How Dopamine Enhances an Optimism Bias in Humans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fumihiro Kano, Satoshi Hirata  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Risk-Responsive Orbitofrontal Neurons Track Acquired Salience
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Dopamine Modulates Egalitarian Behavior in Humans
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
GABAergic Modulation of Visual Gamma and Alpha Oscillations and Its Consequences for Working Memory Performance  Diego Lozano-Soldevilla, Niels ter Huurne,
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages R941-R945 (December 2011)
Choosing Goals, Not Rules: Deciding among Rule-Based Action Plans
Neuroscience: Impaired Decision-Making in Parkinson’s Disease
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages (July 2016)
Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict
Sing-Hang Cheung, Fang Fang, Sheng He, Gordon E. Legge  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 20, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Dopamine Modulates Egalitarian Behavior in Humans
Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford  Current Biology 
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Human Hippocampal Dynamics during Response Conflict
Fumihiro Kano, Satoshi Hirata  Current Biology 
Jason Samaha, Bradley R. Postle  Current Biology 
Rats Remember Items in Context Using Episodic Memory
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
Jeffrey Cockburn, Anne G.E. Collins, Michael J. Frank  Neuron 
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Disruption of Perceptual Learning by a Brief Practice Break
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Multiple Timescales of Memory in Lateral Habenula and Dopamine Neurons
Single-Unit Responses Selective for Whole Faces in the Human Amygdala
Acetylcholine Mediates Behavioral and Neural Post-Error Control
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision
A Scalable Population Code for Time in the Striatum
Source Memory in the Rat
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Event-Based Prospective Memory in the Rat
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
The sound of change: visually-induced auditory synesthesia
Dissociable Effects of Salience on Attention and Goal-Directed Action
Masaya Hirashima, Daichi Nozaki  Current Biology 
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Andrew Clouter, Kimron L. Shapiro, Simon Hanslmayr  Current Biology 
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
Humans Have an Expectation That Gaze Is Directed Toward Them
Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia  Galia Avidan, Marlene Behrmann  Current.
Function and Structure of Human Left Fusiform Cortex Are Closely Associated with Perceptual Learning of Faces  Taiyong Bi, Juan Chen, Tiangang Zhou, Yong.
Silvia Convento, Md. Shoaibur Rahman, Jeffrey M. Yau  Current Biology 
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking
Human Hippocampus Arbitrates Approach-Avoidance Conflict
The challenge of measuring long-term positive aftereffects
Christoph Kayser, Nikos K. Logothetis, Stefano Panzeri  Current Biology 
Similarity Breeds Proximity: Pattern Similarity within and across Contexts Is Related to Later Mnemonic Judgments of Temporal Proximity  Youssef Ezzyat,
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
Impaired Associative Learning with Food Rewards in Obese Women
Li Zhaoping, Nathalie Guyader  Current Biology 
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

How Dopamine Enhances an Optimism Bias in Humans Tali Sharot, Marc Guitart-Masip, Christoph W. Korn, Rumana Chowdhury, Raymond J. Dolan  Current Biology  Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages 1477-1481 (August 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Task Design (A) On each trial, participants were presented with a short description of one of 40 adverse life events and asked to estimate how likely this event was to occur to them. They were then presented with the average probability of that event occurring to a person like themselves, living in the same sociocultural environment. For each event, an estimation error term was calculated as the difference between the participant's estimation and the information provided. The second session was the same as the first session. For each event, an update term was calculated as the absolute difference between the participant's first and second estimations. Participants completed both sessions twice on two separate days, with different stimuli, once under placebo and once after the administration of the drug. (B and C) Examples of trials for which the participant's estimate was higher (B) or lower (C) than the average probability. Here, for illustration purposes, the blue and red frames denote the participant's response (either an overestimation or underestimation, respectively). For illustration purposes, the blue and red filled boxes denote information that calls for an adjustment in an optimistic (desirable) (B) or pessimistic (undesirable) (C) direction. Current Biology 2012 22, 1477-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 L-DOPA Enhances the Optimism Bias by Impairing Update for Undesirable Information (A) Change in bias is equal to the bias after participants were presented with the average probability minus the bias before. Bias is equal to the signed estimation errors (= participant's estimate of the likelihoods of encountering future adverse events − average probability presented). Note that the extent of the bias does not signify accuracy. A score of zero indicates that the extent of overestimation is equal to the extent of underestimation (i.e., errors are not biased in any direction). A negative score indicates bias is optimistic; a positive score indicates bias is pessimistic. Administration of L-DOPA enhanced the change in bias toward an optimistic direction (after controlling for differential memory and differential scores on all rating scales). See also Table S1. (B) Absolute update (participant's second estimate − first estimate) for trials where participants received desirable information that presented an opportunity to adopt a more optimistic outlook, and for trials where they received undesirable information calling for a more pessimistic estimate. Update in response to undesirable information was reduced in the L-DOPA condition relative to placebo. (C) The decrease in updating from negative information in the L-DOPA condition relative to placebo is shown for all subjects. Subjects are ordered according to the magnitude of the effect (ascending). Error bars represent SEM corrected for within-subject design [22]. ∗p < 0.05. Current Biology 2012 22, 1477-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Memory for Information Provided Memory performance for the information provided was calculated as the absolute difference between the statistical number presented for each event and the participants' recollection of that number. These memory errors are presented for trials where participants received desirable information that presented an opportunity to adopt a more optimistic outlook, and for trials where they received undesirable information calling for a more pessimistic estimate, in the L-DOPA and placebo conditions. Error bars represent SEM corrected for within-subject design [22]. ∗p < 0.05. See also Table S1. Current Biology 2012 22, 1477-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.053) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions