Pluripotent stem cell models of cardiac disease and their implication for drug discovery and development  Richard P. Davis, Cathelijne W. van den Berg,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/24/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Translation of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells:
Advertisements

鞠俊.  Taking this into account, it makes sense that the induction of pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) from somatic cells also requires transformation.
Stem Cells: A Renaissance in Human Biology Research
SAFETY EFFICIENCY REPROGRAMMING Integrating viral vectors*
Biotechnology Objectives: At the end of this lecture we will be able to identify and describe the uses of biotechnology in society.
Translation: Screening for Novel Therapeutics With Disease-Relevant Cell Types Derived from Human Stem Cell Models  Stephen J. Haggarty, Roy H. Perlis 
FoxO: A New Addition to the ESC Cartel
Valeria V. Orlova, Christine L. Mummery  Cell Stem Cell 
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Now Open to Discovery
Lixia Yao, James A. Evans, Andrey Rzhetsky  Trends in Biotechnology 
Use of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Dermatological Research
F-Class Cells: New Routes and Destinations for Induced Pluripotency
Pluripotent Stem Cells from Cloned Human Embryos: Success at Long Last
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Pluripotent stem cell models of cardiac disease and their implication for drug discovery and development  Richard P. Davis, Cathelijne W. van den Berg,
Treating Immunodeficiency through HSC Gene Therapy
Robert Passier, Christine Mummery  Cell Stem Cell 
Advances in basic and clinical immunology in 2011
Robert Zweigerdt, Ina Gruh, Ulrich Martin  Cell Stem Cell 
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Now Open to Discovery
Stem Cells and Drug Discovery: The Beginning of a New Era?
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Tomasz J. Kolanowski, Christopher L. Antos, Kaomei Guan 
Jacob H. Hanna, Krishanu Saha, Rudolf Jaenisch  Cell 
Gary Gintant, Bernard Fermini, Norman Stockbridge, David Strauss 
Soledad Matus, Danilo B. Medinas, Claudio Hetz  Cell Stem Cell 
Krishanu Saha, Rudolf Jaenisch  Cell Stem Cell 
Introducing a New Dimension to Molecular Disease Classifications
Adrian Kee Keong Teo, Amy J. Wagers, Rohit N. Kulkarni  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Florian T. Merkle, Kevin Eggan  Cell Stem Cell 
The Nexus of Tet1 and the Pluripotency Network
Direct Lineage Reprogramming: Strategies, Mechanisms, and Applications
A rapidly evolving revolution in stem cell biology and medicine
Haploid Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Half the Genome, Double the Value
Rudolf Jaenisch, Richard Young  Cell 
Pluripotent Stem Cells and Disease Modeling
How Chemoproteomics Can Enable Drug Discovery and Development
Engineering Stem Cell Organoids
Lorenz Studer, Elsa Vera, Daniela Cornacchia  Cell Stem Cell 
Chemical Genetics and Orphan Genetic Diseases
Induction of Pluripotency: From Mouse to Human
Induced pluripotent stem cells: A new era for hepatology
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Steve S.W. Han, Luis A. Williams, Kevin C. Eggan  Neuron 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Modeling Rett Syndrome with Stem Cells
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Stem Cells: A Renaissance in Human Biology Research
Mitochondrial Regulation in Pluripotent Stem Cells
Moonjung Jung, Cynthia E Dunbar, Thomas Winkler  Molecular Therapy 
Molecular Therapeutics for Heritable Skin Diseases
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
“Transflammation”: When Innate Immunity Meets Induced Pluripotency
From Skin to Blood: A New Member Joins the iClub
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Daria Prilutsky, Nathan P
Franck Mauvais-Jarvis, Arthur P. Arnold, Karen Reue  Cell Metabolism 
Embryonic and adult stem cell therapy
Natalay Kouprina, Vladimir Larionov 
Kazim H Narsinh, Jordan Plews, Joseph C Wu  Molecular Therapy 
Historical Origins of Transdifferentiation and Reprogramming
Abby Sarkar, Konrad Hochedlinger  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Obstacles to Clinical Translation of iPSCs
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
CRISPR Craze to Transform Cardiac Biology
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Cellular Alchemy and the Golden Age of Reprogramming
Presentation transcript:

Pluripotent stem cell models of cardiac disease and their implication for drug discovery and development  Richard P. Davis, Cathelijne W. van den Berg, Simona Casini, Stefan R. Braam, Christine L. Mummery  Trends in Molecular Medicine  Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 475-484 (September 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.001 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Generation of hiPSCs. In humans, iPSC lines have been generated from a range of somatic cell types, such as fibroblasts, keratinocytes, adipocytes and terminally differentiated lymphocytes. These somatic cells can be reprogrammed to hiPSCs by the overexpression of the pluripotency-associated genes, OCT4, SOX2, C-MYC and KLF4. Some of these transcription factors can be replaced by other genes or, depending on the somatic cell type, excluded. The reprogramming genes can be delivered into the somatic cells by a variety of approaches including retroviruses, lentiviruses or adenoviruses, or by the use of transposons. The continued presence of the reprogramming factors in the iPSCs can have adverse effects on their cellular function, and therefore generating integration-free iPSCs efficiently is desirable. This can be done by using vectors that do not integrate into the host cell genome (adenoviruses) or by using integrating vectors that can be subsequently removed from the genome (excisable lentiviruses or transposons). Recently, integration-free hiPSCs have been produced by using modified RNA molecules to introduce the reprogramming factors into the somatic cells. Additionally, several small molecules, such as the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) or the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signaling inhibitor E-616452, can either increase the reprogramming efficiency or replace individual reprogramming factors. The resulting hiPSC lines can then be differentiated in vitro into cardiomyocytes (Box 3). Trends in Molecular Medicine 2011 17, 475-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.001) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Current and future cardiac drug discovery approaches (modified from [59]). Traditional approaches to drug target discovery involve performing basic research on disease mechanisms first, usually using standard genetic and biochemical techniques, and this information identifies new potential drug targets. These targets are validated in cultured cardiomyocytes (if available) and transgenic or knockout mice, a process often taking many years with several possible points of failure. Consequently, the most important step, small molecule screening for agonists or antagonists of the targets, can be delayed. An alternative approach could be ‘phenotype-based’ high-throughput screens using hiPSC-CMs in combination with (a) siRNA libraries or (b) chemical libraries to identify novel drug targets and small molecules, respectively. These unbiased approaches on bona fide human cardiomyocytes could identify drug targets or classes of compounds that elicit a desired effect without a deep understanding of the biological processes a priori. At later stages, optimized lead compounds could be tested in the same cell model to understand the underlying mechanisms, thereby accelerating translation of preclinical discoveries to clinical testing. siRNA, small interfering RNA; ADME, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2011 17, 475-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.001) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure I Electrophysiological differences between adult human and mouse CMs. Human and mouse hearts display unique ECG profiles, with the QT interval in humans approximately five times longer than in mice. This is also reflected in the different AP durations and shapes of the ventricular CMs from these two species and is due to their distinctive ionic currents. Although the inward Na+ and Ca2+ currents (INa and ICaL, respectively) are comparable between mouse and human CMs, major differences are observed in the various outward K+ currents (in blue), which play distinct roles in human and mouse AP repolarization. The IKs and IKr are the major repolarizing currents in human CMs, whereas in mice Ito is the predominant current. Additionally IK,slow1, IK,slow2 and Iss contribute to repolarization in mouse CMs, but are absent from human ventricular CMs. The APs and their underlying ionic currents are aligned with their approximate time of action during the QT interval shown in the ECG examples. ms, millisecond. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2011 17, 475-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.001) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure II In vitro properties that can be quantitatively measured and compared between cardiomyocytes derived from PSC disease models. ESC or iPSC lines containing a genetic mutation associated with cardiac disease, along with the appropriate control cells, can be differentiated into cardiac cell types. Assays based on electrophysiology, physiology, morphology, or gene or protein expression can be performed on these cells, enabling the underlying mechanism of the disease to be investigated, as well as any potential therapeutic interventions to be assessed. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2011 17, 475-484DOI: (10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.001) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions