WT Strains (A–C) The 3C assay between canonical and ectopic Isw2 targets: SPO20-YMR018W (A); BDH1-ACS1 (B); and ERG25-YGR067C (C). Schematic diagrams of each locus analyzed by 3C are displayed at the top of each panel. Watson and Crick genes are displayed as black and gray boxes, respectively. Ectopic Isw2 targets and Ume6 binding sites are marked in red. Red arrowheads depict primer locations and directionality. Dashed vertical lines depict MspI restriction sites used in the 3C assay. Double-headed, dashed arrows indicate looping between canonical and ectopic Isw2 targets. Ethidium bromide staining of 3C and control PCR products is displayed. 3C signals were normalized to the corresponding primer pair control PCR signals. The asterisk indicates a nonspecific band and was not included in the quantitation. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 DNA Looping between Canonical and Ectopic Isw2 Targets Is Dependent on TFIIB and Ume6 (A–F) 3C assay between Isw2 targets in TF and Isw2-K215R mutants: (A–C) WT and sua7-1 strains; (D–F) WT, Δume6, and Isw2-K215R strains; (A and D) SPO20-YMR018W locus; (B and E) BDH1-ACS1 locus; and (C and F) ERG25-YGR067C locus. 3C PCR products (top) and quantitation (bottom) at the canonical and ectopic sites of the indicated loci are shown. Error bars represent the SEM of three independent experiments. See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ume6-Dependent DNA Looping Is Associated with Transcriptional Repression (A) Heat maps showing the fold transcriptional derepression (Fazzio et al., 2001) of Δume6 mutation at Isw2 target genes. Canonical (n = 46) and ectopic (n = 232) Isw2 target genes are aligned according to the fold derepression. Gene derepressed ≥ 1.7-fold (Fazzio et al., 2001) are denoted by black bars. (B) A table showing the top five most highly derepressed canonical or ectopic Isw2 target genes. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Schematic Representation of Major Targeting Mechanisms of Isw2 Isw2 is targeted to canonical sites via physical interactions with Ume6. In contrast, Isw2 is targeted to ectopic sites via Ume6- and TFIIB-dependent DNA looping. A light-blue oval represents the transcription preinitiation complex. Molecular Cell 2013 50, 93-103DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions