Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adhesion Disengagement Uncouples Intrinsic and Extrinsic Forces to Drive Cytokinesis in Epithelial Tissues  Charlène Guillot, Thomas Lecuit  Developmental.
Advertisements

Stability and Nuclear Dynamics of the Bicoid Morphogen Gradient
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Epicardial Spindle Orientation Controls Cell Entry into the Myocardium
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Myosin II Dynamics Are Regulated by Tension in Intercalating Cells
Volume 17, Issue 24, Pages (December 2007)
Emergence of an Apical Epithelial Cell Surface In Vivo
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Transiently Reorganized Microtubules Are Essential for Zippering during Dorsal Closure in Drosophila melanogaster  Ferenc Jankovics, Damian Brunner  Developmental.
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Planar Cell Polarity Genes Regulate Polarized Extracellular Matrix Deposition during Frog Gastrulation  Toshiyasu Goto, Lance Davidson, Makoto Asashima,
Amy Shaub Maddox, Lindsay Lewellyn, Arshad Desai, Karen Oegema 
Ksenia Smurova, Benjamin Podbilewicz  Cell Reports 
Bryan W. Heck, Danelle Devenport  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 20, Pages (October 2006)
A Rho GTPase Signaling Pathway Is Used Reiteratively in Epithelial Folding and Potentially Selects the Outcome of Rho Activation  Kelly K. Nikolaidou,
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Slam Encodes a Developmental Regulator of Polarized Membrane Growth during Cleavage of the Drosophila Embryo  Thomas Lecuit, Reba Samanta, Eric Wieschaus 
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration  Kari Barlan, Maureen Cetera, Sally Horne-Badovinac 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages e4 (November 2017)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
DFezf/Earmuff Maintains the Restricted Developmental Potential of Intermediate Neural Progenitors in Drosophila  Mo Weng, Krista L. Golden, Cheng-Yu Lee 
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Myosin 2-Induced Mitotic Rounding Enables Columnar Epithelial Cells to Interpret Cortical Spindle Positioning Cues  Soline Chanet, Rishabh Sharan, Zia.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
APKC Controls Microtubule Organization to Balance Adherens Junction Symmetry and Planar Polarity during Development  Tony J.C. Harris, Mark Peifer  Developmental.
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Stefano Di Talia, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Ichiko Saotome, Marcello Curto, Andrea I McClatchey  Developmental Cell 
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Distinct Apical and Basolateral Mechanisms Drive Planar Cell Polarity-Dependent Convergent Extension of the Mouse Neural Plate  Margot Williams, Weiwei.
Epicardial Spindle Orientation Controls Cell Entry into the Myocardium
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Precocious Acquisition of Neuroepithelial Character in the Eye Field Underlies the Onset of Eye Morphogenesis  Kenzo Ivanovitch, Florencia Cavodeassi,
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages (August 2016)
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Franziska Aurich, Christian Dahmann  Cell Reports 
Cortical Flows Powered by Asymmetrical Contraction Transport PAR Proteins to Establish and Maintain Anterior-Posterior Polarity in the Early C. elegans.
Calcium Flashes Orchestrate the Wound Inflammatory Response through DUOX Activation and Hydrogen Peroxide Release  William Razzell, Iwan Robert Evans,
Adam Sokolow, Yusuke Toyama, Daniel P. Kiehart, Glenn S. Edwards 
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Intralineage Directional Notch Signaling Regulates Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Asymmetrically Dividing Radial Glia  Zhiqiang Dong, Nan Yang, Sang-Yeob.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Anna Marie Sokac, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Anup Padmanabhan, Hui Ting Ong, Ronen Zaidel-Bar  Current Biology 
Novel Functions for Integrins in Epithelial Morphogenesis
Emergence of an Apical Epithelial Cell Surface In Vivo
Spindle Position in Symmetric Cell Divisions during Epiboly Is Controlled by Opposing and Dynamic Apicobasal Forces  Sarah Woolner, Nancy Papalopulu 
Presentation transcript:

Distinct Rap1 Activity States Control the Extent of Epithelial Invagination via α-Catenin  Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell  Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 299-309 (May 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Two Dorsal Folds Undergo Distinct Extent of Invagination (A and B) Two-photon time-lapse images of the dorsal epithelium in gastrulating wild-type embryos expressing E-Cadherin-GFP (green) and membrane-mCherry (magenta). AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. The midsagittal section view (A) shows the initial junctional shift at the onset of gastrulation (0 s) and the eventual morphology of the dorsal folds (800 s). Dashed curves indicate the bottom of the dorsal folds. The dorsal view (B) shows a single Z slice at 8 μm below the embryonic surface at three time points: prior to the junctional shift (−660 s), onset of gastrulation (0 s), and the completion of dorsal fold formation (900 s). Cells shaded in light yellow and blue are neighboring cells that reside in the region between the anterior and posterior fold-initiating cells and ultimately undergo invagination into the anterior and posterior folds as determined by tracing the anterior and posterior borders of the cells that remain on the embryonic surface at the 900 s time point (labeled with color-coded open circles and squares). Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Total dorsal fold length as a function of time. Dorsal fold length was measured as the vertical distance between the embryonic surface and the bottom of the fold and normalized by the initial length at the onset of gastrulation (time = 0). Each trace represents measurements from one embryo (n = 5). See also Figure S1 and Movie S1. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Abrogation of α-Catenin Promotes Epithelial Invagination (A and B) Confocal midsagittal section of immunofluorescence of junctional core component Armadillo (green) and membrane marker Neurotactin (magenta) in the dorsal epithelium of an α-catenin RNAi embryo at the onset of gastrulation (A) or at the end of dorsal fold formation (B). (C) Two-photon time-lapse images of the midsagittal section view of the membrane marker Resille-GFP in a gastrulating α-catenin RNAi embryo. Dashed curves indicate the bottom of the dorsal folds. Light blue arrow indicates invagination of all intervening cells. Many cells round up or become severely distorted after completion of dorsal fold formation (2,150 s). (D) Comparison of total dorsal fold length as a function of time between the wild-type and α-catenin RNAi (n = 5) embryos. (E) Two-photon time-lapse images of the dorsal view of E-Cadherin-GFP in a gastrulating α-catenin RNAi embryo. All neighboring cells in the intervening region between dorsal folds become invaginated into the anterior and posterior folds (shaded in light yellow and blue in D) as determined by cell tracing denoted with color-coded open circles and squares. This results in the closure of the gap between dorsal folds (the region between yellow and blue dashed lines). (F) Two-photon time-lapse images of the midsagittal section view of Resille-GFP in the dorsal epithelium of a shotgun RNAi embryo during cellularization (−800 s) or gastrulation (0 and 600 s). AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. Scale bar, 10 μm. See also Figure S2 and Movie S2. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Constitutive Activation of Rap1 Restricts Epithelial Invagination in an α-Catenin-Dependent Manner (A) Two-photon time-lapse images of the midsagittal section view of E-Cadherin-GFP in the dorsal epithelium of a gastrulating embryo overexpressing Rap1V12. AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. Scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Comparison of total dorsal fold length as a function of time between the wild-type embryos and embryos overexpressing Rap1V12 (n = 6). (C) Comparison of total posterior fold and anterior fold length as a function of time between the wild-type, α-catenin RNAi embryos and α-catenin RNAi embryos overexpressing RapV12 (n = 6). See also Movie S3. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Expression Pattern and Loss-of-Function Phenotype of Rapgap1 (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of Rapgap1 transcript visualized at the midsagittal view at two different stages: midcellularization (A1, boxed area enlarged in A3) and dorsal fold initiation (A2, boxed area enlarged in A4). Red and blue asterisks denote the anterior and posterior folds. (B) Confocal midsagittal section of Rapgap1 immunofluorescence in a wild-type embryo during dorsal fold initiation. AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Normalized Rapgap1 immunofluorescence in individual cells in the region between the two dorsal folds plotted against the anterior-posterior position (represented by the x axis coordinate) of these cells. The insets show three-dimensional reconstruction models of the cells from which the measurements were derived. The red squares represent measurements from the three to four rows of cells that are immediately adjacent to the anterior fold, while the blue triangles represent the nine to ten rows of cells that are adjacent to the posterior fold. (D) Two-photon time-lapse images of the midsagittal section view of E-Cadherin-GFP in the dorsal epithelium of a Rapgap1 mutant embryo. (E) Comparison of total dorsal fold length as a function of time between the wild-type and Rapgap1 (n = 10) mutant embryos. (F) Two-photon time-lapse images of the dorsal view of E-Cadherin-GFP in a Rapgap1 mutant embryo. Cells at the anterior and posterior borders of those cells that remain on the embryonic surface are labeled with color-coded open circles and squares. Cells that invaginate into the anterior and posterior folds are shaded in light yellow and blue. AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. See also Movies S4 and S6. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Neighboring Cell Geometries Correlate with Extent of Epithelial Invagination (A) Normalized length of the apical domain perimeter as a function of time in the #3 and #4 neighboring cells in wild-type, α-catenin RNAi, and Rap1V12-overexpressing embryos. The apical domain perimeter measures the cell outline apical to the junctions and represents a two-dimensional approximation of the apical surface area. (B) Normalized cell length as a function of time in the #3 to #6 neighboring cells in wild-type, α-catenin RNAi, and Rap1V12-overexpressing embryos. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Loss of Rap1 Function Causes Restricted Invagination Similar to Constitutive Activation of Rap1 Two-photon time-lapse images of the midsagittal section view of E-Cadherin-GFP (green) and membrane-mCherry (magenta) in a gastrulating RapN17 embryo that overexpresses Bazooka-GFP. AF, anterior fold; PF, posterior fold. Scale bar, 10 μm. See also Figure S3 and Movie S5. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 A Model for the Initiation and Invagination of Dorsal Fold Formation The anterior and posterior folds undergo a similar process of initiation during the phase I of dorsal fold formation during which polarity modification resulting from a decrease in the levels of Par-1 (light green) in the initiating cells causes a basal 0 shift of adherens junctions (blue arrows). In the phase II of dorsal fold formation, high levels of Rapgap1 expression in the neighboring cells of posterior fold likely drive rapid GTPase cycle of Rap1 to uncouple junctions from actin, allowing cell shortening to propagate across the tissue and the incorporation of these cells into a deep tissue fold. In contrast, low levels of Rapgap1 expression in the neighboring cells of anterior fold ensures constitutive activation of Rap1 that tightly couples junctions to actin to restrict neighboring cell shortening and invagination. Developmental Cell 2013 25, 299-309DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions