Volume 142, Issue 5, Pages e2 (May 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado
Advertisements

1 Top-Down vs Step-Up Trial Endoscopic Substudy: Mucosal Healing Patients, % P
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 134, Issue 7, Pages (June 2008)
Guillaume Bouguen, Barrett G. Levesque, Brian G
Volume 145, Issue 4, Pages e2 (October 2013)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease and Secondary Failure to Infliximab  William J. Sandborn, Maria T. Abreu, Geert.
Abatacept for Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 147, Issue 6, Pages e3 (December 2014)
The Probiotic Preparation, VSL#3 Induces Remission in Patients With Mild-to- Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis  Ajit Sood, Vandana Midha, Govind K.
Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease  Stephen B Hanauer, Carrie L Wagner,
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 154, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Efficacy of Vedolizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis, Regardless of Prior Exposure to Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists 
Levels of C-reactive Protein Are Associated With Response to Infliximab Therapy in Patients With Crohn's Disease  Matthias Jürgens, Jestinah M. Mahachie.
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 134, Issue 7, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Oral pentasa in the treatment of active Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis of double- blind, placebo-controlled trials  Stephen B Hanauer, Ulf Strömberg 
Association Between Plasma Concentrations of Certolizumab Pegol and Endoscopic Outcomes of Patients With Crohn's Disease  Jean–Frédéric Colombel, William.
Infliximab Prevents Crohn's Disease Recurrence After Ileal Resection
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2012)
Safety and Efficacy of Budesonide Oral Suspension Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis  Evan S. Dellon, David A. Katzka, Margaret.
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 148, Issue 7, Pages e3 (June 2015)
Volume 147, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2014)
Volume 146, Issue 1, Pages e1 (January 2014)
Safety of Celecoxib in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Remission: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Pilot Study  William J. Sandborn, William F. Stenson,
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages e2 (December 2015)
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 147, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2014)
Adalimumab Induces Deep Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease
William J. Sandborn, Stefan Schreiber, Brian G
Volume 146, Issue 4, Pages e2 (April 2014)
Volume 145, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2013)
Volume 150, Issue 2, Pages e9 (February 2016)
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 146, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2014)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages e18 (March 2019)
David H. Bruining, William J. Sandborn 
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 148, Issue 4, Pages e2 (April 2015)
Volume 149, Issue 1, Pages e6 (July 2015)
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 150, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Mucosal Healing Is Associated With Improved Long-term Outcomes of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis  Shailja C.
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Correlation Between the Crohn's Disease Activity and Harvey–Bradshaw Indices in Assessing Crohn's Disease Severity  Severine Vermeire, Stefan Schreiber,
Volume 126, Issue 2, Pages (February 2004)
Reinduction With Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Relapsed Crohn's Disease: Results From the PRECiSE 4 Study  William J. Sandborn, Stefan Schreiber,
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Nicolas Williet, William J. Sandborn, Laurent Peyrin–Biroulet 
Walter Reinisch, Jean-Frederic Colombel, William J
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 117, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Agreement of site and central readings of ileocolonoscopic scores in Crohn's disease: comparison using data from the EXTEND trial  Paul Rutgeerts, MD,
Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2012)
Endoscopic Assessment and Treating to Target Increase the Likelihood of Mucosal Healing in Patients With Crohn’s Disease  Guillaume Bouguen, Barrett G.
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 157, Issue 2, Pages e8 (August 2019)
Alan Menter, MD, Stephen K
Continuous Therapy With Certolizumab Pegol Maintains Remission of Patients With Crohn's Disease for up to 18 Months  Gary R. Lichtenstein, Ole Ø. Thomsen,
Volume 157, Issue 4, Pages e6 (October 2019)
Combination Therapy With Infliximab and Azathioprine Improves Infliximab Pharmacokinetic Features and Efficacy: A Post Hoc Analysis  Jean-Frédéric Colombel,
Study design. Study design. Patients who completed the 8-week induction study and achieved clinical response-100 (decrease in Crohn's disease activity.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 142, Issue 5, Pages 1102-1111.e2 (May 2012) Adalimumab Induces and Maintains Mucosal Healing in Patients With Crohn's Disease: Data From the EXTEND Trial  Paul Rutgeerts, Gert Van Assche, William J. Sandborn, Douglas C. Wolf, Karel Geboes, Jean–Frédéric Colombel, Walter Reinisch, Ashish Kumar, Andreas Lazar, Anne Camez, Kathleen G. Lomax, Paul F. Pollack, Geert D'Haens  Gastroenterology  Volume 142, Issue 5, Pages 1102-1111.e2 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.035 Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 EXTEND study design. The primary efficacy end point was complete mucosal healing (ie, absence of mucosal ulceration) as determined by the review committee's visual assessment of the ileocolonoscopies at week 12. Patients who continued on blinded therapy for the full duration of the trial or who switched to open-label therapy before week 12 had 3 ileocolonoscopies (baseline, week 12/switch to open label, and week 52/termination). Patients who remained on their randomized treatment until week 12 and subsequently switched to open-label therapy had 4 ileocolonoscopies (baseline, week 12, switch to open label every other week [eow], and week 52/termination). aAdalimumab induction only with placebo maintenance; reinitiation of adalimumab for flare/nonresponse. Gastroenterology 2012 142, 1102-1111.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.035) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Efficacy of adalimumab for sustained mucosal healing. (A) Mucosal healing results at week 12 and week 52 per the review committee's assessment of the absence of mucosal ulceration; all analyses of complete mucosal healing included only patients with ulceration at screening as judged by the review committee. Patients who switched to open-label adalimumab between week 8 and week 12 underwent ileocolonoscopy before receiving their first doses of open-label therapy, and the results were carried forward to week 12 for the primary analysis. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing information on mucosal ulceration at weeks 12 and 52, whereby patients with missing data for mucosal healing were considered to have mucosal ulceration. For the analysis at week 52, patients who discontinued or switched to open-label treatment before week 52 were considered as having mucosal ulceration at week 52. Treatment displayed is original treatment at randomization. (B) Mucosal healing rates at week 12 and week 52 by median CDEIS score (CDEIS ≤9 or >9) at baseline. (C) CDEIS remission, defined as a CDEIS score of ≤4, at weeks 12 and 52. (D) CDEIS response, defined as a decrease in CDEIS >75% from baseline, at weeks 12 and 52. (E) CDAI remission using nonresponder imputation for missing clinical remission and for patients who entered the open-label phase at week 52. aP value from Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test with CR-70 status at week 4 as the stratification factor. bComplete mucosal healing at week 12 was the primary end point. Four patients randomized to placebo and 2 patients randomized to continuous adalimumab every other week were excluded from the analyses of mucosal healing owing to absence of mucosal ulceration at screening (as judged by the review committee). cPer protocol represents all intent-to-treat (ITT) patients who did not have a significant protocol deviation; 6 ITT patients (1 with continuous adalimumab, 5 with induction only/placebo) were excluded: one adalimumab-treated patient did not meet diagnosis guidelines for ileocolonic CD, 2 patients in the induction-only/placebo group received the wrong dosage, 2 patients in the induction-only/placebo group had a baseline CDAI score >450, and one patient in the induction only/placebo group lacked documentation of the required degree of mucosal ulceration. dITT = 129 randomized patients; treatment displayed is original treatment at randomization. eITT = 129 randomized patients, irrespective of the review committee's assessment of the presence of mucosal ulceration at screening. Gastroenterology 2012 142, 1102-1111.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.035) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Supplementary Figure S1 EXTEND patient disposition. A total of 135 patients entered the induction phase and received adalimumab 160 mg at baseline/week 0 and 80 mg at week 2; 129 patients were randomized at week 4 (65 to induction only/placebo and 64 to continuous adalimumab). Eighteen patients (28.1%) randomized to adalimumab had their dosage increased to adalimumab 40 mg weekly. Five patients (8%) randomized to induction only/placebo and 10 patients (16%) randomized to continuous adalimumab discontinued from the study during the double-blind phase. eow, every other week. Gastroenterology 2012 142, 1102-1111.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2012.01.035) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions