Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Rifampicin Inhibits α-Synuclein Fibrillation and Disaggregates Fibrils
Investigation of Domain Formation in Sphingomyelin/Cholesterol/POPC Mixtures by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Monte Carlo Simulations  Monica.
Volume 96, Issue 10, Pages (May 2009)
Kiersten M. Ruff, Siddique J. Khan, Rohit V. Pappu  Biophysical Journal 
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Martin Lignell, Lotta T. Tegler, Hans-Christian Becker 
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Surface Characterization of Insulin Protofilaments and Fibril Polymorphs Using Tip- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (TERS)  Dmitry Kurouski, Tanja Deckert-Gaudig,
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Phase Transitions in Biological Systems with Many Components
David C. Latshaw, Carol K. Hall  Biophysical Journal 
Modes of Diffusion of Cholera Toxin Bound to GM1 on Live Cell Membrane by Image Mean Square Displacement Analysis  Pierre D.J. Moens, Michelle A. Digman,
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
An Equilibrium Model for the Combined Effect of Macromolecular Crowding and Surface Adsorption on the Formation of Linear Protein Fibrils  Travis Hoppe,
Jia Xu, Yingying Lee, Lesa J. Beamer, Steven R. Van Doren 
Jérôme Lang, Amandine Maréchal, Manon Couture, Jérôme Santolini 
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Kiersten M. Ruff, Siddique J. Khan, Rohit V. Pappu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Heleen Meuzelaar, Jocelyne Vreede, Sander Woutersen 
Fiber-Dependent and -Independent Toxicity of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Haden L. Scott, Justin M. Westerfield, Francisco N. Barrera 
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Protein Fibrillation Lag Times During Kinetic Inhibition
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 109, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Channeling of cAMP in PDE-PKA Complexes Promotes Signal Adaptation
Hongyu Zhang, Sophie E. Jackson  Biophysical Journal 
Lipid Headgroups Modulate Membrane Insertion of pHLIP Peptide
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Cyclic N-Terminal Loop of Amylin Forms Non Amyloid Fibers
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Kinetics of Surface-Driven Self-Assembly and Fatigue-Induced Disassembly of a Virus- Based Nanocoating  Alejandro Valbuena, Mauricio G. Mateu  Biophysical.
Volume 96, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Two Latent and Two Hyperstable Polymeric Forms of Human Neuroserpin
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 93, Issue 10, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Volume 112, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Seongwon Kim, Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages 937-948 (February 2015) Structural Transitions and Interactions in the Early Stages of Human Glucagon Amyloid Fibrillation  Balakrishnan S. Moorthy, Hamed Tabatabaei Ghomi, Markus A. Lill, Elizabeth M. Topp  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages 937-948 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Kinetics of glucagon fibrillation by intrinsic fluorescence (solid circle), ThT fluorescence (solid square), and turbidity (solid diamond) measurements. Glucagon at 0.6 mg/mL was allowed to fibrillate and the change in signals were measured. Lines are fits to the Boltzmann equation (n = 3, mean ± SD). The regression parameters are given in Table 1. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural changes during glucagon fibrillation. CD measurements were carried out at regular intervals for the fibrillating glucagon. (A) Overlay of CD spectra from fibrillating glucagon (0–1440 min). (B) Percent α-helix (solid line) and β-sheet (dashed line) content determined using the K2D3 program. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 HDX kinetics for monomeric glucagon. HDX reactions were carried out for freshly prepared glucagon. Samples were withdrawn at various times (0.5–120 min) and analyzed using MS. Deuterium uptake was assessed for both intact glucagon and for proteolytic digests. (A) Deuterium uptake for intact glucagon as a function of time (0.5–120 min). Lines are fits to a monoexponential association function (Eq. 2) (n = 3). Standard deviations are less than the size of the symbols. The vertical dotted line indicates the half-life (t1/2 = 5.3 min). (B) Percent deuterium uptake for nine pepsin digest fragments from glucagon as a function of time (0.5–30 min) (n = 3). Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 HDX-MS of fibrillating glucagon at the intact level. A 5 min pulse labeling with deuterium was carried out for the fibrillating glucagon at regular intervals (0–480 min) and deuterium uptake measured by MS analysis. (A) Enhanced deuterated mass envelope of intact glucagon (m/z = 871.1729, z = +4) showing bimodal peak distribution (Peak I and II) during fibrillation. Gray and black broken lines represent the centroid of the mass envelope after 0 min and 1440 min of fibrillation, respectively. (B) Glucagon fibrillation as monitored by tryptophan (Trp-25) emission at 355 nm (solid circle), ThT florescence at 482 nm (solid square), turbidity at 405 nm (solid diamond), and deuterium uptake by amide HDX-MS (solid triangle) (n = 3, mean ± SD). See text for details of methods and calculations. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Interactions during glucagon fibrillation monitored by amide HDX-MS. A 5 min pulse labeling with deuterium was carried out for fibrillating glucagon at regular intervals (0–480 min). The deuterium uptake was measured by MS analysis following online pepsin digestion (A) Percent deuterium uptake for peptides 1–6, 1–9, 10–21, and 22–29 as a function of time of fibrillation. Lines represent fits to monoexponential decay; see text for details (n = 3, mean ± SD). (B) t50 values for the decrease in deuterium incorporation in the nine glucagon fragments (n = 3 ± SE). Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 HDX-MS of mature glucagon fibrils. Glucagon at 0.6 mg/mL was allowed to fibrillate and subjected to HDX. Deuterium uptake was measured by MS analysis following online pepsin digestion. Percent deuterium uptake for the three glucagon peptides in Peaks I′’ (black bars) and II′ (gray bars) following 48 h of HDX (n = 3, mean ± SD). Intensity of Peak II′ relative to Peak I′ (white bars) (i.e., [Peak II′ intensity/Peak I′ intensity] × 100) for the three peptic fragments following 48 h of HDX (n = 3, mean ± SD). Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Identification of critical contacts for the C-terminal interactions in glucagon fibrillation under acidic conditions. The 10 most frequent contacts observed in simulations of two molecules of glucagon fragment 22–29 are shown. Each line represents one of the 10 interactions, which are ordered from red to blue based on frequency. The amino acid residues are indicated by their single letter code with residue numbers on the left. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Proposed model for the aggregation of glucagon at acidic pH. In solution, glucagon exists as unstructured monomers. Early stage interactions in glucagon fibrillation are mediated through the C-terminal region, which results in the formation of α-helix-rich oligomers. Oligomers formed during the lag phase undergo structural rearrangements and elongation to form β-sheet-rich amyloid fibrils by mechanisms not defined by the results reported here. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 937-948DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.004) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions