Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M/A: Spindle assembly checkpoints Empirical observations: arrest of mitotic progress in presence of spindle poisons (e.g., colcemid) Delay of mitotic progress.
Advertisements

Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint  Alexei Mikhailov, Richard W Cole,
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Jakub K. Famulski, Gordon K. Chan  Current Biology 
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Control of Shugoshin Function during Fission-Yeast Meiosis
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
The Spindle Checkpoint Kinase Bub1 and Cyclin E/Cdk2 Both Contribute to the Establishment of Meiotic Metaphase Arrest by Cytostatic Factor  Brian J Tunquist,
Verena N. Lorenz, Michael P. Schön, Cornelia S. Seitz 
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages (November 2004)
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
S. pombe Aurora Kinase/Survivin Is Required for Chromosome Condensation and the Spindle Checkpoint Attachment Response  Janni Petersen, Iain M. Hagan 
Spindle Checkpoint Protein Dynamics at Kinetochores in Living Cells
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Positive or Negative Roles of Different Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Pho85-Cyclin Complexes Orchestrate Induction of Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 
Katharina Sewart, Silke Hauf  Current Biology 
Functional Comparison of H1 Histones in Xenopus Reveals Isoform-Specific Regulation by Cdk1 and RanGTP  Benjamin S. Freedman, Rebecca Heald  Current Biology 
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Gislene Pereira, Elmar Schiebel  Molecular Cell 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Benjamin A. Wolfe, W. Hayes McDonald, John R. Yates, Kathleen L. Gould 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Cdc28-Dependent Regulation of the Cdc5/Polo Kinase
CENP-E as an Essential Component of the Mitotic Checkpoint In Vitro
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Mad2 and Mad3 Cooperate to Arrest Budding Yeast in Mitosis
Hong-Guo Yu, Douglas Koshland  Cell 
Distinct Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Functions of the S
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Viktoriya Syrovatkina, Chuanhai Fu, Phong T. Tran  Current Biology 
Moving Right Along: How PP1 Helps Clear the Checkpoint
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Cell Division: Aurora B Illuminates a Checkpoint Pathway
Fission Yeast Apc15 Stabilizes MCC-Cdc20-APC/C Complexes, Ensuring Efficient Cdc20 Ubiquitination and Checkpoint Arrest  Karen M. May, Flora Paldi, Kevin.
Control of Lte1 Localization by Cell Polarity Determinants and Cdc14
Nitobe London, Steven Ceto, Jeffrey A. Ranish, Sue Biggins 
Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: The mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death  Beth A.A. Weaver, Don W. Cleveland 
Jean-François Maure, Etsushi Kitamura, Tomoyuki U. Tanaka 
Jeffrey K. Moore, Valentin Magidson, Alexey Khodjakov, John A. Cooper 
Benjamin A. Pinsky, Christian R. Nelson, Sue Biggins  Current Biology 
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
D.Michelle Brady, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Antony M. Carr, Mohammed Moudjou, Nicola J. Bentley, Iain M. Hagan 
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
KNL1/Spc105 Recruits PP1 to Silence the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Presentation transcript:

A Novel Protein Phosphatase 1-Dependent Spindle Checkpoint Silencing Mechanism  Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology  Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages 1176-1181 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ark1 Activity Is Required to Maintain the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex/Anaphase-Promoting Complex and Cell-Cycle Arrest (A) In the presence of the ATP analog 1NMPP1, Ark1 is the only kinase directly inhibited in ark1-as3 cells [13]. The spindle checkpoint was activated via the cold-sensitive tubulin mutant nda3-KM311. After 6 hr at the restrictive temperature, 80%–90% of cells were arrested with high levels of cyclin B on spindle pole bodies (SPBs), and all kinetochores were unattached. At this point, DMSO (control) or 1NMPP1 was added to the culture to inhibit Ark1, and the levels of cyclin B were monitored by live-cell imaging. In the presence of 1NMPP1, cyclin B levels dropped rapidly, demonstrating that Ark1 activity is required to maintain spindle checkpoint arrest in response to unattached kinetochores. The time after DMSO or 1NMPP1 addition is indicated in minutes. (B) Cells were fixed 40 min after addition of 1NMPP1. Most cells escaped arrest and underwent cytokinesis (arrows). (C) Top: after addition of 1NMPP1, a few cells remain arrested with high levels of cyclin B on SPBs (cell 1), whereas most escaped the arrest and precociously degraded cyclin B (cell 2). Bottom: the number of “escaped” cells was quantified in a 60 min time course. Data are derived from four independent experiments; error bars represent standard deviation. (D) 1NMPP1 addition and Ark1 inhibition have no effect on microtubule depolymerization in the nda3KM311 mutant. Anti-tubulin immunofluorescence confirms that at 18°C, all microtubules are depolymerized, whereas spindles are formed 15 min after release at 32°C. (E) Mitotic checkpoint complex/anaphase-promoting complex (MCC-APC) complexes are disassembled following Aurora inhibition with 1NMPP1. Lid1-TAP ark1-as3 Mad2-GFP Mad3-GFP nda3KM311 cells were arrested in mitosis (6 hr at 18°C), and the culture was divided before DMSO or 5 μM 1NMPP1 addition. Lid1p was immunoprecipitated from samples collected every 10 min and immunoblotted for associated Mad2-GFP and Mad3-GFP. (F) Model of MCC-APC binding. Current Biology 2009 19, 1176-1181DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PP1Dis2 Phosphatase Is Required for Checkpoint Silencing Following Ark1 Inhibition, and dis2 Mutants Have a Delay in Anaphase Onset upon Spindle Reassembly (A) When shifted to their restrictive temperature of 18°C, nda3-KM311 cells depolymerize microtubules and activate the spindle checkpoint with unattached kinetochores. Over time, nda3-KM311 and nda3KM311 dis2Δ cells accumulate in early mitosis with high levels of cyclin B (Cdc13-GFP) in the nucleus and on SPBs, showing that, unlike Mad2p, Dis2p is not required for checkpoint arrest. (B) The silencing assay was used to test whether phosphatases played a role in checkpoint silencing. Strikingly, when 1NMPP1 was added to the cultures, APC activation and cyclin B degradation were negligible in the absence of PP1Dis2 (dis2Δ), suggesting that PP1Dis2 is critical for checkpoint silencing upon Ark1 inhibition. This is a specific defect, because sds21Δ and clp1Δ mutants behaved like wild-type (as did PP2APar1 mutants; data not shown). For simplicity, the DMSO controls are not shown here. Data are derived from a minimum of three experiments; error bars represent standard deviation. (C and D) nda3KM311-arrested cells (6 hr at 18°C) were allowed to reform their spindle at the permissive temperature of 32°C (see Experimental Procedures). Progression through mitosis was then followed at regular intervals using spindle length as a marker, scoring the percentage of metaphase (C) and anaphase (D) cells. Upon recovery from nda3KM311 arrest, lack of Dis2p induced ∼20 min metaphase delay, whereas lack of Sds21p had no effect on the kinetics of anaphase onset. Current Biology 2009 19, 1176-1181DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Silencing Model Top: at unattached kinetochores, centromeric chromatin is not under tension, and centromere-localized Ark1 kinase (the green cloud of activity) is in close proximity to kinetochore-localized checkpoint components and can phosphorylate them efficiently, leading to effective APC inhibition. Bottom: stable attachments are formed after biorientation and lead to inter- and intrakinetochore stretching. This displaces Ark1 from kinetochore substrates and reduces its ability to phosphorylate checkpoint components, which can in turn be dephosphorylated by PP1Dis2 (orange clouds of activity), leading to checkpoint silencing. Current Biology 2009 19, 1176-1181DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.060) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions