H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Hypoxia Enhances the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (July 2018)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Claire A. Higgins, Munenari Itoh, Keita Inoue, Gavin D
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
PDGFRA Is Not Essential for the Derivation and Maintenance of Mouse Extraembryonic Endoderm Stem Cell Lines  Jiangwei Lin, Mona Khan, Bolek Zapiec, Peter.
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (December 2017)
Wnt Signaling Promotes Reprogramming of Somatic Cells to Pluripotency
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Robust Self-Renewal of Rat Embryonic Stem Cells Requires Fine-Tuning of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibition  Yaoyao Chen, Kathryn Blair, Austin Smith 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (July 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Jamie A. Hackett, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Sabine Dietmann, M. Azim Surani 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Transient Expression of WNT2 Promotes Somatic Cell Reprogramming by Inducing β- Catenin Nuclear Accumulation  Mizuki Kimura, May Nakajima-Koyama, Joonseong.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Reprogramming Roadblocks Are System Dependent
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Activin Signals through SMAD2/3 to Increase Photoreceptor Precursor Yield during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation  Amy Q. Lu, Evgenya Y. Popova, Colin.
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
SIRT1 Is Necessary for Proficient Telomere Elongation and Genomic Stability of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells  Maria Luigia De Bonis, Sagrario Ortega,
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (February 2019)
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Derivation of Mouse Haploid Trophoblast Stem Cells
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (March 2019)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Presentation transcript:

H1foo Has a Pivotal Role in Qualifying Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Akira Kunitomi, Shinsuke Yuasa, Fumihiro Sugiyama, Yuki Saito, Tomohisa Seki, Dai Kusumoto, Shin Kashimura, Makoto Takei, Shugo Tohyama, Hisayuki Hashimoto, Toru Egashira, Yoko Tanimoto, Saori Mizuno, Shoma Tanaka, Hironobu Okuno, Kazuki Yamazawa, Hideo Watanabe, Mayumi Oda, Ruri Kaneda, Yumi Matsuzaki, Toshihiro Nagai, Hideyuki Okano, Ken-ichi Yagami, Mamoru Tanaka, Keiichi Fukuda  Stem Cell Reports  Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 825-833 (June 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015 Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Stem Cell Reports 2016 6, 825-833DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Exogenous Expression of H1foo Promotes iPSC Generation (A) Immunostaining for H1foo (red), including nuclei stained with DAPI (blue) and bright-field (BF) images. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Immunostaining for H1foo (red) with a 2D image (left) and a 2.5D image (right). The density of H1foo is depicted by the height in the 2.5D view. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of endogenous H1foo expression during reprogramming, normalized by H1foo expression in H1foo-overexpressed MEFs (n = 3 independent experiments). (D) Alkaline phosphatase-positive iPSC colony formations for OSK, OSK with H1a (OSK + H1a; OSKA), OSK with H1c (OSK + H1c; OSKC), and OSK with H1foo (OSK + H1foo; OSKH). Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. (E) Immunostaining for pluripotency markers (OCT4 [green], SSEA1 [green], and Nanog [red]), including H1foo (red) and nuclei stained with DAPI (blue) in OSK-iPSCs and OSKH-iPSCs. Scale bars, 20 μm. (F) Number of Nanog-GFP-positive iPSC colonies in each experiment (n = 5 independent experiments). (G) Proportion of Nanog-GFP-positive colonies to the total number of ESC-like colonies. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 5 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. Stem Cell Reports 2016 6, 825-833DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Characteristics of OSKH-Induced iPSCs (A) qRT-PCR analysis of pluripotency genes and H1foo in iPSCs. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). (B and C) Pairwise scatterplots of global gene-expression cDNA microarray patterns of OSKH-iPSCs (n = 4) compared with ESC (n = 1) (B) or OSK-iPSCs (n = 3) (C). The gray lines indicate log2 2-fold changes in gene-expression levels between the paired cell types. (D and E) Degree of DNA methylation at IG-DMR and Gtl2-DMR in four OSK iPSC clones, four OSKH-iPSC clones, and ESCs, as well as MEFs analyzed by pyrosequencing. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). Stem Cell Reports 2016 6, 825-833DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 In Vitro Differentiation Potential in OSKH-iPSCs (A) Number of EBs on day 5 after differentiation. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. (B) Size of EBs on day 5 after differentiation. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. (C) Variance of EB sizes from each ESCs and iPSCs (n = 3 independent experiments). (D) Variation of EB sizes. Each bar represents one experiment. (E and F) Cell-proliferation markers Ki67 (E) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; F) on day 2 after differentiation. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. (G) Apoptotic cell distribution determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of cells labeled with annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate and propidium iodide (PI) on day 1 after differentiation induction. Error bars represent the SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). ∗p < 0.05. Stem Cell Reports 2016 6, 825-833DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In Vivo Differentiation Potential in OSKH-iPSCs (A) Chromosome number of each iPSC. (B) Chimeric mice generated from OSK-iPSCs or OSKH-iPSCs. (C) Number of agouti coat colored chimeric mice derived from each of four replicates of iPSCs. (D) Birth rate of 100% chimeric mice (100% chimeric mice/embryos transferred). (E) The coat color of pups from a 100% chimeric OSKH mouse shows germline transmission. Stem Cell Reports 2016 6, 825-833DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.04.015) Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions