Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Advertisements

Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
The Mcm2-7 Complex Has In Vitro Helicase Activity
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Haley D.M. Wyatt, Shriparna Sarbajna, Joao Matos, Stephen C. West 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Daan C. Swarts, John van der Oost, Martin Jinek  Molecular Cell 
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e4 (September 2017)
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Tonko Buterin, Christoph Meyer, Bernd Giese, Hanspeter Naegeli 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Zbigniew Dominski, Xiao-cui Yang, William F. Marzluff  Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Crystal Structure of Human Mre11: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Endonucleolytic Function of MutLα in Human Mismatch Repair
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
RNA-Independent DNA Cleavage Activities of Cas9 and Cas12a
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Jesse Easter, James W Gober  Molecular Cell 
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Hayun Lee, Yi Zhou, David W. Taylor, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Dynamics of Leading-Strand Lesion Skipping by the Replisome
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination  Yunmei.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Uncoupling Promoter Opening from Start-Site Scanning
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
An SOS Inhibitor that Binds to Free RecA Protein: The PsiB Protein
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
DNA Repair Has a New FAN1 Club
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
A RecA Filament Capping Mechanism for RecX Protein
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon Lee, Sucheta Arora, Tanya T. Paull  Molecular Cell  Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 593-606 (November 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 hMRN Complex Exhibits Endonuclease Activity on Protein-Blocked Ends (A) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a 50 bp dsDNA substrate containing a 5′ biotin-streptavidin block (B-Strep) and 3′ [32P] label as indicated. “sss” on the top strand denotes 5 phosphorothioate bonds at the 3′ end to prevent exonucleolytic degradation. Reactions contained Nbs1 (50 and 100 nM), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, and 1 mM ATP as indicated and were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. A total of 0.5 mM nucleotide was used for reactions in lanes 13–15. Reaction products were separated on a denaturing polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by phosphorimager. (B) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed as in (A) with 50 nM Nbs1. Mre11 inhibitors were added to reactions at 20, 100, and 500 μM, with equivalent volume of DMSO added to reactions without inhibitor. (C) hMR (50 nM) was assayed as in (A) except with 197 bp dsDNA with Nbs1 added as indicated. (D) hMR wild-type and H129N (50 nM) with equimolar Nbs1 was assayed as in (A) except with 197 bp dsDNA with ATP and streptavidin added as indicated. Red arrows indicate sites of nuclease digestion on substrate, and arrows and brackets on gels indicate degradation products. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Nbs1 Modulates Mre11 Nuclease Activities (A) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a 50 bp dsDNA substrate containing a 5′ biotin-streptavidin block (B-Strep) and a 5′ [32P] label as indicated. “sss” on the top strand denotes 5 phosphorothioate bonds at the 3′ end to prevent exonucleolytic degradation. A version of the same substrate containing a nick on bottom strand was used in the reactions in lanes 7–12 as indicated. Reactions contained 12.5, 25, and 50 nM Nbs1 and were performed as in Figure 1A. (B) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed with substrates containing 5′ biotin (B) and 50 nM Nbs1 and streptavidin as indicated. (C) yMR wild-type complex was incubated with substrates as described in (A). Reactions contained 50 nM yMR, 50 nM Xrs2, and 100 nM wild-type Sae2 as indicated, except for lanes 11–13 (3.125 nM yMR and Xrs2), and were incubated at 30°C for 30 min. (D) yMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed as described in (C) in reactions containing 50 nM Xrs2 and streptavidin as indicated. Red arrows indicate sites and direction of nuclease digestion. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATP Enhances 3′-5′ Exonuclease Activity at a Nick with 5′ Blocked End but Restricts 3′-5′ Exonuclease Activity on a 3′ Recessed End (A) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using the 50 bp dsDNA substrate containing 5′ biotin (B), a 5′ [32P] label, and a nick or a 3′ recessed end on the bottom strand, as shown, with 50 nM Nbs1, and assays were performed as in Figure 1A. A total of 1 mM ATP and streptavidin were added to the reactions as indicated. (B) 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of hMR complexes (50 nM) with equimolar Nbs1 was assayed in 1 mM MnCl2 using a 5′ [32P]-labeled substrate with a 4 nt 3′ recessed end and ATP as indicated. (C) 3′-5′ exonuclease activity of yMR complexes (50 nM) with equimolar Xrs2 was assayed as in (B). (D) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a 50 bp dsDNA substrate with a nick in the bottom strand as indicated. Reactions were performed in presence of Mre11 inhibitors as in Figure 1B. (E) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a DNA substrate containing a 3′ recessed bottom strand. Reactions were performed in triplicate with 50 nM Nbs1, 1 mM MnCl2, and 100 μM inhibitors. Red arrows indicate sites and direction of nuclease digestion. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Nbs1 Enhances Mre11 Nuclease Activity on a 3′ Strand Opposite a Blocked End (A) Human MR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using the 50 bp substrate with 5′ radiolabel on top strand as shown, and assays were performed as in Figure 1A. A total of 50 nM Nbs1 was added as indicated. (B) Human MR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed as in (A) with 50 nM Nbs1, and streptavidin, ATP, and Mn2+ were varied as indicated. (C) Human MRN wild-type and H129N complexes (50 nM) were assayed using the 50 bp substrate with 5′ radiolabel on the top strand as shown, and assays were performed as in Figure 1A. (D) yMR (50 nM) in presence of 50 nM Xrs2 and 100 nM Sae2 was assayed using the 50 bp substrate with 5′ radiolabel on top strand as shown. (E) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a 50 bp dsDNA substrate with a nick and a 5′ [32P] label on the top strand as shown. (F) yMR (50 nM) with equimolar Xrs2 was assayed using the substrate in (E). Red arrows indicate sites and direction of nuclease digestion on substrate, and arrows and brackets on gels indicate degradation products. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 hMRN Endonucleolytic Activity Is Stimulated by a Nick (A) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) with 50 nM Nbs1 was assayed using 50 bp dsDNA substrates containing a 5′ biotin-streptavidin block (B-Strep) and a nick (substrate II, V, and VI) as in Figure 1A. (B) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed using a 50 bp dsDNA substrate containing a 3′ or 5′ [32P] label on the bottom strand and a nick in the top strand with Nbs1 (50 nM) as indicated. (C) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) was assayed as in (B) with ATP and streptavidin added as indicated. (D) hMR wild-type complex (50 nM) with equimolar Nbs1 was assayed using a DNA substrate containing a 3′ biotin (B), a nick on one strand, and a 3′ or 5′ [32P] label as indicated. Red arrows indicate sites and direction of nuclease digestion on substrate, and arrows and brackets on gels indicate degradation products. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 CtIP Promotes hMRN Endonuclease Activity (A) hMR (50 nM) and equimolar Nbs1 were incubated with 5′-radiolabeled 197 bp dsDNA as in Figure 1A. CtIP wild-type or T847/T859 mutants (50, 100, and 200 nM) were added as indicated. (B) hMR (50 nM) was assayed as in (A) with CtIP-T847E/T859E (100 and 200 nM), with equimolar Nbs1 and other components varied as indicated. (C) hMR (50 nM) was assayed as in (A) in reactions containing Nbs1 (50 nM) and CtIP-T847E/T859E (200 nM) as indicated. Reactions were digested with Proteinase K at 37°C for 1 hr, separated on 8% native polyacrylamide gel, and analyzed by phosphorimager. Red arrows indicate sites of nuclease digestion on substrate, and arrows and brackets on gels indicate degradation products. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 MRN Removes Protein-DNA Adducts through Sequential Processing Events Regulated by Nbs1 (A) The current model for MRN nuclease activity (scenario I, dashed arrow) at 5′ protein adducts involves an initial endonucleolytic cleavage event followed by exonucleolytic degradation toward the blocked end. Based on our observations, hMRN mediates endonucleolytic cutting adjacent to the protein block, although this cut can occur on either the strand with the block (scenario I) or on the opposite strand (scenario II). The nicked strand is then further processed by hMRN 3′-5′ exonuclease activity, either toward the block (I) or away from it (II), creating ssDNA gaps. Another endonucleolytic event occurs at the ss-dsDNA transition, removing the block. This event releases a free DNA end that can be utilized by downstream processing machinery. A similar sequence of events is observed with a 3′ protein adduct (scenario III), if a nick close to the adduct is available for hMRN. All of the MR processing events shown in (A) are ATP and Nbs1 dependent, dependent on the protein block, and inhibited by PFM01 and PFM03. (B) hMR-catalyzed 3′-5′ exonuclease activity at a 3′ open end is inhibited by Nbs1 in the presence of ATP and also by PFM39. Molecular Cell 2016 64, 593-606DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2016.10.010) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions