Pharmacodynamic Monitoring Predicts Outcomes of CCR5 Blockade as Graft-versus- Host Disease Prophylaxis  Austin P. Huffman, Lee P. Richman, Lisa Crisalli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topical Ruxolitinib Protects LGR5+ Stem Cells in the Hair Follicle and Ameliorates Skin Graft-Versus-Host Disease  Shuichiro Takahashi, MD, Daigo Hashimoto,
Advertisements

Stephanie J. Lee, Loretta A. Williams 
Thrombotic Microangiopathy Associated with Sirolimus Level after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Tacrolimus/Sirolimus-Based Graft-versus-Host.
Mismatch on Glutathione S-Transferase T1 Increases the Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Mortality after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation  María.
Phase 1 Study of Maraviroc As Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatrics  Pooja Khandelwal, MD, Tsuyoshi Fukuda, PhD, Ashley Teusink, PharmD,
Early Hyperglycemia after Initiation of Glucocorticoid Therapy Predicts Adverse Outcome in Patients with Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease  Melanie N. Stauber,
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Severity of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Matched Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow.
A Survival Benefit for Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Transplants from Young Unrelated Donors Compared to Older Sibling Donors Depends on the Graft CD8.
Comparison of Two Pretransplant Predictive Models and a Flexible HCT-CI Using Different Cut off Points to Determine Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Risk.
Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Survival after Cord Blood Transplantation for Acute Leukemia: A Comparison of Japanese versus White Populations  Yachiyo.
Single and Multiple Dose MultiStem (Multipotent Adult Progenitor Cell) Therapy Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Myeloablative Allogeneic.
Sympathectomy Protects Denervated Skin from Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Successful Treatment of Severe Acute Intestinal Graft-versus-Host Resistant to Systemic and Topical Steroids with Alemtuzumab  Marc Schnitzler, Jens Hasskarl,
Impact of Donor Type on Outcome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia  Scott R. Solomon, Connie A. Sizemore, Xu Zhang,
Higher Apheresis Blood Volumes Are Associated with a Reduction in Relapse Risk and Improved Survival in Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity Allogeneic.
Human Herpesvirus-6B Reactivation Is a Risk Factor for Grades II to IV Acute Graft- versus-Host Disease after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation:
Sabina Kersting, Leo F. Verdonck 
Phase I Study of Urate Oxidase in the Reduction of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Myeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation  Albert C.
A Genetic Modifier of the Gut Microbiome Influences the Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease and Bacteremia After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation 
Plasma Biomarkers in Graft-versus-Host Disease: A New Era?
Increased Programmed Death-1 Molecule Expression in Cytomegalovirus Disease and Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation 
Stephanie J. Lee, Loretta A. Williams 
Chronic graft-versus-host disease
Impact of Ocular Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease on Quality of Life
Comparison of Cord Blood Transplantation with Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation in Patients Older than Fifty Years  Masatsugu Tanaka, Koichi Miyamura,
Donor-to-Recipient ABO Mismatch Does Not Impact Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Regardless of Graft Source  Sharat Damodar,
Graft Transit Time Has No Effect on Outcome of Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplants Performed in Australia and New Zealand: A Study from the.
Lymphocyte Phenotype during Therapy for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease: A Brief Report from BMT-CTN 0302  Javier Bolaños-Meade, Juan Wu, Brent R. Logan,
Role of the Mycobiome in Human Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease
PRO 140 Monoclonal Antibody to CCR5 Prevents Acute Xenogeneic Graft-versus-Host Disease in NOD-scid IL-2Rynull Mice  Denis R. Burger, Yvonne Parker, Kathryn.
Dynamic Detection of Anti–Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Antibodies but not HLA-DP Loci Mismatches Can Predict Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease and Overall.
Helicobacter pylori Infection and Graft-versus-Host Disease
Marrow Fibrosis as a Risk Factor for Posttransplantation Outcome in Patients with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Multilineage.
Nonmyeloablative Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation to Treat Patients with Poor-Risk, Relapsed, or Refractory Multiple Myeloma  George.
The Expression of Th17-Associated Cytokines in Human Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease  Yuejun Liu, Yifeng Cai, Lan Dai, Guanghua Chen, Xiao Ma, Ying Wang,
A Novel Strategy in Managing Post-Liver Transplant Acute Graft-Versus-Host-Disease: The New Era (T)Rojan Horse  Zeyad Kanaan, MD, William Tse, MD, FACP 
B Cells and Transplantation: An Educational Resource
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Cytomegalovirus Viremia and Gastroenteritis in Patients with Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease  Divaya.
Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide as Sole Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Is Feasible in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.
Paul J. Martin, Terry Furlong, Scott D. Rowley, Steven A
Reconstitution of Natural Killer Cell Receptor Repertoires after Unmanipulated HLA- Mismatched/Haploidentical Blood and Marrow Transplantation: Analyses.
Low Risk of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease and Relapse Associated with T Cell– Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous.
Total Body Irradiation–Based Myeloablative Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Unrelated Donor Transplantation.
Persistence of host dendritic cells after transplantation is associated with graft-versus- host disease  Geoffrey W. Chan, Gullu Gorgun, Kenneth B. Miller,
A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Maraviroc as Acute Graft-versus- Host Disease Prophylaxis in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.
Comparison of Tacrolimus and Sirolimus (Tac/Sir) versus Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Mini-Methotrexate (Tac/Sir/MTX) as Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease.
Possible Association between Obesity and Posttransplantation Complications Including Infectious Diseases and Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease  Shigeo Fuji,
Impact of Donor and Recipient Sex and Parity on Outcomes of HLA-Identical Sibling Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation  Alison W. Loren,
Regression Models for Hazard Rates Versus Cumulative Incidence Probabilities in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Data  Brent R. Logan, Mei-Jie Zhang,
Prediction of Severe Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) in Recipients of HLA Identical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Using Donor Gene Expression.
Salvage Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Fludarabine and Low-Dose Total Body Irradiation after Rejection of First Allografts  Boglarka.
Content Validity of the Lee Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Symptom Scale as Assessed by Cognitive Interviews  Emily C. Merkel, Sandra A. Mitchell,
Heterogeneity in Studies of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells to Treat or Prevent Graft- versus-Host Disease: A Scoping Review of the Evidence  Mina Rizk, Madeline.
Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation after a Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Containing High-Dose Thymoglobulin Leads to Controllable Graft-versus-Host.
John E. Levine, Sophie Paczesny, Stefanie Sarantopoulos 
Blood and Marrow Transplant Handbook
Therapeutic Immunosuppression Concentrations on Day 0 and the Development of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Young Female Donors Do Not Increase the Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease or Impact Overall Outcomes in Pediatric HLA-Matched Sibling Hematopoietic Stem.
Preengraftment Syndrome after Unrelated Cord Blood Transplant Is a Strong Predictor of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease  Haydar Frangoul, Li.
A Bortezomib-Based Regimen Offers Promising Survival and Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Myeloablative HLA-Mismatched and Unrelated Donor Transplantation:
Low Serum Levels of Total Rabbit-IgG Is Associated with Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation:
Mammen Chandy  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 
Treatment versus Transplant for Challenging Hematologic Disorders
Prospective Monitoring of Tumor Necrosis Factor α and Interferon γ to Predict the Onset of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic.
Adult Recipients of Matched Related Donor Blood Cell Transplants Given Myeloablative Regimens Including Pretransplant Antithymocyte Globulin Have Lower.
Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Unrelated Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus,
Mary Eapen  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 
Endothelial Vulnerability and Endothelial Damage Are Associated with Risk of Graft- versus-Host Disease and Response to Steroid Treatment  Sascha Dietrich,
Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Calcineurin Inhibitor–Free Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Umbilical Cord.
Andrew R. Rezvani, Barry E. Storer, Katherine A. Guthrie, H
Presentation transcript:

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring Predicts Outcomes of CCR5 Blockade as Graft-versus- Host Disease Prophylaxis  Austin P. Huffman, Lee P. Richman, Lisa Crisalli, Alex Ganetsky, David L. Porter, Robert H. Vonderheide, Ran Reshef  Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation  Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 594-599 (March 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.028 Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 CCR5 blockade sufficiency can be determined by phosphoflow. (A) Representative flow plot from patient 04712-015 on day –6 pretransplant, before initiation of MVC. CD8 T cell pCCR5 MFI increases in response to CCL4 stimulation and decreases in response to exogenous MVC. (B) Average fold-change in pCCR5 MFI on day –6 (patient not yet on MVC) and day 0 (patient on MVC) CD8 T cells. Stimulation has an effect on day –6 but not day 0; exogenous MVC has an effect on day –6 that is ameliorated by day 0. (C) Representative flow plots and MFIs of sufficiently blocked patient 04712-018 (top) and insufficiently blocked patient 04712-005 (bottom). (D) Heterogeneity in %change in pCCR5 MFI on day 0 in response to exogenous MVC. Those patients whose MFI dropped by more than 20% compared with the unstimulated control were considered to have insufficient blockade, because additional MVC had an additional effect. ***P < .001. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 594-599DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.028) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Blockade insufficiency is predictive of worse outcomes. Insufficient blockade on day 0 is associated with increased risk of (A) death (HR, 10.6; P = .004), (B) GRFS (HR, 3.4; P = .04), (C) grades III to IV acute GVHD incidence (HR, 12; P = .009), and (D) NRM (HR, 146; P = .04). Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 594-599DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.028) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Peritransplant increase in T cell CCR5 surface expression. CCR5 expression on (A) CD4 and (B) CD8 T cells. On both CD4 and CD8 T cells, recipient pretransplant CCR5 expression was elevated compared with healthy donor control, increased by day of transplant in response to MVC and chemotherapy and dropped to an intermediate level. (C) Representative CCR5 expression flow plots of pretransplant “CCR5lo” and “CCR5hi” patient CD8 T cells. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 594-599DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.028) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Recipient pretransplant CD8 T cell CCR5 expression is predictive of outcomes. High CD8 T cell CCR5 surface expression is associated with increased risk of (A) death (HR, 3.9; P = .06), (B) GRFS (HR, 3.2; P = .03), and (C) NRM (HR, 6.2x108; P < .001). Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2018 24, 594-599DOI: (10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.10.028) Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Terms and Conditions