Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Advertisements

Alternative Computational Analysis Shows No Evidence for Nucleosome Enrichment at Repetitive Sequences in Mammalian Spermatozoa  Hélène Royo, Michael Beda.
Thuy T.M. Ngo, Qiucen Zhang, Ruobo Zhou, Jaya G. Yodh, Taekjip Ha  Cell 
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (November 2003)
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Xue Q. Gong, Chunfen Zhang, Michael Feig, Zachary F. Burton 
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
The Mechanochemical Cycle of Mammalian Kinesin-2 KIF3A/B under Load
A Massively Parallel Reporter Assay of 3′ UTR Sequences Identifies In Vivo Rules for mRNA Degradation  Michal Rabani, Lindsey Pieper, Guo-Liang Chew,
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
On the Origin of Kinesin Limping
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 129, Issue 7, Pages (June 2007)
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Joseph Rodriguez, Jerome S. Menet, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
The Control Mechanism for Lagging Strand Polymerase Recycling during Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication  Jingsong Yang, Scott W. Nelson, Stephen J. Benkovic 
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
The Mechanochemical Cycle of Mammalian Kinesin-2 KIF3A/B under Load
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
A Movie of RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2018)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Facilitated Recycling Pathway for RNA Polymerase III
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Transcription Initiation in a Single-Subunit RNA Polymerase Proceeds through DNA Scrunching and Rotation of the N-Terminal Subdomains  Guo-Qing Tang,
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (February 2015)
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Translocation of σ70 with RNA Polymerase during Transcription
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Modification of the Properties of Elongating RNA Polymerase by Persistent Association with Nascent Antiterminator RNA  Ranjan Sen, Rodney A King, Robert.
Probing the Limits to Positional Information
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Thomas J Santangelo, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Yufang Wang, Ling Guo, Ido Golding, Edward C. Cox, N.P. Ong 
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Presentation transcript:

Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages 1083-1094 (June 2006) Sequence-Resolved Detection of Pausing by Single RNA Polymerase Molecules  Kristina M. Herbert, Arthur La Porta, Becky J. Wong, Rachel A. Mooney, Keir C. Neuman, Robert Landick, Steven M. Block  Cell  Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages 1083-1094 (June 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Single-Molecule Transcription on Engineered Templates (A) Engineered transcription templates. Single ∼230 bp repeat motifs (red arrow) consist of a leader sequence (pink) with an associated defined pause (consisting of a his or an ops element; gray), along with rpoB gene sequences (light green) and flanking DNA corresponding to restriction sites used in cloning (blue). Transcription templates consist of eight repeat motifs located ∼1100 bp beyond a T7 A1 promoter (dark green), from which transcription was initiated, and ∼80 bp in front of the rrnB T1 terminator (yellow). Templates were labeled on the transcriptionally upstream end with digoxigenin (orange). (B) Cartoon of the experimental geometry (not to scale). Two polystyrene beads (light blue) are held in optical traps (pink) above the surface of a coverglass. A biotin label (black) on RNAP (green) is used to attach RNAP to the smaller bead by an avidin linkage (yellow). The 3′ upstream end of the DNA (dark blue), labeled with digoxigenin (orange), is bound to a slightly larger bead by an anti-digoxigenin linkage (purple). Transcription proceeds in the direction shown (green arrow), and polymerase experiences an assisting load. (C) Seven (of n = 61) representative records of transcription along the ∼3 kb ops repeat template versus time for single transcribing RNAP molecules. Records are shown after alignment, as described: Most records display distinct pauses at locations corresponding to ops sites (gray lines) and elsewhere. Four (of n = 25) records that dissociated at the location of the rrnB T1 terminator (yellow) are displayed (red traces); three (of n = 36) records that read through or dissociate prior to the terminator are shown (blue traces). Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Record Alignment and Pause Locations Identified (A–C) Dwell-time histograms were compiled for each transcriptional record as a function of position. The logarithms of these histograms were then averaged for groups of records, as follows: (A) Average log dwell-time histogram for his records (n = 53) before any rescaling or offsets applied. (B) Average log dwell-time histogram for terminating his traces (n = 27) after initial rescaling and alignment of records at the termination site. (C) Average log dwell-time histogram for all his traces (n = 53) after final alignment. (D) Average log dwell-time histogram for aligned data computed from all eight repeats for the his repeat motif (red; n = 53 molecules, 310 records) and the ops repeat motif (magenta; n = 61 molecules, 419 records), shown with the bootstrapped standard deviations (white). Background color indicates origin of the underlying sequences: rpoB gene (green), restriction sites used for cloning (light blue), regulatory pause region (pink), ops pause site (dark gray), his pause site (light gray). Major pause sites are labeled. (E) Comparison of single-molecule and bulk transcription data. A simulated transcription gel was created from the dataset in (D) using a grayscale proportional to the peak height and scaling the position logarithmically to approximate RNA gel mobility. [α-32P]GMP-labeled transcription complexes were incubated with 250 μM NTPs, quenched at times between 0 s and 180 s, and run on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Lane L shows the MspI pBR322 ladder; lane C is a chase. Lines are drawn between corresponding bands identified in single-molecule and gel data, color coded as in (D). Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequence Similarities for Identified Pauses Table of DNA sequences underlying each pause, as mapped by transcription gels, along with the corresponding positions identified in single-molecule records. Top row: Consensus sequence generated from alignment of all pause regions: a–d sites, primary and secondary ops sites (ops1 and ops2, respectively), and his site. Also shown is the associated information, in bits, for each consensus base (Gorodkin et al., 1997). Lower rows: Downstream DNA sequences in advance of each pause are displayed (blue letters), along with the trailing sequence corresponding to the nascent RNA (red; with T substituted for U), with the region subtended by the RNA:DNA hybrid identified (red underline). The translocation state of RNAP at each pause site is indicated (green bars; the widths of these bars show estimated errors in localizing the position from single-molecule data). Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Pause Efficiency Is Sequence Dependent (A) Histogram of the mean density of pauses (t > 1 s) versus template position for the ops repeat template motif (1 bp bins). White bars show the running density + SD based on bootstrapped error estimates. Events within ±5 bp of identified pause sites are color coded according to the scheme of Figure 2. The percentages of all events associated with each labeled pause are shown. (B) Histogram of the mean density of pauses versus template position for the his repeat template motif. Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Lifetimes and Efficiencies for Individual Pauses Histograms of identified pause dwell times, color coded according to the labeling scheme of Figure 2, with exponential fits. Measured apparent pause lifetimes (τ∗) and corrected pause efficiencies (ɛ) are shown with estimated errors. Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Pause Pathway and Pause Correlations (A) Simple off-pathway model for transcriptional pausing where the pause state competes kinetically with elongation. Steps in the normal elongation cycle are represented by a single transition with rate kn. The rate of entering or exiting a pause is kp or k−p, respectively. Corrected pause efficiency (ɛ), pause lifetime (τ), and apparent pause lifetime (τ∗) are shown in terms of individual rate constants. (B) Pause density (pauses/100 bp) versus inverse elongation velocity. Each point corresponds to 1 of n = 114 individual molecules. The correlation coefficient is r = 0.71 (p = 6 × 10−19). (C) Pause frequency (pauses/s) versus inverse elongation velocity. Each point corresponds to 1 of n = 114 individual molecules. The correlation coefficient is r = 0.16 (p = 0.1). (D) Corrected pause efficiencies (ɛ), pause lifetimes (τ), and apparent pause lifetimes (τ∗) for each of the identified pause sites. Correlations (and corresponding p values) between inverse velocity and apparent pause efficiency are shown. Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 RNAP Heterogeneity (A) Apparent pause efficiency versus repeat number of the pause site (numbered from 1 to 8) for sites indicated. (B) Correlation between pausing at a given site and during a subsequent visit to an equivalent site, plotted versus the distance between the pair of sites, measured in units of the motif repeat number (see Experimental Procedures). Probable errors (SD) were estimated from simulations. Cell 2006 125, 1083-1094DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.032) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions